U.S. Court Reverses Decision on Intercepted Emails

BOSTON — A federal appeals court has ruled that even though emails are stored in computer memory during transmission, it is still criminal for an email provider — or anyone else — to secretly intercept them.

The decision by the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was a defeat for an executive who configured email processing software so that all incoming email sent from a competitor was secretly copied and sent to his personal email account before it arrived in the intended recipient's mailbox.

Unless appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, the reversal of a previous ruling by a three-judge 1st Circuit panel shuts the door to further interpretations of the federal Wiretap Act that otherwise would have eroded personal privacy rights.

Last year, the panel upheld a federal judge's earlier dismissal last year of a wiretapping charge against former Interloc Vice President Branford C. Councilman.

The government said that Interloc, a now-defunct online seller of rare books, tried to exploit Amazon.com emails “to develop a list of books, learn about competitors and attain a commercial advantage.”

Councilman had directed employees to write computer code to intercept and copy all incoming emails from Amazon.com to Interloc's subscribers — all prior to the eventual delivery of email messages to their intended recipients, the book dealers who had an email account with Interloc.

The government charged Councilman with conspiracy to violate the Wiretap Act; namely, to intercept an electronic communication and disclose its contents.

But Councilman argued that no violation of the Wiretap Act had occurred because the emails were copied while in “electronic storage.”

He claimed the messages were in the process of being routed through a network of servers to recipients.

Because such messages were in “electronic storage,” they were not intercepted for purposes of the Wiretap Act, an appeals panel previously held.

The court said that messages in storage, however “temporary” or “intermediate” such storage might be, are not protected as electronic communications under the Wiretap Act.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation immediately denounced the ruling, saying in a statement that the court “dealt a grave blow to the privacy of Internet communications.”

By interpreting the Wiretap Act's privacy protections narrowly, the EFF said the court effectively gave Internet communications providers free rein to invade the privacy of their users for any reason and at any time.

After several groups, including the EFF, filed briefs supporting the government's petition for a new hearing, the appeals court granted a rehearing of the case before all the judges in the circuit.

With last week’s decision, the 1st Circuit ruled that Councilman could be prosecuted under the Wiretap Act.

“The Wiretap Act is not unconstitutionally vague in its application here,” the court, overturning its decision, wrote. “From its text, a person of average intelligence would, at the very least, be on notice that ‘except as otherwise specifically provided in’ the Act, ‘electronic communications,’ which are defined expansively, may not be ‘intercepted.’”

The case is United States vs. Councilman, No. 03-1383.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

European Commission Approves AV Guidelines, Unveils Prototype App

The European Commission on Monday released its final, approved guidelines for protecting minors online under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and made public a “white label” age verification app intended to help sites and platforms comply with age verification rules under the DSA.

New Membership Site 'Sluts Corner' Launches

R18 Entertainment has launched a new membership site, SlutsCorner.com.

Roxie Rae Relaunches Site Through XSiteAbility

Roxie Rae has relaunched her site through XSiteAbility.

Federal Appeals Court Vacates FTC 'Click to Cancel' Rule Pending Review

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit on Tuesday vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions, pending further review.

NYC Adult Stores Lose Challenge to Zoning Law, May Face Relocation

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit on Tuesday upheld a lower court’s decision to allow enforcement of a 2001 zoning law aimed at forcing adult retail stores out of most parts of New York City.

FSC Drops Florida AV Lawsuit in Wake of SCOTUS Decision

A U.S. district court judge granted on Tuesday a motion by Free Speech Coalition to dismiss the trade association’s lawsuit over Florida’s age verification law, a case that had been on hold pending the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the constitutionality of state AV laws.

Ukrainian President Responds to Porn Legalization Petition

President Volodymyr Zelensky responded Tuesday to an OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine, stating that he would wait for the legislative process to play out “in accordance with established procedure.”

Only Tax Deductions Joins Pineapple Support as Sponsor

Adult industry accounting firm Only Tax Deductions has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Adult Empire Launches 'Conversations' Podcast Series

Adult Empire has launched a new official podcast series hosted by Nicole Chappelle and Charlie.

Sex Work CEO Launches 'Teams Plan' for AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Teams Plan for its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

Show More