Judge Apologizes, Reprimanded for Viewing Porn on the Job

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — The Florida Supreme Court has issued a public reprimand to a state judge for violating judicial ethics rules by repeatedly viewing pornography on his computer while in chambers.

Responding to Chief Justice R. Fred Lewis who called Judge Brandt Downey III’s behavior “truly shocking,” the Clearwater, Fla. circuit court judge said he was sorry.

Lewis spoke for the seven-judge appellate court, which oversees judicial ethics in the state.

"I am embarrassed to sit in the middle chair this morning," Lewis said. "To have a judge compelled to come before this court because of the type of behavior just stipulated constitutes true tarnish."

According to the stipulation accepted by the Supreme Court, Downey admitted to viewing pornographic websites from his computer in chambers from 2003 through 2005.

"I acknowledge that my actions were inappropriate," Downey said. "I beg everyone's forgiveness."

Downey, a 21-year veteran of the bench, will be forced to retire when his term expires Jan. 1. Further terms of his sanction include counseling. Downey also agreed that he would never seek re-election or reappointment and refrain from doing any post-retirement work as a senior judge.

During his remaining time on the bench, Downey’s computer access will be restricted, according to Lewis, who called the settlement a “deal with the devil.”

Downey said he has sought and received forgives from his friends and family. He also said he believes God has forgiven him.

Downey’s work-time viewing habits came to light after court employees complained that they had been exposed to pornography. Technicians working in the courthouse had told Downey on several occasions that he needed to stop accessing pornographic websites because they presented a security risk to the court’s computer system.

"The unacceptable behavior in which you engaged presents a picture of someone who simply does not understand the rudimentary bounds of judicial decorum or just doesn't care," Lewis told Downey.

In the ethical proceeding, Lewis also criticized Downey’s allegedly inappropriate behavior directed toward two female attorneys who had argued before him.

Downey denied the allegations, which Lewis described as showing inordinate interest in the female attorneys and commenting inappropriately on their appearance, including sending one of the woman a flirtatious email.

Lewis summed up his scolding of Downey asking the disgraced judge, “what were you thinking?”

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Ukrainian Legislators Revive Porn Decriminalization Push

The Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine’s parliament, is once again considering a bill that would decriminalize the creation and distribution of pornography in that country — an activity that currently carries a prison sentence of three to five years.

Ofcom Fines XGroovy $986,000 for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday imposed a fine of 700,000 pounds (about $986,000) against adult website XGroovy for failing to comply with provisions of the Online Safety Act.

Utah VPN Enforcement Pause Extended in Aylo Lawsuit

Provisions of a Utah law making adult websites liable if minors in the state circumvent geolocation efforts to bypass age verification, which were set to come into force in May, have again been put on hold temporarily.

Anti-Censorship Bill Could Shield US Sites From Foreign AV Laws

A Republican congressman has introduced legislation to bar U.S. courts from helping to enforce any foreign law restricting speech that would domestically be protected under the First Amendment, potentially including foreign age verification laws.

Romantix-Fargo Zoning Dispute Heads Back to District Court

A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that zoning officials in Fargo, North Dakota, acted in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner when they prevented sex toy retailer Romantix from opening a planned retail store in that city.

Appeals Court Upholds Section 230 Immunity in XVideos Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has upheld a lower court’s ruling that Section 230 protects WebGroup Czech Republic from liability in a case involving user-uploaded CSAM on its tube sites.

JustFor.fans Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has ruled in favor of JustFor.fans in a case against a website using an infringing domain.

Aylo Moves to Settle Two 'Children of Pornhub' Class-Action Lawsuits

Aylo has agreed to terms for a settlement with the plaintiffs in two long-running class actions over allegations that former Pornhub parent company MindGeek knowingly allowed and profited from CSAM on its sites.

FSC Hails Members, Allies in SCREEN Act Victory

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) released a statement today praising its members and allies after a successful lobbying effort to prevent the SCREEN Act, a nationwide age verification bill, from advancing out of the Commerce Committee for a full vote on the Senate floor.

SCREEN Act Stalls in Senate Committee Over Technicality

The Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday voted to approve the SCREEN Act, which would mandate nationwide site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content online, but a procedural issue blocked the bill from advancing to the full Senate.

Show More