Texas Justices Weighing Free Speech Rights With 'Pole Tax'

AUSTIN, Texas — Oral arguments are slated for March 25 in a Texas Supreme Court case that may decide whether the government can tax content protected by the 1st Amendment.

The issue at hand is the legality of charging a $5-per-person “pole tax” to customers of Texas’ 115 strip clubs and other adult entertainment venues, which Texas justices have decided to weigh.

The state, which has collected more than $12 million in fees that have been held in escrow pending the final outcome of the case, lost a round at court when a judge struck down the pole tax in March 2008. The state lost again in June when a state court of appeals decided the tax’s fate.

The law, passed in the 2007 legislative session, originally directed revenues collected from the fee toward sexual abuse and violence treatment and prevention programs, but it has been mired in legal challenges since it took effect.

Last year, an alternative measure was introduced that would include a 10 percent tax to those sexually oriented businesses that charge an admission fee. But the measure was postponed nine months ago.

That bill was hammered out with the help of members of the Texas Entertainment Association, an industry trade association for Texas strip-club owners.

Texas litigator David A. Furlow, who has represented businesses in numerous cases involving 1st Amendment protections, told the Houston Chronicle that the central issue of the pole tax is whether the government can levy a tax on speech.

“When you say certain types of messages and certain types of entertainment can be taxed, you begin down a slippery slope that can allow the government to destroy a form of business by taxing it out of existence,” he said.

To defend the law, the government has been forced to argue that strip clubs lead to greater violence against women, a claim for which there is no evidence, Furlow said.

The Utah Supreme Court upheld a similar law last year, ruling that taxing strip club patrons did not have the effect of restricting expression and served “an important state interest.”

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

CalExotics Expands 'Aura' Collection

CalExotics has expanded its Aura collection with three rechargeable bullet vibrators and two dual-action massagers.

Orion Debuts 5 New Styles From 'Cottelli Party' Line

Orion Wholesale has expanded its Cottelli Party line with five new styles.

California Legislature Passes Stricter UGC Rules for Adult Sites

A bill to impose tighter compliance standards for user-generated content (UGC) on adult websites has been approved by the California state legislature and now awaits the governor’s signature.

Blush Introduces 'Aurora' Dildo From Avant Line

Blush has debuted the Aurora dildo from its Avant Collection.

Womanizer Introduces 'Liberty 2 Leopard Edition' Stimulator

Womanizer has debuted its new Liberty 2 Leopard Edition clitoral stimulator.

Honey Play Box Taps Aly Kennel for Sales Rep Role

Honey Play Box has added Aly Kennel to its sales team.

Womanizer Debuts 'Beauty' Stimulator

Womanizer has debuted its new Womanizer Beauty clitoral stimulator.

California, Florida Reps File Latest Bill to Repeal Section 230

Two members of Congress on Thursday introduced new legislation to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

Svakom Introduces Custom Engraving for 'Klitty'

Svakom has introduced its new customizable engraving service for its Klitty vibrator.

Orion Expands 'NEK' Line

Orion Wholesale has expanded its NEK line with a new top and shorts.

Show More