opinion

Red Alert: The EU Copyright Directive

Red Alert: The EU Copyright Directive

If you operate a tube style platform such as YouTube, your world is about to change courtesy of the European Parliament. Less than a year after the GDPR became enforceable, Europe is at it again and this time, tube sites are the primary target.

On March 27, 2019, the European Parliament voted to adopt the European Union Directive on Copyright in the Single Market (the “Directive”) which was first introduced in 2016. The vote tally was 348 to 274 with 36 abstentions. The Directive, which is commonly being referred to as “Article 13” or “Article 17” (note that Articles 13 and 17 are only two parts of the Directive and the Directive has other controversial components) puts more responsibility on services that permit user-submitted content such as YouTube and social media platforms, to stop the sharing of copyright-infringing content.

Tube sites, social media sites and any other adult website that permits user submitted content needs to be on guard and start planning immediately. This is going to be a game changer.

The Directive was fiercely contested by some of the biggest tech companies in the world, including Google, who argued that the new rules would be catastrophic for Europe’s creative and digital economies. Twitter is also concerned about the potential impact on the “open, creative and conversational nature of the internet.” Meanwhile, copyright holders such as Paul McCartney support and argue that the Directive is meant to compensate copyright holders for the works that they created.

The 64 pages of amendments adopted for the Directive can be viewed online at EuroParl.Europa.eu, in addition to a press release titled “Questions and Answers on Issues about the Digital Copyright Directive,” which I encourage everyone to read.

Currently, copyright holders are required to flag alleged copyright violations … but under the Directive, online platforms will be required to filter or remove copyrighted material from their websites without having to receive notice from copyright holders. The Directive makes online platforms and aggregator sites liable for copyright infringement.

Large tube style websites are seriously concerned because they aren’t even sure how they are expected to identify and remove copyrighted content in accordance with the Directive. Many are arguing that the Directive will force platforms to develop and implement software that would screen/review content before it is uploaded to begin with. This type of software would be incredibly difficult and expensive to create and platforms are already questioning whether it’s even technically feasible.

Article 17 did carve out specific types of platforms that are excluded from the Directive including i) Not-for-profit online encyclopedias (example wikipedia.com); ii) Not-for-profit educational and scientific repositories; iii) Open source software-developing and -sharing platforms; Electronic communication service providers as defined in Directive (EU) 2018/1972; iv) Online marketplaces; and v) Business-to-business cloud services and cloud services that allow users to upload content for their own use (example, Dropbox.com).

From a procedural standpoint, following the approval from a majority of EU countries (which is expected to occur next month), each country that is part of the European Union (presently 28) will have to independently create laws that reflect the Directive within two years (Article 29). This means that each country has the ability to interpret and implement the Directive in its own way and website operators may end up with 28 different laws to comply with. This process will most certainly take time and be met with substantial legal challenges.

The entire adult entertainment industry needs to be closely monitoring the Directive and its implementation by European Union member nations. Tube sites, social media sites and any other adult website that permits user submitted content needs to be on guard and start planning immediately. This is going to be a game changer.

This article does not constitute legal advice and is provided for your information only and should not be relied upon in lieu of consultation with legal advisors in your own jurisdiction. It may not be current as the laws in this area change frequently. Transmission of the information contained in this article is not intended to create, and the receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver.

Corey D. Silverstein is the managing and founding member of the Law Offices of Corey D. Silverstein, P.C. His practice focuses on representing all areas of the adult industry and his clientele includes hosting companies, affiliate programs, content producers, processors, designers, developers, operators and more. He is licensed in numerous jurisdictions including Michigan, Arizona, the District of Colombia, Georgia and New York. Contact him at MyAdultAttorney.com, corey@silversteinlegal.com and (248) 290-0655.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

How Adult Businesses Can Navigate Global Compliance Demands

The internet has made the world feel small. Case in point: Adult websites based in the U.S. are now getting letters from regulators demanding compliance with foreign laws, even if they don’t operate in those countries. Meanwhile, some U.S. website operators dealing with the patchwork of state-level age verification laws have considered incorporating offshore in the hopes of avoiding these new obligations — but even operators with no physical presence in the U.S. have been sued or threatened with claims for not following state AV laws.

Larry Walters ·
opinion

Top Tips for Bulletproof Creator Management Contracts

The creator management business is booming. Every week, it seems, a new agency emerges, promising to turn creators into stars, automate their fan interactions or triple their revenue through “secret” social strategies. The reality? Many of these agencies are operating with contracts that wouldn’t survive a single serious dispute — if they even have contracts at all.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Building Sustainable Revenue Without Opt-Out Cross-Sales

Over the past year, we’ve seen growing pushback from acquirers on merchants using opt-out cross-sales — also known as negative option offers. This has been especially noticeable in the U.S. In fact, one of our acquirers now declines new merchants during onboarding if an opt-out flow is detected. Existing merchants submitting new URLs with opt-out cross-sales are being asked to remove them.

Cathy Beardsley ·
trends

How to Handle Payment Disputes Without Sacrificing Trust

You can run the best-managed and most compliant website out there, but that still doesn’t completely shield you from the risks tied to payment disputes. Buyer’s remorse, an unclear billing description or even a simple misunderstanding can lead a customer to dispute a transaction. Accumulate enough disputes, and both your reputation and revenue could be at risk.

Jonathan Corona ·
trends

WIA Profile: Taylor Moore

With a 70-person team and a growing slate of tools for content creators, the Teasy Agency has developed a reputation for putting talent first. That commitment owes a lot to co-founder Taylor Moore’s own experiences as a cam model.

Jackie Backman ·
profile

WIA Profile: Cathy Turns Creator Platform Experience Into a Model-First Playbook

As both a model and industry executive, Cathy lives in two worlds at once. “Since I do both things, I can act as the liaison between the model community and the rest of the SextPanther team,” she tells XBIZ.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

From Compliance to Confidence: The Future of Safety in Adult Platforms

In numerous countries and U.S. states, laws now require platforms to prevent minors from accessing age-inappropriate material. But the need for safeguarding doesn’t end with age verification. Today’s online landscape also places adult companies at uniquely high risk for inadvertently facilitating exploitation, abuse or reputational harm, or of being accused of doing so.

Andy Lulham ·
opinion

What Adult Businesses Need to Know About Florida's Age Verification Law

The rise and proliferation of age verification laws has changed the landscape for the online adult industry. A recent and compelling example is the state of Florida, where Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed multiple complaints against major platforms as well as affiliates accused of violating the state’s AV law.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Maintaining Brand Trust in the Face of Negative Press

Over the last year, several of our merchants have found themselves caught up in litigation over compliance with state age verification laws. Recently, Segpay itself was pulled into the spotlight, facing scrutiny over Florida’s AV statute, HB 3. These stories inevitably get picked up by both industry and mainstream news outlets.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How to Switch Payment Processors Without Disrupting Business

For many merchants, the idea of switching payment processors can feel pretty overwhelming. That’s understandable. After all, downtime can stall sales, recurring subscriptions can suddenly fail, or compliance gaps can put accounts at risk. Operating in a high-risk sector like the adult industry can further amplify the stress of transition.

Jonathan Corona ·
Show More