MyVidster Links Don't Infringe Flava Works Copyrights, Appeals Court Rules

CHICAGO — A three-judge appellate panel has overturned Flava Works preliminary injunction against MyVidster.com, ruling that the social video bookmarking site did not infringe on copyrights when it embedded copyright-infringing versions of Flava Works content from third-party websites.

The ruling overturns a 2011 preliminary injunction, which blocked MyVidster from linking to Flava Works videos, which primarily focus on gay black and Latino talent

MyVidster allows visitors to bookmark videos of their choice. Users can watch their embedded videos on MyVidster's page through a frame of advertisements on the site.

A federal judge earlier found that MyVidster contributed to infringing activity by encouraging users to share illegal video downloads, but the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday disagreed.

" MyVidster is not an infringer, at least in the form of copying or distributing copies of a copyrighted work. The infringers are the uploaders of the copyrighted work," 7th Circuit Judge Richard Posner wrote for the panel, which ruled 3-0 in favor of MyVidster.

"MyVidster is not just adding a frame around the video screen that the visitor is watching. Like a telephone exchange connecting two telephones, it is providing a connection between the server that hosts the video and the computer of MyVidster’s visitor.

"But as long as the visitor makes no copy of the copyrighted video that he is watching, he is not violating the copyright owner’s exclusive right, conferred by the Copyright Act, 'to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies' and 'distribute copies ...  of the copyrighted work to the public.'”

Flava Works may be able to obtain another injunction if it can show that MyVidster's service really does significantly contribute to the infringement of Flava's copyrights, Posner wrote, but so far it failed to meet that burden.

View ruling

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

NYC Adult Businesses Seek SCOTUS Appeal in Zoning Case

Attorneys representing a group of New York City adult businesses are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal of a lower court’s decision allowing enforcement of a 2001 zoning law aimed at forcing adult retail stores out of most parts of New York City.

Teasy Agency Launches Marketing Firm

Teasy Agency has officially launched Teasy Marketing firm.

Ofcom Investigates More Sites in Wake of AV Traffic Shifts

U.K. media regulator Ofcom has launched investigations into 20 more adult sites as part of its age assurance enforcement program under the Online Safety Act.

MintStars Launches Debit Card for Creators

MintStars has launched its MintStars Creator Card, powered by Payy.

xHamster Settles Texas AV Lawsuit, Pays $120,000

Hammy Media, parent company of xHamster, has settled a lawsuit brought by the state of Texas over alleged noncompliance with the state’s age verification law, agreeing to pay a $120,000 penalty.

RevealMe Joins Pineapple Support as Partner-Level Sponsor

RevealMe has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

OnlyFans Institutes Criminal Background Checks for US Creators

OnlyFans will screen creators in the United States for criminal convictions, CEO Keily Blair has announced in a post on LinkedIn.

Pineapple Support to Host 'Healthier Relationships' Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group on enhancing connection and personal growth.

Strike 3 Rejects Meta 'Personal Use' Defense in AI Suit

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings this week responded to Facebook parent company Meta’s motion to dismiss Strike 3’s suit accusing Meta of pirating VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pornhub, Stripchat: VLOP Designation Based on Flawed Data

In separate cases, attorneys for Pornhub and Stripchat this week told the EU’s General Court that the European Commission relied on unreliable data when it classified the sites as “very large online platforms” (VLOPs) under the EU’s Digital Services Act, news organization MLex reports.

Show More