EFF Asks Judge to Protect Free Speech in ‘Sponsored Links’ Suit

NEW YORK — In a case that pits trademark holders against search engine giant Google, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has sided with the Mountain View, Calif.-based technology behemoth, telling the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that restricting the purchase of sponsored links on trademark grounds has a chilling effect on free speech online.

In the case at bar, computer repair firm Rescuecom sued Google in 2004, asking the trial court to bar the search engine from selling sponsored links that contain the company’s trademark. Google won its motion to dismiss in that case, when U.S. District Judge Norman Mordue wrote, “[the] defendant's internal use of plaintiff's trademark trigger sponsored links is not a use of a trademark because there is no allegation that defendant places plaintiff's trademarks on any goods, containers, displays or advertisements, or that its internal use is visible to the public.”

Rescuecom appealed that decision, which prompted the EFF to file its amicus brief raising a free speech argument.

“The Internet has brought together speakers of many kinds — some competing with trademark owners, others criticizing them, still others simply referring to them while discussing other subjects or products,” EFF staff attorney Corynne McSherry said. “Services like Google's 'sponsored links' help people with something to say reach those who might be interested in hearing it.”

Google’s “sponsored links” feature allows anyone to buy advertisements attached to certain search terms. When users run a particular query, the appropriate sponsored links appear next to the search results.

But Rescuecom attorney Edmund Gegan said the practice infringes on the rights of trademark holders because it creates unnecessary confusion on the part of consumers.

“A consumer browsing through a magazine or a market's shelves expects products or advertisements near each other to potentially be competitive,” Gegan said. “However, when an Internet user submits a search query, such as 'Rescuecom,' to an Internet search engine, the user expects the search results to be relevant to the query, and to be placed in order of relevance, with the results at the very top being the most relevant.”

But EFF staff attorney Jason Schultz disagreed, saying that trademarks online are more than simply identifiers for the search engine index.

“They are essential navigation tools and vehicles of expression,” Schultz said. “Quashing this speech goes against both the law and the public interest.”

As a concrete example in support of its argument, the EFF began its brief with a discussion of a recent campaign by farm workers to pressure McDonalds to raise its wages. The EFF cited a New York Times article on the effort that concluded one of the ways the group raised its profile was by purchasing “sponsored links” for the search term “McDonalds.”

“This is an example of the important free speech activity that search engines help facilitate,” the EFF brief said. “Fortunately Google will also display additional information a user might not initially seek but sill find valuable via its ‘sponsored links’ [service].”

The brief can be read here.

The case is Rescuecom vs. Google, 06-4881-CV.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Trial Set for Lawsuit by U Wisconsin Professor Fired Over Adult Content

A trial date of June 22, 2026, has been set for the civil lawsuit filed by veteran communications professor Joe Gow against the University of Wisconsin board of regents, which fired him for creating and appearing in adult content.

New UK Task Force Meets to Target Adult Content

The architect of an influential report that recommended banning adult content deemed “degrading, violent and misogynistic” has convened an “Independent Pornography Review task force” aimed at translating that report’s findings into action in the U.K.

11:11 Creations Launches Affiliate Program

11:11 Creations principal Alicia Silver has launched 11:11 Cash for creators and affiliates.

Pineapple Support, Pornhub to Host 'Self Love' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Pornhub are hosting a free online support group for performers to develop self-love.

Show More