opinion

Registering Your Intellectual Property

Savvy intellectual property owners understand that effective protection and enforcement of their intellectual property requires that they register their copyrights and trademarks. Unfortunately, many of the same owners are not aware that recordation of their copyright and trademark registrations with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) can provide them with a powerful and often overlooked means of substantially increasing the effectiveness of their efforts to protect and enforce their intellectual property rights.

Under U.S. law, CBP is empowered to monitor shipments of goods into the U.S. and exclude, detain and/or seize suspected counterfeit merchandise and other materials that it suspects infringe a registered copyright or trademark. To assist CBP’s ability to stop counterfeits and infringements from entering the country, it maintains a database for copyrighted works registered with the U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) and trademarks registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

IP owners that record their copyright and trademark registrations with the CBP also benefit from the wealth of useful rights enforcement information that the CBP provides in association with its interdiction work.

Unfortunately, neither the registration of a copyright with the Copyright Office nor the registration of a trademark with the USPTO will automatically result in recordation with CBP. In order to obtain CBP’s assistance to prevent the importation of infringing or counterfeit goods, owners of registered copyrights and trademarks must proactively record the subject copyright or trademark registration with CBP. This is done by the owner or the owner’s attorney through an online application through CBP’s Intellectual Property Rights e-Recordation (IPRR) system.

There are many benefits to recording copyright and trademark registrations with CBP. First, of course, is that CBP is able to monitor shipments and seize or otherwise stop imported merchandise suspected of infringing the registered copyright or trademark. But as you might imagine, the determination of whether a product constitutes a copyright or trademark infringement often can be challenging for the CBP. Fortunately, recordation with CBP commences a cooperative relationship between the CBP and the IP owner that is often used to better enable CBP officers to make infringement determinations. Once the recordation of the copyright or trademark registration with the CBP has been made, the IP owner has the opportunity to provide product guides and product identification training to CBP to enhance its ability to make infringement determinations at the point of entry.

IP owners that record their copyright and trademark registrations with the CBP also benefit from the wealth of useful rights enforcement information that the CBP provides in association with its interdiction work. For example, once suspected counterfeit or infringing goods are seized, CBP provides the trademark or copyright owner with data regarding the merchandise seized, including the country of origin, the name and address of the importer and manufacturer (if known), a description of the goods, and the quantity seized.

The process of recording copyright and trademark registrations with CBP is fairly simple and relatively inexpensive. First, the copyright and/or trademark associated with the product must be registered before commencing the process of recordation with the CBP. Copyright registrations may be applied for online at Copyright.gov. Many companies and individuals can undertake the registration process on their own without costly assistance from an attorney because the application process is relatively simple and the USCO’s website is very easy to use. The USCO also provides live assistance at numbers posted on the website.

Companies and individuals can also apply for federal registration of their trademarks online at USPTO.gov. It is important to note that the right to record a trademark registration with CBP only applies to marks registered on the Principal Register. Marks registered on the Supplemental Register cannot be recorded with CBP.

It should also be noted that federal registration of a trademark on the Principle Register is a much more complicated matter than the registration of a copyright. A discussion of the reasons why this is the case, unfortunately, exceeds the scope of this article. But in sum, because of the complexities and potential problems that can, and often do, arise in the prosecution of a federal trademark application, in my opinion, federal trademark applications should only be prepared by qualified and experienced trademark attorneys or by a non-attorney under the direct supervision of an experienced trademark attorney.

Once federal registration of the copyright and/or trademark is obtained the owner can file an application for recordation with CBP’s Intellectual Property Rights e-Recordation system any time thereafter. Recordation of copyright and trademark registrations with CBP become effective on the date the subject application is approved by the CBP. The current recordation fee is $190 for each copyright registration. For trademarks, the cost is $190 for each International Class of goods in which the trademark is registered.

The recordation of registered copyrights with CBP remains in effect in the IPRR system for 20 years unless the copyright expires before that time. Recordations of registered trademarks remain in effect concurrent with the USPTO registration and must be renewed with CBP when the USPTO registration of the mark is renewed.

Not surprisingly, the CBP requires the payment of renewal fees to maintain the recordations of copyright and trademark registrations in its database. The current renewal fee for copyrights is $80 per copyright registration. The current renewal fee for trademarks is $80 for each International Class of goods in which the mark is registered.

Conclusion

For owners of federally registered trademarks and copyrights concerned about the importation of counterfeit or infringing products, enlisting the assistance of CBP to prevent the entry of those products into the U.S. makes good sense. From personal experience I can report that the use of CBP services can dramatically enhance an IP owner’s ability to protect and enforce intellectual property rights.

If you have questions or need advice about recording your trademarks and copyrights with CBP, please feel free to contact me.

This article is for educational purposes only and nothing in this article is intended to be, or should be considered to be, legal advice.

Gregory A. Piccionelli is an entertainment attorney with over 20 years experience specializing in Internet matters. He can be reached at Piccionelli & Sarno at (818) 201-3955 or greg@piccionellisarno.com.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

trends

WIA Profile: Taylor Moore

With a 70-person team and a growing slate of tools for content creators, the Teasy Agency has developed a reputation for putting talent first. That commitment owes a lot to co-founder Taylor Moore’s own experiences as a cam model.

Jackie Backman ·
profile

WIA Profile: Cathy Turns Creator Platform Experience Into a Model-First Playbook

As both a model and industry executive, Cathy lives in two worlds at once. “Since I do both things, I can act as the liaison between the model community and the rest of the SextPanther team,” she tells XBIZ.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

From Compliance to Confidence: The Future of Safety in Adult Platforms

In numerous countries and U.S. states, laws now require platforms to prevent minors from accessing age-inappropriate material. But the need for safeguarding doesn’t end with age verification. Today’s online landscape also places adult companies at uniquely high risk for inadvertently facilitating exploitation, abuse or reputational harm, or of being accused of doing so.

Andy Lulham ·
opinion

What Adult Businesses Need to Know About Florida's Age Verification Law

The rise and proliferation of age verification laws has changed the landscape for the online adult industry. A recent and compelling example is the state of Florida, where Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed multiple complaints against major platforms as well as affiliates accused of violating the state’s AV law.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Maintaining Brand Trust in the Face of Negative Press

Over the last year, several of our merchants have found themselves caught up in litigation over compliance with state age verification laws. Recently, Segpay itself was pulled into the spotlight, facing scrutiny over Florida’s AV statute, HB 3. These stories inevitably get picked up by both industry and mainstream news outlets.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How to Switch Payment Processors Without Disrupting Business

For many merchants, the idea of switching payment processors can feel pretty overwhelming. That’s understandable. After all, downtime can stall sales, recurring subscriptions can suddenly fail, or compliance gaps can put accounts at risk. Operating in a high-risk sector like the adult industry can further amplify the stress of transition.

Jonathan Corona ·
profile

WIA Profile: Katie

Katie is the ultimate girl’s girl. As community manager at Chaturbate, she answers DMs, remembers names, and shows up for creators and fellow businesswomen when it counts. She’s quick to credit the people around her, and careful to make space for others in every room she enters.

Women in Adult ·
opinion

How to Stay Legally Protected When Policies Get Outdated

The adult industry has long operated in a complex legal environment subject to rapid change. Now, a confluence of age verification laws, lawsuits, credit card processing and data privacy rules has created an urgent need for all industry participants — from major platforms to independent creators — to review and potentially overhaul their legal and operational policies.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

From Compliance Chaos to Crypto Clarity: Making the Case for Digital Payments in Adult

These are uncertain times for adult merchants. With compliance tightening and age verification mandates rising, the barrier to entry keeps getting higher.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

Real-Time Insights to Streamline E-Payments and Stop Lost Sales

A slow checkout process is more than just annoying — it’s expensive. In a high-risk sector like the adult industry, even small delays or declined transactions can cost businesses thousands in lost revenue every month.

Jonathan Corona ·
Show More