Senate Closer to Indecency Bill

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. Senate Commerce Committee plans to finish work on a broadcast indecency bill on Tuesday and send it to the Senate floor, where it is expected to pass overwhelmingly.

The bill, authored by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kansas, is similar to one introduced in the House that increased the maximum fine for indecency to $275,000 from $27,500.

But the House on Wednesday substantially strengthened its bill by increasing the maximum fine to $500,000 and including a “three strikes” license revocation provision.

Senators are likely to toughen the Brownback bill but may strike a compromise between the original legislation and the new House bill, sponsored by Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich.

The full House will vote sometime later this week.

In related news, the FCC said it won’t reconsider a fine levied in December against a Michigan FM radio station owned by Infinity Broadcasting, a division of Viacom Inc.

Friday’s decision is small, but the ruling’s inference is big.

It indicates that the regulatory agency would consider each utterance in a broadcast as a violation of the FCC indecency guidelines.

The amount would increase dramatically if Upton’s bill is passed that would allow the FCC to impose a maximum fine of $500,000 per violation, with no overall maximum.

The FCC fines stations, not individuals, for violations of its standards. Under the guidelines, “indecent” material generally refers to broadcasts containing sexual or excretory references that are aired between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.

The FCC also said it would weigh whether to initiate license revocation hearings for similar violations.

Viacom in the appeal had questioned the move toward considering license revocation proceedings. It also questioned the FCC’s decision to impose the maximum fine on the matter.

The FCC fined WKRK-FM in Detroit for a half-hour “Deminski and Doyle” show. The 4:30 p.m. broadcast included nine callers who discussed their sexual activities in detail.

Infinity didn’t deny that the material met established definitions for indecency but raised First Amendment questions.

While the agency’s decision to uphold the $27,500 fine against WKRK was unanimous, FCC Commissioner Michael Copps said the fine is “insufficient and not even a slap on the wrist for airing what can only be described as a vulgar and disgusting broadcast.”

FCC Commissioner Kevin Martin said there were several that would have justified a total fine of $200,000.

FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein said he was “disappointed that the licensee in this case continues to challenge this sanction rather than accept responsibility for such an extreme violation of our rules.”

Rulings by the FCC can be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals.

The FCC’s decision comes a week Clear Channel Communications Inc agreed to pay a $775,000 fine for airing programs by a Florida disc jockey called “Bubba the Love Sponge.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Australian eSafety Commissioner Demands Stricter Child Protection Codes

Australia’s online safety regulator, eSafety, is once again reviewing a “final” draft of industry codes to protect children from pornography and other age-inappropriate content, after eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant rejected the previously announced “final” codes as insufficiently stringent.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Moves to Outlaw Internet Pornography

A parliamentary committee of the Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Tuesday approved a measure to outlaw online adult content in the country.

Sweden Bans Purchase of 'Remote' Sexual Services

The Riksdag, Sweden’s parliament, has approved a proposal to criminalize purchasing sexual services performed remotely by streamers and custom content creators.

AV Bulletin: Arizona's About-Face, What New Laws Mean for Adult

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the United States. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, the U.K. and the EU are moving ahead with their own AV mandates and strategies, and legal challenges continue to play out in U.S. courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

FSC Addresses UK Age Verification Guidelines

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published an article offering guidance on the U.K.'s Online Safety Act and the various guidelines put forward by the country's telecommunications regulator Ofcom.The article follows:

European Commission Posts AV Guidelines, Seeks Feedback

The European Commission has made public its draft guidelines on protecting minors online under the Digital Services Act, including age verification requirements covering adult sites and platforms.

Sex Workers' Group Fights Proposed Swedish Ban on 'Remote' Sexual Services

The European Sex Workers’ Rights Alliance (ESWA) has launched a campaign against a Swedish government proposal to expand current laws against purchasing sexual services to apply to acts performed remotely by streamers and custom content creators.

FSC: Arizona Governor Signs Controversial Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition has released a statement regarding Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs signing the state's age verification bill into law.

NCOSE Sues 4 Adult Websites Under Kansas Age Verification Law

The National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), a conservative anti-pornography organization, has sued four adult websites in Kansas under the state's age verification law.

2025 XBIZ Miami Show Schedule Announced

XBIZ is pleased to announce the release of the full show schedule for XBIZ Miami, the adult industry's biggest summer conference, set to take place May 19-22 at the Nautilus Sonesta Miami Beach hotel.

Show More