opinion

Billers Beware of Dormant Accounts

Billers Beware of Dormant Accounts

Winter is the time when many things go dormant. Animals like bears, chipmunks and raccoons take little breaks when the weather gets cold. Certain plants and insects also slow down. In the payments world, however, dormancy can be a problem.

A dormant account is considered any account with no activity for greater than 90 days and/or no commitment of future activity. These inactive accounts can cause headaches for compliance teams and acquirers — and cause financial challenges for you.

Showing a large number of dormant accounts to regulators creates concerns and requires explanation as to why these accounts are inactive and the rationale behind keeping them open.

When I first started my payments business 18 years ago, it was hard to convince merchants to switch over from a competitor to give us a try. When you’re new, everyone is hesitant to take that leap of faith and do business with a company with little history. To get our foot in the door, we would encourage a merchant to set us up as their “backup” provider. We even had an internal joke that we were everyone’s favorite secondary provider.

Little did I know that, years later, being someone’s No. 2 would mean carrying dead weight and increasing risks in our client profile with our partners. So while we still support dreamers and startups, there needs to be a firm commitment on the merchant’s side to deliver. Unfortunately, if those deliverables are not met, we are left in a situation where we are incurring costs and risks.

Recently, our head of compliance brought it to my attention that any “dormant” accounts we had on the books would need to be closed. While we have long outgrown our initial strategy of “give us a try” to gain new business, we do occasionally still have merchants that go through that onboarding process but take many months to move us to their development queue. I’m sure others have experienced this as well. This month, we look at the challenges of these dormant accounts and why it’s so important to clean them up.

Cost of Setup

Setting up a new account takes considerable time and effort from both the merchant and the payment service provider. The merchant invests their time getting the site ready for the new payment service provider by adding disclosures and making sure the content meets both the payment service provider and bank’s standards. The payment service provider has to provide dedicated staff members for the onboarding process, to review the business model and websites as well as identify and verify the ownership and control structure of the merchant entity.

They have to invest in third-party onboarding compliance tools to validate directors, UBOs, the associated bank accounts, and check and scan the site. Merchants pay high-risk registration fees of up to 1,500 dollars upfront.

Maintenance Fees

Here’s the big issue with dormant accounts: there are ongoing costs for payment service providers and acquirers. Once the merchant has been approved for processing, there are maintenance monitoring fees that are imposed by the acquirer and payment service provider, and they occur even when the account is inactive. These fees include monthly URL scans, global sanctions and enforcement checks, and adverse media monitoring of the entity including its UBOs and directors. From a regulatory standpoint, acquirers and payment service providers are required to risk-score merchants and perform periodic KYB (know your business) and ODD (ongoing due diligence) checks, which look at each merchant file to make sure things like proof of ID, proof of address, banks and other corporate documents are up to date.

All these documents have to be gathered by staff and validated. There is also a recurring effort on time and costs associated with periodic checks on these inactive accounts. This means compliance teams need to validate and ensure all scans are updated with the correct data. When the account is dormant, it is a lot of work and cost for no return. The reality is, it’s much easier to shut down the account than to invest the resources to make sure the account is compliant.

Risky Business

Dormant accounts also create additional risk for acquirers and payment service providers. Fraudsters will often maintain inactive accounts, hoping they will fall off the enhanced monitoring of the acquirer or payment service provider. Then, later on, a bad merchant will slam the inactive account with fraudulent transactions. There is also a risk that dormant accounts can be used to help launder funds in the future, if a bad merchant suddenly activates the account to receive proceeds for illegal activities.

On the regulatory side, most banks expect quarterly reporting of your merchant base. Showing a large number of dormant accounts to regulators creates concerns and requires explanation as to why these accounts are inactive and the rationale behind keeping them open.

Let’s face it, time is money. As a merchant, investing your team’s time to meet all the onboarding and KYB/ODD requirements, paying the initial fees and investing your technical resources to integrate but then not use the account is not very efficient. If you have set up a direct account with a bank, you will incur monthly fees for inactivity and you will be put through the paces annually during the required KYB/ODD updates acquirers and payment service providers must complete. Lastly, it is also considered a best practice by the card brands and acquirers to keep inactive accounts to a minimum.

As with everything in life, we must use our time wisely. Making sure we invest resources where there is a return is important for merchants, payment service providers and acquirers.

Cathy Beardsley is president and CEO of Segpay, a merchant services provider offering a wide range of custom financial solutions including payment facilitator, direct merchant accounts and secure gateway services. Under her direction, Segpay has become one of four companies approved by Visa to operate as a high-risk internet payment services provider. Segpay offers secure turnkey solutions to accept online payments, with a guarantee that funds are kept safe and protected with its proprietary Fraud Mitigation System and customer service and support. For any questions or help, contact sales@segpay.com or compliance@segpay.com.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

From Compliance to Confidence: The Future of Safety in Adult Platforms

In numerous countries and U.S. states, laws now require platforms to prevent minors from accessing age-inappropriate material. But the need for safeguarding doesn’t end with age verification. Today’s online landscape also places adult companies at uniquely high risk for inadvertently facilitating exploitation, abuse or reputational harm, or of being accused of doing so.

Andy Lulham ·
opinion

What Adult Businesses Need to Know About Florida's Age Verification Law

The rise and proliferation of age verification laws has changed the landscape for the online adult industry. A recent and compelling example is the state of Florida, where Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed multiple complaints against major platforms as well as affiliates accused of violating the state’s AV law.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Maintaining Brand Trust in the Face of Negative Press

Over the last year, several of our merchants have found themselves caught up in litigation over compliance with state age verification laws. Recently, Segpay itself was pulled into the spotlight, facing scrutiny over Florida’s AV statute, HB 3. These stories inevitably get picked up by both industry and mainstream news outlets.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How to Switch Payment Processors Without Disrupting Business

For many merchants, the idea of switching payment processors can feel pretty overwhelming. That’s understandable. After all, downtime can stall sales, recurring subscriptions can suddenly fail, or compliance gaps can put accounts at risk. Operating in a high-risk sector like the adult industry can further amplify the stress of transition.

Jonathan Corona ·
profile

WIA Profile: Katie

Katie is the ultimate girl’s girl. As community manager at Chaturbate, she answers DMs, remembers names, and shows up for creators and fellow businesswomen when it counts. She’s quick to credit the people around her, and careful to make space for others in every room she enters.

Women in Adult ·
opinion

How to Stay Legally Protected When Policies Get Outdated

The adult industry has long operated in a complex legal environment subject to rapid change. Now, a confluence of age verification laws, lawsuits, credit card processing and data privacy rules has created an urgent need for all industry participants — from major platforms to independent creators — to review and potentially overhaul their legal and operational policies.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

From Compliance Chaos to Crypto Clarity: Making the Case for Digital Payments in Adult

These are uncertain times for adult merchants. With compliance tightening and age verification mandates rising, the barrier to entry keeps getting higher.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Real-Time Insights to Streamline E-Payments and Stop Lost Sales

A slow checkout process is more than just annoying — it’s expensive. In a high-risk sector like the adult industry, even small delays or declined transactions can cost businesses thousands in lost revenue every month.

Jonathan Corona ·
profile

FSC's Valentine Leads Charge for Sex Worker Rights and Financial Access

Before ever stepping into a courtroom, Valentine already understood the power of presence. After all, they’ve shimmied on stages as a burlesque performer, consulted behind the scenes for creative businesses and moved through the adult industry not just as an advocate, but as a participant.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

Breaking Down HB 805 and How it Affects the Adult Industry

North Carolina House Bill 805 was enacted July 29, after the state legislature overrode Governor Josh Stein’s veto. The provisions that relate to the adult industry, imposing requirements for age verification, consent and content removal, are scheduled to become effective Dec. 1. Platforms have until then to update their policies and systems to comply with the new regulations.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
Show More