U.S. Supreme Court to Review Child Porn Law

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review an 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision striking down a federal law that made sending computer messages offering child pornography a criminal offense even when no child pornography exists in the messages.

Last April, the Atlanta-based Circuit Court ruled that the pandering provision of the Protect Act, which made it a crime to distribute material purported to contain obscene depictions of minors engaging in sexual activity, was overbroad.

Congress passed the Protect Act in 2003 in an effort to resurrect the Child Porn Protection Act. The CPPA also made pandering child pornography a crime, but cast a wider net. The Protect Act refined the CPPA by criminalizing only the panderer.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals followed the logic in a similar case, Ashcroft vs. Free Speech Coalition, in finding the pandering provision to be overbroad, ruling it unconstitutional, adult entertainment industry attorney H. Louis Sirkin told XBIZ.

“In that sense, the court was right on the money,” Sirkin said.

U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, who filed the appeal on behalf of the government, said, “those who traffic in what purports to be child pornography deserve no sanctuary.”

While Sirkin said it is nearly impossible to predict what the Supreme Court might do with the case, he believes the focus of the action will be with respect to clarifying the meaning of pandering.

“If the Court were looking for a case to use to overturn the FSC decision, this certainly wouldn’t be a good choice,” Sirkin said. “But you never know. My hope is that it won’t alter the FSC decision because that case had to do with virtual child pornography and that isn’t at issue here.”

In the case at bar, Michael Williams was convicted under the Protect Act of entering a chatroom where he claimed to be in possession of pictures depicting a toddler that were sexual in nature. When authorities arrested Williams, no pictures of that nature were found. However, Williams was in possession of other child pornography, a crime for which he was convicted.

The 11th Circuit upheld the conviction on the possession charge, while overturning the conviction on the pandering charge. At the time, attorney Jeffrey Douglas told XBIZ that the decision made no difference as to Williams’ sentence.

“The [pandering] law is entirely unnecessary,” Douglas said. “Williams was set to serve 60 months in prison and he’ll still serve the same time for possession. The pandering law doesn’t change the outcome of the vast majority of criminal cases where the defendant is accused of possessing child porn.”

Rick Louis of the ASACP told XBIZ that the law is similar to ASACP’s Code of Ethics and Best Practices, but stressed the voluntary nature of ASACP’s efforts.

“Many pedophiles trade pictures online peer-to-peer, and the language being questioned in the Protect Act criminalizes offering someone child porn — even if you actually do not possess any,” Louis said. “On a certain level, ASACP’s Code of Ethics and Best Practices for adult sites reflect a similar zero tolerance policy, since they prohibit even marketing or advertising adult material by suggesting it features minors. The adult industry needs to demonstrate its absolute rejection of child pornography, and therefore sites that appear to cater to pedophiles, even if all material on those sites is legal, cannot join ASACP.”

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case this fall.

The case is U.S. vs. Williams, 06-694.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Strike 3 Holdings Sues Meta for Pirating Vixen Media Group Content to Train AI

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings filed suit in federal court this week, accusing Facebook parent company Meta of copyright infringement and alleging that Meta has extensively pirated VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Friday is Final AV Compliance Deadline in UK

Friday, July 25 marks U.K. media regulator Ofcom’s deadline for user-to-user services such as tube, cam and fan sites to implement its requisite “highly effective age assurance” measures for preventing minors from viewing adult content.

Two Texas Bills Restricting Sex Toy Sales Fail to Pass

Two bills aimed at restricting sales of sex toys have failed to pass the Texas state legislature during its 2025 session.

NYC Adult Stores Petition for Rehearing in Zoning Law Case

A group of adult businesses on Tuesday petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit to rehear a case involving a zoning law that could severely limit adult stores’ operations in New York City.

Ofcom Releases Transparency Reporting Guidelines

Ofcom, the U.K. media regulator, has made public its official guidance detailing how online service providers — including adult sites — will be required to publish annual transparency reports on their efforts to protect children from online harms.

New AV Rules Take Effect for Ireland-Based Sites

Ireland’s Online Safety Code came into force Monday, including a provision requiring adult sites headquartered in Ireland to implement age assurance measures beyond self-declaration.

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

JuicyAds Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

JuicyAds has won its World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the company's site and defraud customers.

France Reinstates Age Verification Rule for EU Sites

France’s highest court, the Council of State, on Tuesday reinstated age verification rules for EU-based sites under the country’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, ruling in favor of the French government and against Hammy Media.

Show More