Texas Strip Club Tax, Declared Unconstitutional, Still Being Collected During Appeal

AUSTIN, Texas — State District Judge Stephen Yelenosky has told attorneys for Texas strip clubs that the state can continue to collect a controversial strip club fee — which was struck down as unconstitutional three weeks ago — while the state appeals the ruling.

Texas Entertainment Association attorney Stewart Whitehead said the state is insisting on collecting fees that it knows are unconstitutional. The Texas Entertainment Association membership includes more than half the topless clubs in Texas.

"It's a grave injustice that the attorney general and the comptroller would use procedural court technicalities to continue to trample on the rights of these business owners," Whitehead said.

The $5 cover fee on strip club patrons was approved by the Texas legislature last year, which earmarked the expected $40 million in annual revenues for sexual assault services and health insurance to the poor.

Club owners sued, and on March 28, state district Judge Scott Jenkins found that the fee was an illegal tax on "expression that, while politically unpopular, is nevertheless protected by the First Amendment." Declaring the law invalid, Judge Jenkins issued an order that included an injunction against collecting the fee.

On April 7, the attorney general's office filed an appeal, which automatically suspended Judge Jenkins' judgment and the injunction. The state comptroller sent out a letter to strip clubs saying that the fee is active, and that the first reports and payments are due Monday. If they aren't sent in, a 5 percent penalty takes effect.

On Thursday, Judge Yelenosky declined to issue an order that would keep the injunction in place during the appeal, effectively continuing collection of the tax.

Texas Entertainment Association attorney Whitehead said that the businesses will continue to fight, and will appeal Thursday's ruling.

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Missouri Lawmaker Attempts to Revive 'Health Warnings' for Adult Sites

A Missouri state representative has introduced a bill that would require adult sites to post notices warning users of alleged physical, mental, and social harms associated with pornography, despite a previous federal court ruling against such requirements.

Sportsheets Releases New Training Video for 'Indica' Collection

Sportsheets has released its latest training video, titled "The Indica Collection by Sex & Mischief," hosted by Brand Ambassador Rin Musick.

Orion Debuts 3 New Styles From Cottelli Lingerie

Orion Wholesale has introduced three new styles from its Cottelli Lingerie line.

Casey Murphy Launches 'Pleasure Brand Lab' Digital Marketing Suite

Sexual wellness marketing strategist Casey Murphy has launched Pleasure Brand Lab, a digital marketing suite for small and indie brands.

CAM4, Lovense Introduce New 'Interactive Control' Features

CAM4 has debuted a new suite of interactive Lovense control features for models.

Blush Debuts 3 New Vibes From 'Sexy Things' Collection

Blush has introduced three new vibrators from its Sexy Things collection.

Holiday Products, Sugar Splash Sign Distro Deal

Holiday Products has signed a distribution deal with wellness brand Sugar Splash.

Ruling: Italy's 'Porn Tax' Applies to All Content Creators

Italy’s tax revenue agency has ruled that the nation’s 25% “ethical tax” on income generated from adult content applies even to smaller independent online content creators.

Le Wand Introduces 'Classique' Vibe Collection

Le Wand has debuted its new Classique vibrator line.

Proposed New Hampshire AV Bill Appears to Violate Constitution

A bill in the New Hampshire state legislature, aimed at requiring adult sites to age-verify users in that state, contains a provision that seemingly contradicts the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution.

Show More