Texas Justices Weighing Free Speech Rights With 'Pole Tax'

AUSTIN, Texas — Oral arguments are slated for March 25 in a Texas Supreme Court case that may decide whether the government can tax content protected by the 1st Amendment.

The issue at hand is the legality of charging a $5-per-person “pole tax” to customers of Texas’ 115 strip clubs and other adult entertainment venues, which Texas justices have decided to weigh.

The state, which has collected more than $12 million in fees that have been held in escrow pending the final outcome of the case, lost a round at court when a judge struck down the pole tax in March 2008. The state lost again in June when a state court of appeals decided the tax’s fate.

The law, passed in the 2007 legislative session, originally directed revenues collected from the fee toward sexual abuse and violence treatment and prevention programs, but it has been mired in legal challenges since it took effect.

Last year, an alternative measure was introduced that would include a 10 percent tax to those sexually oriented businesses that charge an admission fee. But the measure was postponed nine months ago.

That bill was hammered out with the help of members of the Texas Entertainment Association, an industry trade association for Texas strip-club owners.

Texas litigator David A. Furlow, who has represented businesses in numerous cases involving 1st Amendment protections, told the Houston Chronicle that the central issue of the pole tax is whether the government can levy a tax on speech.

“When you say certain types of messages and certain types of entertainment can be taxed, you begin down a slippery slope that can allow the government to destroy a form of business by taxing it out of existence,” he said.

To defend the law, the government has been forced to argue that strip clubs lead to greater violence against women, a claim for which there is no evidence, Furlow said.

The Utah Supreme Court upheld a similar law last year, ruling that taxing strip club patrons did not have the effect of restricting expression and served “an important state interest.”

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Honey Play Box, Dildos Assorted Ink European Distro Deal

Honey Play Box has signed a deal with Dildos Assorted (DA) for distribution throughout Southern Europe.

Calvista, Lovense Sign Exclusive Australia/New Zealand Distro Deal for 'Spinel'

Calvista has signed an exclusive Australian and New Zealand distribution deal for Lovense's Spinel thrusting and heating dildo.

Blush Introduces 'Riana' Vibe

Blush has debuted the Riana vibrator.

Lovense Debuts 'Spinel' Mini Sex Machine

Lovense has introduced its new app-controlled Spinel mini sex machine.

Strike 3 Rejects Meta 'Personal Use' Defense in AI Suit

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings this week responded to Facebook parent company Meta’s motion to dismiss Strike 3’s suit accusing Meta of pirating VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pornhub, Stripchat: VLOP Designation Based on Flawed Data

In separate cases, attorneys for Pornhub and Stripchat this week told the EU’s General Court that the European Commission relied on unreliable data when it classified the sites as “very large online platforms” (VLOPs) under the EU’s Digital Services Act, news organization MLex reports.

SVibe Debuts 'Gizi Pro' Vibrator

SVibe has introduced the new Gizi Pro vibrator.

Lovense Launches AI Companion

Lovense has launched its AI Companion.

Orion Unveils New Styles From 'NEK' Line

Orion Wholesale has released two new styles from its NEK line.

Screaming O, Dynamo Wellness Sign Canadian Distro Deal With EP Products

Screaming O and Dynamo Wellness have signed a deal with Canadian distributor EP Products.

Show More