AOL Settles With Playboy

DULLES, Virginia -- Barely a week after Playboy Enterprises was given the greenlight by an appeals court to proceed in a trademark infringement suit against Netscape Communications Inc., a unit of multimedia giant AOL/Time Warner, the two companies have settled, an AOL spokesperson announced.

Prior to today's announcement, there was industry-wide speculation that Playboy could potentially take AOL to the cleaners for damages that date back as far as five years. However, the two companies have decided to settle quietly outside of court.

"A settlement has been reached on this pending litigation," said Nicholas Graham, a spokesman for AOL. "The terms of the settlement are not disclosable."

The U.S. Appeals Court determined on Jan. 15 that a lower court had wrongly ruled in the case against Playboy. Charges stemmed from a 1999 case against now-defunct Excite.com and Netscape for infringing on the "Playboy" and "Playmate" trademarks using misleading search engine banner ads that had nothing to do with Playboy content.

The appeals court gave Playboy the right to sue Netscape for liability.

At the time the infringement occurred, Netscape was using Excite's search engine technology on its site.

In its original lawsuit, Playboy named around 400 words the two companies had used that insinuated a relationship with Playboy Enterprises and deliberately confused consumers. Playboy contended that the misleading banner "tarnished and diluted" its brand name.

The case was originally lost in 2001, but the appeals court last week decided that the Playboy trademark was equally protected in the virtual world as it was in more traditional mediums.

The appeals court decision to overturn an earlier ruling was one of the first times an appellate court has weighed in on the issue of search engine advertising as it relates to trademark infringement.

"The decision makes clear that the rules apply in the actual world with equal force to the virtual world," Playboy's attorney was quoted as saying at last week's ruling. "In the Internet as in the actual world, trademarks are not to be used in a way that is confusing or that dilutes the value of the mark."

In a similar vein, Google filed a complaint in a San Jose court in November 2003 in an effort to make sure that its method for keyword search advertising is within the boundaries of the law, in particular, trademark law.

Google has been in battle with a company called American Blind & Wallpaper Factory that has threatened to sue Google if it doesn't stop selling keyword phrases that the company claims violate its trademarks, CNET reports.

Google reportedly agreed to block keywords that directly infringe on American Blind & Wallpaper trademarks, but the search engine has refused to block all other similar phrases that American Blind feels infringe on its trademark.

Google is no stranger to similar trademark infringement threats. The search engine has also had rifts with eBay over trademark disputes, and luggage maker Louis Vuitton fined Google last year for trademark infringement in a French court.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Taylor Nicole Launches New Site Through YourPaysitePartner

Creator Taylor Nicole has launched her new official website through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Adult Networking Platform SpicyGigs.com Launches

SpicyGigs, a new adult industry networking platform, has officially launched.

Pineapple Support to Host 'Cream Pie Challenge' Fundraiser

Pineapple Support is hosting its Cream Pie Challenge through August to raise funds for mental health services for industry performers.

Kyrgyzstan President Signs Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

President Sadyr Japarov of Kyrgyzstan on Tuesday signed into law legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

NC Legislature Overrides Veto of Extreme Anti-Adult Industry Bill

The North Carolina state legislature on Tuesday voted to override Gov. Josh Stein’s veto of a bill imposing regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most creators and content.

Report: VPN Downloads Soar in UK Following Age Verification Deadline

Virtual private network apps, which can be used to circumvent geo-specific age verification requirements, are topping Apple App Store downloads in the U.K. in the wake of new Online Safety Act rules, the BBC is reporting.

Strike 3 Holdings Sues Meta for Pirating Vixen Media Group Content to Train AI

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings filed suit in federal court this week, accusing Facebook parent company Meta of copyright infringement and alleging that Meta has extensively pirated VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pineapple Support, Streamate to Host 'Navigating Grief and Loss' Support Group

Pineapple Support and Streamate are hosting a free online support group to help performers cope with grief and loss.

Friday is Final AV Compliance Deadline in UK

Friday, July 25 marks U.K. media regulator Ofcom’s deadline for user-to-user services such as tube, cam and fan sites to implement its requisite “highly effective age assurance” measures for preventing minors from viewing adult content.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for May, June

AEBN has released the top search terms for the months of May and June from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Show More