Swiss Court: No Protection for 'Obscene' Trademarks

Swiss Court: No Protection for 'Obscene' Trademarks

BERN, Switzerland — A Swiss court has sided with the nation’s trademark office in a case involving an application for the brand “Mindfuck,” ruling there is no protection for “obscene” trademarks.

The Swiss Administrative Court acted on a trademark application by entrepreneur Dr. Petra Bock, who already has a mark for “Mindfuck” in Germany. Bock is the author of the “Mindfuck” line of books that discuss the phenomenon of people sabotaging themselves with destructive thoughts.

Bock’s counsel argued that it is no longer conceivable that “Mindfuck” is “intolerably” sexually offensive in modern times and asked for the court to grant Bock a trademark for the conjoined words for use in various branding opportunities, including retail goods.

But the Swiss Administrative Court, in its decision, said that “Mindfuck” stood for a “sexual offense against good morals” and left no intellectual property protection for Bock.

The court noted that each country examines the protection of a brand according to its own legislation, jurisprudence and roadmap, and that “it would not be compatible with the legal weightings of the legal system and business morality if a vulgar term for sexual intercourse were found in a public register and the commercial exploitation would be encouraged by the granting of an exclusion right.”

Industry attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group told XBIZ he was surprised that Switzerland has decided not to protect “obscene” trademarks for commercial application.

“Switzerland's definition of ‘obscene’ is slightly different from ours,” Randazza said.  “And Switzerland doesn't have the First Amendment.

“Nevertheless, I'm somewhat surprised given the freedom of expression protections are pretty robust in Switzerland and Switzerland doesn't have the same stick up the ass feminists and Christians fucking everything up on a daily basis like we do.”   

In the U.S., a similar trademark case is on track to be decided. The Supreme Court heard arguments in January over whether The Slants, an Asian American rock band from Portland, Ore., can trademark its name despite the federal government’s objection that it is an "offensive" term.

With a ruling due ahead, U.S. justices will decide whether disparaging terms can be registered as trademarks or whether refusing registration is a violation of First Amendment rights.

The Slants’ long-running case specifically invites a challenge to the "immoral and scandalous" clause for trademarks that most affects the adult entertainment industry.

Randazza several years ago authored an amicus brief on behalf of the First Amendment Lawyers Association in The Slants case. The brief argued that subjective and arbitrary decisions about morality shouldn’t be used in determining whether a trademark should be issued.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Eye of Love Debuts 'Pheromone Roll-On Duo' From Bloom Line

Eye of Love has introduced the Pheromone Roll-On Duo fragrance set from its Bloom collection.

Full Circle Releases 'Grinders' Collection

Pleasure brand Full Circle has debuted its new Grinders collection of discreet vibrators.

Doc Johnson, Polynesian Pleasures Ink Distro Deal

Pleasure brand Polynesian Pleasures has signed a deal with Doc Johnson for global distribution.

Isa Bella, Selena Ivy Topline 'Lesbian Sex 28'

Isa Bella and Selena Ivy headline the latest release from Girlfriends Films, titled “Lesbian Sex 28.”

Catherine Knight Stars in Latest From Brazzers

Catherine Knight stars in the latest release from Brazzers, titled "GRWM (To Fuck)."

Sydney Screams, Creature Feature Toys & Tailends Studios Launch Limited Partnership

Sydney Screams, Creature Feature Toys, and Tailends Studios have launched a one-month campaign to produce customizable dildos, with some proceeds benefiting SWAID Collective.

Federal Appeals Court Vacates FTC 'Click to Cancel' Rule Pending Review

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit on Tuesday vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions, pending further review.

Elegant Angel Premieres Nicole Kitt Showcase 'Cats Eye'

Nicole Kitt gets the spotlight in a new four-part showcase release from Elegant Angel.

Sexpo Australia Founder Launches SexEx

Sexpo Australia founder David Ross has launched his new adult lifestyle expo, SexEx.

Private Releases 'The Love Hotel 2'

Private has released “The Love Hotel 2,” directed by Dave Menich.

Show More