Texas Justices Weighing Free Speech Rights With 'Pole Tax'

AUSTIN, Texas — Oral arguments are slated for March 25 in a Texas Supreme Court case that may decide whether the government can tax content protected by the 1st Amendment.

The issue at hand is the legality of charging a $5-per-person “pole tax” to customers of Texas’ 115 strip clubs and other adult entertainment venues, which Texas justices have decided to weigh.

The state, which has collected more than $12 million in fees that have been held in escrow pending the final outcome of the case, lost a round at court when a judge struck down the pole tax in March 2008. The state lost again in June when a state court of appeals decided the tax’s fate.

The law, passed in the 2007 legislative session, originally directed revenues collected from the fee toward sexual abuse and violence treatment and prevention programs, but it has been mired in legal challenges since it took effect.

Last year, an alternative measure was introduced that would include a 10 percent tax to those sexually oriented businesses that charge an admission fee. But the measure was postponed nine months ago.

That bill was hammered out with the help of members of the Texas Entertainment Association, an industry trade association for Texas strip-club owners.

Texas litigator David A. Furlow, who has represented businesses in numerous cases involving 1st Amendment protections, told the Houston Chronicle that the central issue of the pole tax is whether the government can levy a tax on speech.

“When you say certain types of messages and certain types of entertainment can be taxed, you begin down a slippery slope that can allow the government to destroy a form of business by taxing it out of existence,” he said.

To defend the law, the government has been forced to argue that strip clubs lead to greater violence against women, a claim for which there is no evidence, Furlow said.

The Utah Supreme Court upheld a similar law last year, ruling that taxing strip club patrons did not have the effect of restricting expression and served “an important state interest.”

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Odin Debuts 'Naughty Fan' Collection

Odin Novelties has introduced its Naughty Fan collection.

Appeals Court Upholds Section 230 Immunity in XVideos Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has upheld a lower court’s ruling that Section 230 protects WebGroup Czech Republic from liability in a case involving user-uploaded CSAM on its tube sites.

Adam & Eve Reveals Results of 'Sexual Discussion' Survey

Adam & Eve has released the results of a survey asking respondents how comfortable they were discussing sex.

JustFor.fans Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has ruled in favor of fan site JustFor.fans in a case against a website using an infringing domain.

Odin Expands 'Kong Benderz' Dildo Collection

Odin Novelties has expanded its Kong Benderz collection with the addition of a new dildo.

Orion Debuts 'Vibepad Intense 2' Vibrator

Orion Wholesale has introduced the second edition of its Vibepad Intense vibrator.

Aylo Moves to Settle Two 'Children of Pornhub' Class-Action Lawsuits

Aylo has agreed to terms for a settlement with the plaintiffs in two long-running class actions over allegations that former Pornhub parent company MindGeek knowingly allowed and profited from CSAM on its sites.

Full Circle Brings Back 'Baby' Bullet Vibe Collection

Full Circle has re-released its Baby collection of three bullet vibrators.

Odin Debuts 'Besties' Dildo Collection

Odin Novelties has debuted its new Besties collection of silicone dildos.

Sustory Introduces 'Lennox' Vibrating Anal Beads

Pleasure brand Sustory has introduced Lennox, its new progressive vibrating anal bead system.

Show More