Judge Won't Dismiss Privacy Suit Against Facebook

OAKLAND, Calif. — A federal judge yesterday refused to dismiss a class-action lawsuit that claims Facebook illegally scans privates messages for targeted advertising purposes.

The suit involving Facebook, described as the “world’s largest social networking platform” with approximately 1.2 billion users worldwide, is of particular importance to website operators worldwide as more online privacy law cases get filed in courts.

The class suit, brought on by lead plaintiff Matthew Campbell last year, contends that Facebook private messages are supposed to relay private communications, and that Facebook's violates the federal Wiretap Act and California's Invasion of Privacy Act and its Business and Professions Code by scanning them.

In the suit, Campbell claims that Facebook treats web links in private messages as "likes," and that if there's a link in a message the linked site received an additional "like" on its counter.

Facebook uses this data regarding “likes” to compile user profiles, which it then uses to deliver targeted advertising to its users, the suit said.

Facebook countered it stopped updating the link counter using messages to deliver targeted advertising to users two years ago and further argued that users consented to messages’ “interception” for purposes of facilitating delivery, thus Facebook has blanket immunity for any use of that information other than for the purpose of committing a criminal or tortious act."

But in a hearing in October Facebook counsel said that it still conducts some analysis of users' messages to protect against viruses and filter out spam.

U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton on Tuesday, in  her order granting in part and denying in part Facebook's motion to dismiss, said that she rejected Facebook’s argument that plaintiffs expressly consented to the interceptions.

"[T]he use of that web crawler may constitute a separate 'interception' under the Wiretap Act," she wrote in denying Facebook's claims it violated the federal Wiretap Act.

"When asked, at the hearing, which portion of this policy provided notice of Facebook’s practice of scanning users’ messages, Facebook’s counsel pointed to the disclosure that Facebook 'may use the information we received about you' for “data analysis,” Hamilton wrote.

"However, this disclosure is not specific enough to establish that users expressly consented to the scanning of the content of their messages — which are described as 'private messages' — for alleged use in targeted advertising."

Hamilton also denied part of Facebook's motion to dismiss claims under the state Privacy Act, as well as its request to pare injunctive relief.

"Facebook moves to strike plaintiffs' request for injunctive relief, arguing that it ceased the challenged practice 'nearly two years ago,'" Hamilton wrote. "However, plaintiffs have adequately alleged that there is a 'sufficient likelihood' that Facebook could resume the practice, so the court denies Facebook's request to strike the prayer for injunctive relief at this time."

The class-action plaintiffs are seeking an injunction against Facebook to stop the practice of scanning URLs in private messages, as well as statutory damages, which includes $100 for each day that Facebook violated the state Privacy Act, per each member of the class.

View yesterday's order

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Pineapple Support Taps Char Borley as Brand Ambassador

Pineapple Support has named Char Borley as its newest brand ambassador.

Michigan Legislators Propose Online Porn Ban

Michigan lawmakers have introduced a bill that would make it illegal to distribute pornography via the internet in the state.

Florida AG Sues Aylo, Segpay Over State AV Law

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed lawsuits against Aylo and Segpay on Monday with the 12th Judicial Circuit Court of Florida for noncompliance with HB3, the state's age verification law.

Colombian Court Sides with Performer Esperanza Goméz Over IG Suspensions

Colombia’s Constitutional Court last week ruled in favor of adult performer Esperanza Gómez in her legal battle against Meta over repeated suspensions of her Instagram account.

Missouri AG Announces Age Verification Rule to Take Effect Nov. 30

Newly appointed Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway announced Friday that the state's recently approved age verification regulation for adult websites will go into effect on Nov. 30.

Aylo, Woodhull Freedom Foundation to Tackle Online Censorship in Virtual Seminar

Aylo and Woodhull Freedom Foundation will co-host a virtual panel addressing online censorship on Sept. 30.

Severe Sex Films Relaunches Site Through YourPaysitePartner

Severe Sex Films has relaunched its official website through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Judge Awards Plaintiffs Over $400K in Attorneys Fees in Derek Hay Civil Case

California Superior Court Judge Gail Killefer has awarded former clients of LA Direct Models over $400,000 in attorneys fees and court costs, to be paid by agency founder Derek Hay.

ChickPass Rebrands as 'ChickPass Cinematic Universe'

ChickPass has announced that it has rebranded its network of sites as ChickPass Cinematic Universe.

New Adult Social Media Platform 'Havven' Opens Beta Phase

Havven, a new adult social media platform, has opened its beta phase and will officially launch Oct. 5.

Show More