Senate Closer to Indecency Bill

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. Senate Commerce Committee plans to finish work on a broadcast indecency bill on Tuesday and send it to the Senate floor, where it is expected to pass overwhelmingly.

The bill, authored by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kansas, is similar to one introduced in the House that increased the maximum fine for indecency to $275,000 from $27,500.

But the House on Wednesday substantially strengthened its bill by increasing the maximum fine to $500,000 and including a “three strikes” license revocation provision.

Senators are likely to toughen the Brownback bill but may strike a compromise between the original legislation and the new House bill, sponsored by Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich.

The full House will vote sometime later this week.

In related news, the FCC said it won’t reconsider a fine levied in December against a Michigan FM radio station owned by Infinity Broadcasting, a division of Viacom Inc.

Friday’s decision is small, but the ruling’s inference is big.

It indicates that the regulatory agency would consider each utterance in a broadcast as a violation of the FCC indecency guidelines.

The amount would increase dramatically if Upton’s bill is passed that would allow the FCC to impose a maximum fine of $500,000 per violation, with no overall maximum.

The FCC fines stations, not individuals, for violations of its standards. Under the guidelines, “indecent” material generally refers to broadcasts containing sexual or excretory references that are aired between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.

The FCC also said it would weigh whether to initiate license revocation hearings for similar violations.

Viacom in the appeal had questioned the move toward considering license revocation proceedings. It also questioned the FCC’s decision to impose the maximum fine on the matter.

The FCC fined WKRK-FM in Detroit for a half-hour “Deminski and Doyle” show. The 4:30 p.m. broadcast included nine callers who discussed their sexual activities in detail.

Infinity didn’t deny that the material met established definitions for indecency but raised First Amendment questions.

While the agency’s decision to uphold the $27,500 fine against WKRK was unanimous, FCC Commissioner Michael Copps said the fine is “insufficient and not even a slap on the wrist for airing what can only be described as a vulgar and disgusting broadcast.”

FCC Commissioner Kevin Martin said there were several that would have justified a total fine of $200,000.

FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein said he was “disappointed that the licensee in this case continues to challenge this sanction rather than accept responsibility for such an extreme violation of our rules.”

Rulings by the FCC can be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals.

The FCC’s decision comes a week Clear Channel Communications Inc agreed to pay a $775,000 fine for airing programs by a Florida disc jockey called “Bubba the Love Sponge.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

AV Bulletin: Age Verification Hits the Mainstream, Ofcom Sets a Date

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

Arcom Reports Age Verification Enforcement Actions Against 5 Adult Sites

French media regulator Arcom released a statement Tuesday detailing recent actions to enforce age verification rules as set forth under France’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law.

Ron Jeremy's Accusers Reach Settlement With Rainbow Bar & Grill

The Rainbow Bar & Grill has reached confidential settlements with a group of women who filed a negligence lawsuit against the Sunset Strip restaurant over alleged sexual assaults committed by Ron Jeremy, according to Rolling Stone.

Sportsheets Joins FSC as Gold Member

Sportsheets has joined Free Speech Coalition (FSC) as a Gold-level member.

AV Bulletin: Two End Runs, Two Failed Bills

Industry stakeholders and free speech advocates have anxiously been awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, which could significantly impact state age verification laws around the country. In the meantime, state legislatures continue to weigh and pass AV bills, AV tech providers continue to tout their services, and legal challenges continue to play out in the courts — with some cases on hold pending the SCOTUS ruling in Paxton.

FSC Helps Defeat Colorado AV Bill

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced that, with its help, Colorado's recently introduced age verification bill has been defeated.

Missouri AG Bypasses Legislature, Declares Age Verification Rule

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey on Wednesday announced a new state regulation requiring adult sites to implement age verification of users, bypassing the legislative process in a strategy not seen before in state-level efforts to mandate age verification.

Attorney Corey D. Silverstein Launches 'Q&A Series' on Social Media

Adult industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein has launched a Q&A series on his social media platforms.

'Over the Top' North Carolina Bill Could Play Havoc With Adult Sites

A bill filed in the North Carolina state Assembly on Monday would impose new rules that industry observers warn could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Swedish Government Proposes Ban on Purchasing 'Remote' Sexual Services

The Swedish government has asked the country’s Parliament to amend Swedish law so that current laws against purchasing sexual services would also apply to acts performed remotely by cammers, streamers and custom content creators.

Show More