Well-known in New Zealand both for his Vixen enterprises and for creating the Erotica Adult Lifestyle Expo, Crow said the new publication will not be publishing porn, but instead will focus on exposing the “naked truth” behind a variety of issues, political and otherwise.
"I think New Zealanders are beginning to realize that much of the information that they get from the mainstream comes with an agenda that involves staying away from or spinning the big issues,” said Crow. “This new magazine is simply about presenting the facts exactly as they are…and 'outing' those who seek to corrupt or hide it from us for their own purposes."
Crow has made a name for himself in recent years with challenges to New Zealand’s censorship laws, frequently slamming the local government for what he sees as a political entity ripe with double standards and Victorian attitudes. In 2002, for example, he won a highly controversial case that allowed Vixen to produce an adult film featuring a live birth, a film he never actually made but fought on principle.
He also frequently argues, oddly enough, that censors approve hardcore homosexual porn but not hardcore heterosexual porn, suggesting Chief and Deputy Chief Censors are biased because both officials are openly gay.
Crow said the idea for “Uncensored” came to fruition when officials in the New Zealand government began talks of outlawing “hate speech” last year. The magazine, he said, reflects concerns that many forms of censorship in New Zealand are widespread.
"For example, it is a fact that mammograms may actually cause cancer and that the oil is not running out,” said Crow, referring to two hot topics in the New Zealand press of late.
“[Also] nowhere in mainstream media have we learned the facts about what really happened on 9/11.”
In its premier issue, “Uncensored” will present arguments that the terrorist attacks on September 11 were orchestrated by a cabal of U.S. government insiders who wanted to create a new Pearl Harbor to justify U.S.-led wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. Another article will argue that the Ministry of Health in New Zealand purposefully released an “inadequately tested vaccine” in order to manufacture a market for its new drug.
