opinion

The Scarlet Letter Returns With Stigmatizing AB 2389

The Scarlet Letter Returns With Stigmatizing AB 2389

In 1850, Nathaniel Hawthorne published one of the greatest literary creations in history: “The Scarlet Letter: A Romance.” The novel tells the story of Hester Prynne, who conceives a daughter through an affair and then struggles to create a new life of repentance and dignity. She is required to wear a scarlet “A” on her dress when she is in front of townspeople to shame her. If you haven’t had the opportunity to read this literary classic, then I encourage you to visit your nearest library or Amazon.com. As you read “The Scarlet Letter” story for the first time, you’ll be hard-pressed not to consider its similarities to what has been proposed in AB 2389.

In February 2020 and about 170 years after the release of Hawthorne’s novel, California Assembly Members Cristina Garcia and Lorena Gonzalez introduced Assembly Bill 2389 (“AB 2389”). Initially, AB 2389 required any person working “… as an entertainer at an adult entertainment business or as a performer in any adult entertainment video, including, but not limited to, internet web-camming sites …” to pay for and engage in training every three years, to be fingerprinted and obtain a valid business license. Almost immediately after its public release, AB 2389 was promptly attacked by virtually every member of the adult entertainment industry, including performers, writers, producers and lawyers. Mainstream media outlets also aggressively reported on the negative reception AB 2389 received.

This is an attack on freedom of speech and expression and thankfully, if the State of California erroneously decides to pass this disgraceful bill, first amendment attorneys will be lined up to take on this fight.

Shortly after the widespread backlash, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez quickly announced that she would pull her name from the legislation. Also, in light of the public backlash, Assembly Member Cristina Garcia amended AB 2389 to remove the requirements for fingerprinting and obtaining a work license. Regardless of the amendments, AB 2389 still requires any person seeking to work in the adult entertainment business, to obtain a “certificate of training completion issued by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement.” AB 2389 is nothing more than another attempt to force anyone in the State of California seeking to legally engage in the adult entertainment industry to have to be subjected to potential humiliation, embarrassment and unnecessary hurdles while scarifying that person’s first amendment rights. Why not just skip all the tip-toeing and propose a law that requires all adult entertainers to be forced to tattoo a scarlet “A” to their chests?

Since first reading AB 2389 I’d been scratching my head trying to figure out what Assemblywoman Garcia was thinking and so common sense told me that the place to start would be to research what Assemblywoman Garcia was thinking herself. It didn’t take me long to reach the conclusion that Assemblywoman Garcia has little to no understanding of the adult entertainment industry when she released a statement indicating: “My goal is that the training required by AB 2389 will result in a certification process similar to that of other industries. For example, the food service industry requires a food handlers training course, in which workers complete a training course and at the end take a quiz. Upon passing the quiz, they are certified food handlers in this state.” I really can’t think of a worse comparison for Assemblywoman Garcia to have made and I’m not remotely surprised that the former co-sponsor of AB 2389 is running for cover.

I’m going to take this opportunity to be blunt. I don’t really care that Assemblywoman Garcia amended the bill to remove the fingerprinting and licensing requirements. The very fact that anyone would ever think that requiring an adult entertainer to be fingerprinted and licensed prior to working in the adult entertainment industry tells you exactly what Assemblywoman Garcia’s intentions are. One can only conclude that Assemblywoman Garcia wanted to be able to identify, track and regulate adult entertainers. AB 2389’s intent is clear; it is yet another hurdle for a person to clear before they knowingly and willfully work in the adult entertainment industry. This is an attack on freedom of speech and expression and thankfully, if the State of California erroneously decides to pass this disgraceful bill, first amendment attorneys will be lined up to take on this fight.

California residents and adult entertainers shouldn’t be surprised at the State of California once again targeting the adult entertainment industry — 2012 brought Los Angeles’ mandatory testing statute (Measure B) and of course 2016 brought the failed Proposition 60. In terms of long-term planning, my office continues to advise adult entertainers to be prepared to fight for the ability to engage in your chosen trade and it truly is a shame that politicians seemingly want to make adult entertainers feel as unwelcome as possible.

It’s very important to note that at this time, AB 2389 is nothing more than a proposed bill and there is plenty to do by every individual potentially affected by this horrendous proposed law. Comment publicly, work with the various adult industry associations working against AB 2389 and submit letters objecting to the bill to Assemblywoman Garcia and your local assemblyperson.

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and the Adult Industry Laborers & Artists Association (AILAA) are doing everything they can to try to stop AB 2389, but they continue to need your support. If you haven’t done so already, I encourage you to become a member of both organizations and follow their suggestions for how and what you can do to help stop AB 2389.

This article does not constitute legal advice and is provided for your information only and should not be relied upon in lieu of consultation with legal advisors in your own jurisdiction. It may not be current as the laws in this area change frequently. Transmission of the information contained in this article is not intended to create, and the receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver.

Corey D. Silverstein is the managing and founding member of Silverstein Legal. His practice focuses on representing all areas of the adult industry and his clientele includes hosting companies, affiliate programs, content producers, processors, designers, developers, operators and more. He is licensed in numerous jurisdictions including Michigan, Arizona, the District of Colombia, Georgia and New York. Contact him at MyAdultAttorney.com, corey@myadultattorney.com and (248) 290-0655.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

profile

BranditScan's Aerie Saunders on Fostering Creator Knowledge, Confidence and Community

Aerie Saunders is firmly in her season. When she sits down with XBIZ, a fall-scented WoodWick candle burns in the background, pumpkins decorate her desk and the first signs of spooky season are already on display. Not that Saunders waits until autumn to embrace the macabre.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

What Mastercard's Scam Monitoring Program Means for Adult Merchants

Mastercard's Scam Merchant Monitoring Program (SMMP) has introduced a new, investigation-led framework that works very differently from the ratio-based chargeback programs the industry has relied on for years. It applies to card-not-present merchants globally, and Mastercard's guidance on business models warranting closer attention includes adult content and dating platforms, along with subscription services, digital goods and forex.

Len Garcia ·
opinion

Why the Right Merchant Category Code Matters for NSFW AI Businesses

You explained exactly what your NSFW AI business does to your payment processor and they seemed to get it. The underwriting process felt thorough and exhausting, but it was well worth it because you began processing.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

How Local Payments Can Expand Access and Reduce Friction at Checkout

Global adult platforms often enter new markets with a familiar assumption: If their checkout accepts major cards, they're ready for local customers. In reality, payment habits vary widely by country. Dutch consumers use iDEAL for online shopping, BLIK is a leading e-commerce payment method in Poland, and India's UPI handles billions of transactions each month.

Mitch Platt ·
opinion

How Detailed Receipts Build Consumer Trust and Reduce Chargeback

When was the last time you bought something online? Chances are you looked for the confirmation almost immediately. Did the transaction go through? Does it show what you bought? Were you charged correctly? And if there's a problem, who can you contact?

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

What Adult Platforms Should Know About the EU AI Act

The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act is now largely in force, creating new obligations for adult platforms using AI for content creation, performer verification, age estimation, moderation and other functions.

Corey Silverstein ·
profile

Verifymy's Emma Robert-Tissot on Putting People at the Heart of Online Safety

Warm, friendly and always happy to help, Emma Robert-Tissot has a gift for making even the most complex corners of online safety feel approachable.

Jackie Backman ·
profile

YourVids' Gino on Listening, Learning and Putting Creators First

Get Gino talking about the work creators pour into their careers, and his passion quickly becomes contagious. He deeply appreciates the people powering the business and has firm ideas about what they deserve in return.

Jackie Backman ·
profile

Vendo CEO Mitch Platt Reflects on 20 Years of Lessons and Evolution

More than 20 years ago, three entrepreneurs in Barcelona began gathering over beers to pitch, dissect and routinely destroy one another's business ideas. The ritual was simple: One person arrived with a concept, while the other two tried to expose every weakness. Any proposal that survived earned another look. Most did not.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

How to Avoid the Hidden Risks of AI-Generated Legal Documents

Artificial intelligence can write a contract in seconds, but that does not mean it can write the contract your business actually needs. Across the adult industry, operators, creators and producers are increasingly using generative AI to prepare model releases, performer agreements, privacy policies, takedown notices, employment documents and responses to regulators. The appeal is obvious: Legal work is expensive, AI is fast and the resulting document often looks impressively professional. That polished appearance is exactly what makes the practice dangerous.

Corey Silverstein ·
Show More