eHarmony Lacks 'Scientific' Date-Matching System, Suit Says

LOS ANGELES — eHarmony.com says it has a "scientifically proven system" to match its customers with appropriate partners but, according to a lawsuit, it has no such system.

The suit, filed at U.S. District Court in Los Angeles on Friday, seeks class-action status and alleges that because eHarmony has no matchmatching system, consumers are oftentimes hooked up with scam artists.

Plaintiffs Lynda Kelly of Northern California and Miranda Soegi of Los Angeles said they both were duped by the online-matchmaking company because “rather than using a rigorous matching system and other procedures that ‘make sure only sincere singles seeking long-term relationships are matched,’ eHarmony did not employ any meaningful measures.”

Kelly, the suit noted, was hooked up with a scam artist from somewhere in the African continent whose only intent was to steal money.

A one-month subscription to eHarmony costs about $60, but longer subscriptions are cheaper.

The federal suit, which seeks $5 million in damages, claims Pasadena, Calif.-based eHarmony’s advertising is misleading and the company is in violation of California’s Unfair Business Act.

“eHarmony has marketed itself, and has been able to charge premium prices for its services in the marketplace by claiming that its patented matching technology is based on more than 35 years of empirical and clinical research on what goes into successful relationships [bringing] together singles using a scientifically proven set of compatibility principles,” the suit claims.

But "eHarmony has known about the deficiencies in its matching system as it always has known that it could not ensure its members that their matches were safe and compatible," the suit said.

eHarmony spokeswoman Pamela Holmgren said that the accusations by the pair are bogus but would not elaborate.

"We will defend this case vigorously," she told XBIZ. "We have reviewed the complaint and believe its allegations are baseless and meritless."

eHarmony earlier this month launched Compatible Partners, which is marketed to gays and lesbians.

The company launched the division after a settlement with the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office, which claimed eHarmony violated the state’s Law Against Discrimination by not offering a same-sex matching service.

In the settlement, eHarmony denied violating the law, claiming its business model has been based on its expertise. The company said it has researched thousands of opposite-sex marriages to understand what makes opposite-sex couples compatible.

eHarmony was founded in 2000 by Dr. Neil Clark Warren, a clinical psychologist with once-close ties to the Christian evangelical group Focus on the Family.

eHarmony offers its services in the U.S., Australia, Britain and Canada.

Its website says that 236 eHarmony members marry every day in the U.S. as a result of being matched on the site using eHarmony's patented "Compatibility Matching System."

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Show More