Isaacs Shouldn't Remain Free Pending Appeal, U.S. Prosecutors Say

SAN FRANCISCO — U.S. prosecutors filed court papers today with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to oppose Ira Isaacs' motion allowing him to remain free on bail pending his appeal.

Justice Department attorneys claim in their opposition that Isaacs hasn't raised a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in reversal, a new trial or a sentence of no confinement.

Isaacs, who was stayed a surrender date in February after his conviction on obscenity charges, was given another sentencing date late last month, but his counsel, Roger Jon Diamond, re-filed a motion on Friday with the 9th Circuit to allow the fetish filmmaker to remain free pending his appeal.   

Isaacs was found guilty in April 2012 on five counts of violating federal obscenity laws over the mail distribution of  "Mako’s First Time Scat, " "Hollywood Scat Amateurs #7," "Hollywood Scat Amateurs #10" and "Japanese Doggie 3 Way."

In today's opposition, federal prosecutors address Isaacs' exclusion as an expert witness on his own behalf in the third trial (two others ended in mistrials), as well as limitations put forth on Diamond in his closing argument and the clarification of the meaning of "prurient interest" upon questions from the jury.

All of those issues were addressed in a re-filing of the appeal made by Diamond last week.

Federal prosecutors, in its opposition, claim that Isaacs was unable to meet the terms of the court as an expert witness, which determined that he wasn't qualified to testify as an expert. At trial, however, Isaacs was allowed to testify about his goals, inspirations, and intended meaning for the videos that he created.

Prosecutors also defended claims that the district court placed undue limitations on Diamond's closing argument. U.S. District Judge George King sustained the government's objections when Diamond discussed whether most other countries have the equivalent of the First Amendment and when he stated that in some countries one can get executed for exercising freedom of speech.

They also addressed Diamond's argument that the judge's clarification of the meaning of “prurient interest” upon a jury question during deliberations presented a “substantial question.”

The question by the jury was asked as part of the Miller test, a three-prong that sets the criteria over obscene works.

(The Miller test asks whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards would find that a work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functionsspecifically defined by state law; whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientifical value.)

"The district court — in response to the jury question: 'Under "prurient" interest, must all three criteria be met? ‘Morbid, degrading and unhealthy interest in sex’?” — conducted further research on the issue and found that [the 9th Circuit] had approved an instruction of 'prurient interest' that construed the descriptive terms in the disjunctive," federal prosecutors said.

"The district court clarified for the jury that the phrase 'morbid, degrading, and unhealthy' did not list separate criteria; instead, they are descriptive terms that describe what is a prurient interest as opposed to a mere candid interest in sex, and therefore, the jury need not find that the movies satisfy all three descriptive terms to be 'prurient,'" federal prosecutors said.

"There can be no dispute that the court’s instruction here was a correct statement of law."

View today's filing by federal prosecutors

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Missouri AG Announces Age Verification Rule to Take Effect Nov. 30

Newly appointed Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway announced Friday that the state's recently approved age verification regulation for adult websites will go into effect on Nov. 30.

Mag Numb Leads Latest From PlantsVsCunts

Mag Numb stars in the latest scene from Hentaied studio brand Plants Vs. Cunts, titled “The Book of Curses.”

Aylo, Woodhull Freedom Foundation to Host 'Online Censorship' Event

Aylo and Woodhull Freedom Foundation will co-host a virtual panel addressing online censorship on Sept. 30.

Connie Perignon Makes Her Debut for Parasited

Connie Perignon has made her Parasited debut in “A Lesson She Will Payback,” directed by El Pacho.

Aubrey Kate Featured in Latest From Kink.com

Aubrey Kate stars with Sage Roux in the new scene from Kink.com, titled “A Hole for the Prison Guard.”

Severe Sex Films Relaunches Site Through YourPaysitePartner

Severe Sex Films has relaunched its official website through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Judge Awards Plaintiffs Over $400K in Attorneys Fees in Derek Hay Civil Case

California Superior Court Judge Gail Killefer has awarded former clients of LA Direct Models over $400,000 in attorneys fees and court costs, to be paid by agency founder Derek Hay.

Stephanie Love, Elise London Topline 'Anal & MILFY' From LeWood

Stephanie Love and Elise London headline "Anal & MILFY," the latest release from directing duo LeWood (Francesca Le and Mark Wood) for Evil Angel.

ChickPass Rebrands as 'ChickPass Cinematic Universe'

ChickPass has announced that it has rebranded its network of sites as ChickPass Cinematic Universe.

Girthmasterr Makes His Brazzers Debut

Girthmasterr has made his Brazzers debut alongside Luna Star and multi-XMAs winner Angela White in the studio's latest release, titled "Welcumming Committee."

Show More