Home > News > Jury Goes to Deliberate in Max Hardcore Case • Bookmark   • Newsletters   • Register Search Options


Jury Goes to Deliberate in Max Hardcore Case

A week after the trial began, jurors have gone into deliberations
Jury Goes to Deliberate in Max Hardcore Case
Get XBIZ News
Jun 4, 2008 3:00 PM PDT    Text size: 
TAMPA, Fla. — Today, just after 1 p.m. EST, the jury in the Max Hardcore case went to deliberation. The action follows a weeklong trial where jurors have been asked to determine if the content of five DVDs produced and directed by Paul Little, aka Max Hardcore, are obscene by local community standards in the city of Tampa.

Yesterday, as expected, U.S. District Court Judge Susan C. Bucklew denied a motion by the defense for Hardcore and his company MaxWorld Enterprises to be acquitted on all charges.

Hardcore and his company have been charged with five counts of using a computer to sell obscene matter and an additional five counts of delivering obscene material through the U.S. mail. Hardcore faces a maximum of 25 years for each count involving the computer and 45 years for conviction on the remaining counts.

In closing arguments, MaxWorld attorney Lou Sirkin asked the jury to consider more than 60 adult business located in the Tampa area, which may infer accepting community standards toward adult-oriented material.

Sirkin also pointed out to jurors that if all speech was “pretty and what was acceptable” to the public, then there would be no need for the protections afforded by the 1st Amendment. He reminded jurors that they could chose to watch or not watch whatever content they like in private, as long as it was consensual.

Justice Department lawyer Edward McAndrew told the jury that they had probably never viewed anything similar to Hardcore’s videos in their lives. McAndrew called Hardcore’s content an “assault” on the jurors’ senses. He also pointed out that availability of adult material in the community did not necessarily reflect the community’s acceptance of such material.

During the trial, members of the jury were required to watch nearly 8½ hours of Hardcore’s videos in open court, though some were not viewed in their entirety, as was pointed out by the defense.

Because the Miller test, used by the federal government as a standard for determining obscenity, requires that works be considered as a whole, the defense argued that the jury must view each video in question, in order to arrive at their final determination.

The defense has also argued that Hardcore is not guilty of the charges because he was unaware that his website’s servers were located in Tampa, and had no intention of disseminating content in that area.

Because the videos were purchased by a Tampa-based postal inspector from California-based distributor Jaded Video's website, the defense also stated that Hardcore was not guilty of using the U.S. Mail to transport the DVDs to Tampa, since Hardcore shipped the movies to his distributor in California via private shipping company UPS.

The owner of Jaded Video was granted immunity by the court for his testimony at the trial.

The jury could return with their decision as soon as tomorrow. A guilty or not guilty verdict could have far-reaching implications for other obscenity prosecutions where adult producers have been charged, including the ongoing Extreme Associates case, and the recent indictment on obscenity charges against adult producer/director John Stagliano and Evil Angel.

More ways to get XBIZ News:  RSS Feeds  |  E-Newsletters  |  Desktop Widget  |  Mobile
Looking for porn star news and behind-the-scene videos? Check out XFANZ.com !


Dissecting an $11.9M Affiliate Marketing Judgment

The Federal Trade Commission scored another major win in early October when the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling, requiring LeadClick Media LLC to pay an $11.9 million award. The... More »

Legal Protection for Amateur Shoots

Any adult industry professional who creates video content with actual first-time amateurs will come to an early knowledge that later performer regret is commonplace. Recognized performers who regularly... More »

Legal Options to Address Pirated Cam Performances

Many webcam performers have experienced a new trend in online piracy — the illegal recording and publication of live webcam performances. The “business model” is disturbingly simple:... More »
Stay informed of the latest industry developments. Get XBIZ newsletters delivered to your inbox. Subscribe today!
Enter email address:

* To manage existing subscriptions click here.

Submit your press release to
multiple news outlets with 1 click.
Subscribe to RSS news feeds or
add free content to your website.
Access XBIZ news and articles
with your mobile device.
Access the latest issues of the industry's leading trade publications in digital form. View online or download for offline viewing.


XBIZ 2017

Jan 09 - Jan 13
Hollywood, CA

XBIZ Awards 2017

Jan 12 - Jan 12
Los Angeles, CA

ANME Founders Show

Jan 14 - Jan 15
Los Angeles Marriott Burbank Airport

Everything To Do With Sex Show

Jan 20 - Jan 22
Montréal, Québec
Everyday thousands of business professionals browse XBIZ's industry directory for quality products and services. Not listed yet? Your company could be losing potential new business. Submit your company today!
Use XBIZ RSS feeds to stay informed of the latest industry developments or as a content syndication tool for your website!