Texas Justices Weighing Free Speech Rights With 'Pole Tax'

AUSTIN, Texas — Oral arguments are slated for March 25 in a Texas Supreme Court case that may decide whether the government can tax content protected by the 1st Amendment.

The issue at hand is the legality of charging a $5-per-person “pole tax” to customers of Texas’ 115 strip clubs and other adult entertainment venues, which Texas justices have decided to weigh.

The state, which has collected more than $12 million in fees that have been held in escrow pending the final outcome of the case, lost a round at court when a judge struck down the pole tax in March 2008. The state lost again in June when a state court of appeals decided the tax’s fate.

The law, passed in the 2007 legislative session, originally directed revenues collected from the fee toward sexual abuse and violence treatment and prevention programs, but it has been mired in legal challenges since it took effect.

Last year, an alternative measure was introduced that would include a 10 percent tax to those sexually oriented businesses that charge an admission fee. But the measure was postponed nine months ago.

That bill was hammered out with the help of members of the Texas Entertainment Association, an industry trade association for Texas strip-club owners.

Texas litigator David A. Furlow, who has represented businesses in numerous cases involving 1st Amendment protections, told the Houston Chronicle that the central issue of the pole tax is whether the government can levy a tax on speech.

“When you say certain types of messages and certain types of entertainment can be taxed, you begin down a slippery slope that can allow the government to destroy a form of business by taxing it out of existence,” he said.

To defend the law, the government has been forced to argue that strip clubs lead to greater violence against women, a claim for which there is no evidence, Furlow said.

The Utah Supreme Court upheld a similar law last year, ruling that taxing strip club patrons did not have the effect of restricting expression and served “an important state interest.”

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Magic Silk Expands 'Exposed' Line With 'Blue Sky' Collection

Magic Silk has expanded its Exposed line of lingerie with the Blue Sky collection.

Male Power Debuts 'Fishnet 2.0' Collection

Male Power has introduced its new Fishnet 2.0 collection of men's underwear.

OTouch Announces '2nd Generation' Masturbators

OTouch has announced the launch of its second-generation strokers.

Orion Unveils New 'Kink Royal' Collection From 'Noir Handmade' Line

Orion Wholesale has introduced the Kink Royal collection from its Noir Handmade line.

Florida Congressman Files Latest Bill to Repeal Section 230

Rep. Jimmy Patronis of Florida has become the latest member of Congress to propose legislation that would repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

Williams Trading Releases 2026 'Valentine's Day Essentials' Catalog

Williams Trading Co. has released its new 2026 Valentine’s Day Essentials catalog.

Le Wand 'Lick' Vibrator Featured in Wired Review

Le Wand's Lick three-in-one vibrator is featured in a new review on Wired.com.

We-Vibe Debuts 2 New Vibrating Cock Rings

We-Vibe has introduced its new Pivot 2 and Verge 2 vibrating cock rings.

Lovense Debuts 'Lush Anal' Vibrator

Lovense has introduced its new app-controlled Lush Anal vibrator.

Irish Parliamentary Committee Weighs Stricter AV Laws

The Irish national parliament’s Joint Committee on Arts, Media, Communications, Culture and Sport met Wednesday to discuss regulation of online platforms and improving online safety, including calls for stricter age verification by adult sites.

Show More