Playboy Files Another Suit Over Nude Kate Moss Pics

Playboy Files Another Suit Over Nude Kate Moss Pics

NEW YORK — Playboy Enterprises Inc. last month filed another copyright infringement suit over images of Kate Moss that were allegedly used without permission.

Playboy has filed separate lawsuits against about a half-dozen companies that allegedly poached nude pics of Moss in Playboy magazine's 60th anniversary issue.

This time around Playboy filed suit against the operator of HintMag.com, a global fashion website with breaking news, designer interviews, model profiles, beauty reports and show reviews. The suit names HintMag.com’s parent, Hint Fashion Magazine LLC, and its editor, Lee Carter, as defendants.

Playboy’s copyright infringement suit filed in Manhattan federal court seeks $150,000 for each photo used from the January/February 2014 issue.

In its brief, Playboy included the 12 photos that allegedly appeared on the site.

Playboy argued that the site used the photos for “commercial purposes” because it runs ads on the site.

Two years ago, Playboy sued Harper’s Bazaar and the fashion magazine’s publishing house Hearst Communications with a similar suit, claiming that Harper’s editors posted a photograph of Moss dressed in its trademark Playboy bunny ears outfit online, and also linked to website Entertainement.ie that posted nine copyrighted nude images of the star.

Playboy also hit LeBook.com with a lawsuit in December of 2013 over the Moss photos, claiming LeBook violated its copyrights in an "ongoing, wanton and willful" fashion only days, if not hours, after Playboy's release of its special 60th anniversary issue.

Playboy also has filed several other infringement suits against defendants that were said to have posted the Moss pics online.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

House Committee Amends, Advances Federal AV Bill

A U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee voted Thursday to amend the SCREEN Act, which would make site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content federal law, and to advance the bill for review by the full Committee on Energy and Commerce.

New AI Companion Platform 'SinfulXAI' Launches

SinfulXAI, a new AI companion platform, has officially launched.

FSC 2026/2027 Board Members Announced

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the results of its 2026/2027 Board of Directors election.

Report: AVS Group Beefs Up AV After $1.3 Million Fine

Adult content provider AVS Group has begun to institute robust age checks on some of its websites after U.K. media regulator Ofcom last week imposed a penalty of approximately $1.3 million for noncompliance with Online Safety Act regulations, the BBC is reporting.

FSC: Federal Report Confirms Unfair Banking Discrimination Against Adult Industry

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) today announced that a federal report on debanking has concluded that several U.S. banks engaged in discriminatory banking practices against members of the adult industry.

Pineapple Support Names Natalie Pereira Executive Assistant

Pineapple Support has appointed Natalie Pereira as its new executive assistant.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches by Country for October, November

AEBN has released the list of popular searches from its straight and gay theaters by country in October and November.

FSC Summit Event Schedule Announced

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has revealed its slate of networking events and symposiums for its annual summit, set for January 15 during XBIZ 2026.

Pornhub Releases 2025 'Year in Review' Report

Pornhub has released its “Year in Review Insights” report for 2025, the 12th edition of the site’s annual statistics, data analysis, and infographic initiative.

Washington AV Bill Jumps on 'Health Warning' Bandwagon

A new age verification bill in the Washington state legislature would require adult sites to post notices warning users of alleged health risks, despite a previous federal court ruling against such requirements.

Show More