Top Attorneys Focus on Legal Landscape at XBIZ LA

LOS ANGELES — A renowned panel of adult industry attorneys covered a wide variety of legal topics impacting today's adult entertainment industry from file-sharing suits, 2257, obscenity prosecutions, .XXX and a new law that affects webmasters who engage in cross sales.

Nearly a hundred attendees filled the seats at the Adult Law: Today's Legal Landscape seminar at XBIZ LA to learn how to leverage the current laws to better protect themselves in the ever-changing legal landscape.

Moderated by XBIZ's executive director of publishing, Don Parret, the panel included attorneys Al Gelbard, Evan Stone, J.D. Obenberger, Greg Piccionelli and Marc Randazza.

One topic that was briefly touched on was the new law that prohibits cross sales, the passing of a customer's credit card information to a third party. More specifically, if webmasters have a free trial offer with a negative option, they might be violating the law.

"The best thing to do is to make sure you're not violating the law," Obenberger said.

He said the free trial offer may be flawed and suggested webmasters look at their terms of service and change the structure if necessary.

"This can be done legally and can be accommodated under the new statute," he added.

Another hot-button issue was the BitTorrent litigation, spearheaded by Evan Stone, who currently has 16 BitTorrent lawsuits pending.

"The sites that are hosting these file-sharing sites are located overseas, so the only alternative is to pursue the end users," Stone said.

Stone said his method of joining together hundreds of users in one lawsuit has worked fairly well, securing wins in most of his cases. He said in order for the case to work, he has to prove that all the pirates had worked together to download the infringing content.

But the one thing he didn't anticipate was the unwillingness of Internet service providers to give evidence such as the names and addresses of the infringers.

Randazza said he respectfully disagreed with Stone's methodology, saying that filing lawsuits against hundreds of BitTorrent users will more than likely get an unusual response from the presiding judge. He said he disagreed with filing the suits in jurisdictions that are comfortable for the attorneys.

"I'd rather go quietly and successfully rather than a big rumble," he said.

Piccionelli said he agreed that BitTorrent litigation is a way to stem the tide of copyright infringement, but not something that should be counted on as a new revenue stream.

He added content producers should consider a few things before going to court. For example, litigation may help producers improve their brand value. He also said producers need to do their homework to make sure how this can be done correctly.

In regards to obscenity prosecutions, Gelbard said he believed the Obscenity Prosecution Task Force, which prosecuted and lost the John Stagliano trial, has been disbanded.

But Obenberger said if that is true, it doesn't mean the pressure is off the adult industry.

"It doesn't mean the federal government isn't interested in porn prosecutions. They'll give the cases to more seasoned lawyers," he said.

The conversation then moved on to the latest developments with 2257.

"While we're making headway, you've got to make sure you're in compliance with 2257," Piccionelli said.

Obenberger added that if 2257 is ruled as constitutional, it will be enforced and there will be inspections.

"Please," he said. "90 percent of people aren't in compliance. If you don't comply, your day of reckoning is going to come."

The discussion then moved on to how 2257 can be used as a weapon in BitTorrent lawsuits where the infringer, who downloaded the illegal content, can be charged with violating the statute. Both Obenberger and Gelbard said this wasn't a good idea.

"It's dangerous to use 2257 as a sword when you're trying to show it's unconstitutional," Gelbard said.

In regards to .XXX, Obenberger said it would give the government too much power.

"It's a death switch. This is evil and it hurts freedom," he said.

Both Randazza and Piccionelli took a more subtle approach and agreed that if .XXX is approved by ICANN, the best thing is to perhaps come up with some kind of compromise and to at least get the two sides talking.

The panel did agree on one thing and that is anyone involved in adult should retain a lawyer who knows about their particular area and always get a second opinion.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Judge Dismisses Last NCOSE-Backed Suit Over Kansas AV Law

A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit alleging that adult site SuperPorn violated Kansas’ age verification law, citing lack of jurisdiction after similarly dismissing two related cases earlier this year.

ASACP Rolls Out 'Restricted to Adults' Labeling Tool Updates

The Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection (ASACP) has updated its Restricted to Adults (RTA) labeling system.

Federal AV Proposal Scores Minor Win in House but Remains in Doubt

A newly announced bipartisan agreement in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce may soon bring a proposed federal age verification law before the full House, but the measure continues to face an uphill battle.

Arizona Governor Vetoes 'Protect Act' With New Consent Provisions

Arizona Governor Kate Hobbs on Friday vetoed HB 2133, the “Protect Act,” which would have imposed new requirements for adult content uploaded online.

Brazil Begins Monitoring 18 Adult Sites for AV Compliance

Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) is now monitoring 18 high-traffic adult websites for compliance with the country’s Digital Statute for Children and Adolescents (Digital ECA), which requires such sites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Ofcom Fines First Time Videos $100,000 for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday imposed a fine of 80,000 pounds (more than $100,000) against First Time Videos, which operates FTVGirls.com and FTVMilfs.com, for failing to implement age checks required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

Curves Ahead: How BBW Creators are Turning Differentiation Into Competitive Advantage

For centuries, curves have been celebrated as a symbol of beauty, sensuality and power. From the soft opulence of Rubens paintings to the glamorous silhouettes of pinup icons, fuller figures have long occupied a place in art, fashion and fantasy.

Woodhull Freedom Foundation to Host Virtual 'Pride' Edition of 'Fact Checked' Series

Woodhull Freedom Foundation is hosting a Pride Month virtual edition of its series “Fact Checked by Woodhull.”

'InMelanin' Relaunches Through PAYSITE

InMelanin.com has officially relaunched through PAYSITE.

Pearl Industry Network Partners With Takedown Piracy

Industry trade group Pearl Industry Network (PiN) has officially partnered with Takedown Piracy.

Show More