Dispatch From the U.K.: Britain Aims to Take More Control of Web

A 15-year old cartoon shows Uncle Sam holding a box labeled, “Control of Internet Speech.” The “corporate media” asks “how would you like this wrapped?” The two wrapping options are “Anti-terrorism” and “Protect kids.” Porn and terrorism: both tried and trusted ways to frighten the masses into surrendering liberty.

The trouble with good satire is that it’s often too close to the truth.

This industry, above all others, should understand the perils of state censorship. Most of all, an adult industry that agrees with its enemies that pornography is inherently harmful is doing itself, its customers and its long-term survival no favors whatsoever.

The British government has made two apparently unrelated announcements this year.

In April (buried in the middle of an election campaign), a Tory promise was made to block overseas adult sites that do not verify the ages of visitors as required by ATVOD regulations.

In May, it was revealed that the Prime Minister supports a censorship regime for blocking “extremist” content. Both announcements would involve empowering Ofcom (Britain’s powerful communications regulator and state TV censor) to draw up a blacklist of online services.

Both announcements are, effectively, promising the same thing: the creation of a state-backed Internet censor with the power to order ISPs to block specific sites and services. This would be an unprecedented step for a democratic state to take, and would end the era of free access to the Internet in the U.K.

So ATVOD’s age-verification regime is presented as a reasonable and proportionate measure, but is in fact a euphemism for introducing Internet censorship. Britain is almost the only country in Europe that sees a need for such a mechanism.

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court determined long ago that age verification provides an obstacle that prevents adults accessing porn, and so is a form of censorship, and is therefore unconstitutional. This is why age verification in Britain can’t work without also closing our digital borders.

One needs to consider what is meant when the government talks about blocking adult content. Given that (under these proposals) ISPs would be fined for allowing access to sites that are “not suitable for minors,” the line would necessarily be drawn very broadly indeed.

While porn is invariably used as the excuse, the end result would be to block a far wider range of content. We know this because the existing optional ISP porn filters, introduced last year under pressure from David Cameron, actually block content ranging from support for self-harmers to drug information.

About one website in every five is blocked by these filters; understandably, most households have chosen to switch them off to the annoyance of the morality campaigners that campaigned for them.

This new blocking will be mandatory: users won’t have the luxury of switching it off (at least, not without using a VPN or the Tor network).

Ironically, all this comes at a time when the British public’s attitudes towards sex and porn are more liberal than ever.

There’s little evidence that the zeal of the government to protect young minds matches any anti-porn mood among the general public. This moral panic comes on the back of decades of research showing a strong negative correlation between porn accessibility and sexual violence — in other words, easily available porn is linked to a steep decline in rape.

Even Ofcom’s own research, carried out on behalf of the government, accepts there’s more evidence that porn reduces sexual violence than increases it.

Given what is at stake, it’s disappointing that some players in the adult industry have lent their weight to ATVOD’s pro-censorship lobbying efforts.

A handful of businesses, most notably Television X and ICM Registry, have been openly supportive of the U.K. government’s plans for age verification (and the inevitable site blocking required to implement it).

ICM Registry also has been reported to be implementing age verification itself, although it is unclear what this means in practice for a domain registry.

This is a sharp break from ICM Registry’s early, uncompromising anti-censorship stance, when it employed the First Amendment lawyer Robert Corn-Revere. I contacted Corn-Revere to ask about the company’s change in policy, and he told me he has had no involvement with either ICM Registry or IFFOR for the past two years, and added: “To whatever extent ICM and/or IFFOR have endorsed age-verification rules, I am unaware of it and would not agree with it.”

We know that existing mechanisms for child protection are mature, tried and tested.

The adult industry itself has been instrumental in developing tools like the RTA label for this very purpose. These systems allow parents to control what their children access, without any need for the immense incursion into online freedom being proposed by ATVOD and its cheerleaders.

Industry support for state censorship may be disappointing, but isn’t so surprising: the availability of free and user-generated content has driven down sales, and slashed industry profits.

Those people helping ATVOD make its case for censorship do so based (in part at least) on the hope that the proposed law would pull the rug from under the tube sites.

Any business owner offered government help to eliminate his competitors would be sorely tempted to accept. But the creation of a British state-backed Internet censor is far too high a price to pay in exchange for a dreamy return to the good old days where people actually paid for porn.

This industry, above all others, should understand the perils of state censorship. Most of all, an adult industry that agrees with its enemies that pornography is inherently harmful is doing itself, its customers and its long-term survival no favors whatsoever.

Jerry Barnett is the founder and CEO of Sex & Censorship. In addition to his campaigning work, he is a technologist with almost three decades of Internet experience, an entrepreneur, writer and photographer. He is currently writing a book, “Porn Panic,” on porn, moral panics and censorship in the U.K.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles


The Continuous Journey of Legal Compliance in Adult

The adult entertainment industry is teeming with opportunity but is also fraught with challenges, from anticipating consumer behavior to keeping up with technological innovation. The most labyrinthine of all challenges, however, is the world of legal compliance.

Corey D. Silverstein ·

Alexzandra Kekesi Takes Charge as Aylo's Head of Community and Brand

While Alexzandra Kekesi was earning her bachelor’s degree in women’s studies from the Simone de Beauvoir Institute at Concordia University, feminist thinkers influenced her deeply, inspiring her passion for sex work advocacy.

Alejandro Freixes ·

New Year, New Tools for Tackling Chargebacks

Happy New Year! Looking back, 2023 saw some important developments for the industry. Visa lowered the limit on credit card surcharges to 3%, AI continued growing fast and Mastercard published an update to its Business Risk Assessment and Mitigation (BRAM) program.

Jonathan Corona ·

The Next Frontier in Computing, Storage Is Here

While I typically steer clear of diving too deeply into the technical nitty-gritty, in this month’s column I’m making an exception, because there’s a technological evolution underway that has the potential to fundamentally enhance technical outcomes and, more importantly, grow revenue.

Brad Mitchell ·

Raising Awareness and Taking Action Against Financial Discrimination

While foes of the adult entertainment industry often focus on “moral” concerns and perpetuate social stigmas, another form of attack can be equally or even more damaging: financial discrimination.

Corey D. Silverstein ·

Beyond DMCA Takedowns: Exploring Alternative Avenues

Most content creators recognize that inevitably, their content will be leaked on pirate sites, forums and file lockers. The most responsible and successful creators have therefore implemented a strategy to protect their valuable intellectual property.

Lawrence Walters ·

The Mainstreaming of Pleasure Products: Boom or Doom?

Not all that long ago, the idea that you might pick up a sex toy at the same drugstore or big box store where you do the rest of your shopping seemed unlikely at best. But today, with attitudes toward sexual wellness shifting, our category has hit the mainstream.

Sean Quinn ·

The ABCs of KYB and KYC

As a payment processor, we devote a lot of time and energy to applying two crucial principles: Know Your Business (KYB) and Know Your Customer (KYC). If you’ve engaged in this process, you know how difficult it can be, but we go through it to be sure we are onboarding a good merchant.

Cathy Beardsley ·

WIA Profile: Danae Mucino

For a long time, Danae Mucino wasn’t sure about what she wanted to do. With one bachelor’s degree in management and human relations, plus another in marketing and event planning, she found herself working in a variety of fields, including travel, immigration and fashion.

Women In Adult ·

Navigating the Ever-Evolving Needs of Your Customers

Since it’s your customers who keep you in business, understanding as much as you can about them should be at the core of your strategy. That’s true whether you’re marketing to attract new customers or making logistical improvements to ensure your current customers are satisfied.

Juicy Jay ·
Show More