New 3rd-Party Processor Takes Old Name — iBill

AURORA, Colo. — While the online adult community might just shake their heads on this one, it’s true — the iBill brand is back.

The new Aurora, Colo.-based third-party processor is fighting back claims that it has direct ties to the defunct Deerfield, Fla., company with the same name that left scores of online adult companies unpaid and hundreds of legal claims unresolved.

Jonas C. Brown, who holds the title of executive vice president of security for the new firm, told XBIZ that company investors knew coming into the third-party processing game that it might be rough dealing with the never-forgetting adult webmaster community that so far has mostly blasted the company on message-board postings.

“There’s still a lot of bad taste in the air,” Brown said. “Originally iBill did well with the adult companies, but when it was sold that’s when everything started to crumble.”

The defunct processor's tangled mess dates back to its notification by First Data Merchant Services that it was dropping the original iBill from its merchant account. The original iBill tried to secure another merchant account holder and, according to some, failed to tell clients.

Years ago, the original iBill was one of the top third-party processors; today, investors of the new firm, incorporated as a Nevada company but based in Colorado, are making strides — slowly — into the adult processing biz.

“It’s going to take months of rebuilding the name and image, but we think it’s worth it,” Brown said. “None of the management or executive team with the original company have anything to do with this one. In fact, I wouldn’t know where to reach any of the former execs.”

He noted, however, that he worked at the defunct iBill for five years in the early parts of the decade before it was hit with scandal. So did one of the new company’s programmers.

The new iBill, which was planned much of last year, opened shop for mainstream accounts in February and officially marketed to adult companies in April.

Brown said that investors scooped up iBill’s trademark after the defunct company let the name expire and then completed an acquisition for the iBill.net domain for $14,500 from an employee of the original processor (the old iBill used iBill.com as its URL).

The company currently services about 20 adult websites and more than 40 mainstream customers, using two accounts with a European payment processing company Brown wouldn’t disclose with the exception that it is near London. Oddly, that European processor has only one exclusion: any reference to “teens” in websites.

The new iBill offers a five percent per transaction fee with a five percent six-month reserve for a period of six months. It processes MasterCard and Visa, and is in negotiations to add Discover and JCB.

Brown said that it is finding some immediate success with taking backlinks with the old iBill name and redirecting them, if the site owner approves.

But Brown said he’s only interested in “the long-term” and is hopeful that he can educate the online adult community about the new company’s offerings.

“Look, there’s a history to the name and a lot of people remember the name,” he said. “Out of every 20 people I talk to about our services, only one will give me a hard time over what transpired with the old iBill.

“At one point, there was so much hate mail, but over time I’ve noticed a huge tone-down. It’s getting a lot less negative.”

On promoting the new iBill, Brown said the company hasn’t really done any advertising, with the exception of message-board promotions, but he’s open to meeting with webmasters at the adult trade shows — with one caveat.

“If we get a booth, I might have to bring a bulletproof vest,” he said.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Drops Florida AV Lawsuit in Wake of SCOTUS Decision

A U.S. district court judge granted on Tuesday a motion by Free Speech Coalition to dismiss the trade association’s lawsuit over Florida’s age verification law, a case that had been on hold pending the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the constitutionality of state AV laws.

Ukrainian President Responds to Porn Legalization Petition

President Volodymyr Zelensky responded Tuesday to an OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine, stating that he would wait for the legislative process to play out “in accordance with established procedure.”

Only Tax Deductions Joins Pineapple Support as Sponsor

Adult industry accounting firm Only Tax Deductions has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Adult Empire Launches 'Conversations' Podcast Series

Adult Empire has launched a new official podcast series hosted by Nicole Chappelle and Charlie.

Sex Work CEO Launches 'Teams Plan' for AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Teams Plan for its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

2025 XBIZ Amsterdam Website Launches With Call for Speakers

XBIZ is pleased to announce that the website for its annual European conference, XBIZ Amsterdam, is now live.

NC Governor Vetoes Bill Targeting Adult Industry, Override Possible

North Carolina Governor Josh Stein today vetoed a bill imposing new regulations that adult industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

25,000 Sign Petition to Legalize Pornography in Ukraine

An OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine has amassed the 25,000 signatures required for official consideration by President Volodymyr Zelensky.

WannaCollab Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

WannaCollab has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

Show More