U.S. Justices Won’t Hear Domain Name Battle

WASHINGTON — In a case of particular interest to webmasters, U.S. justices this week turned away a case filed by automaker Nissan Motor Co. over the domain names Nissan.com and Nissan.net.

The Japanese car giant had sued U.S. entrepreneur Uzi Nissan, who registered Nissan.com in 1994 for his computer hardware company, Nissan Computer. He also registered Nissan.net in 1996 for an Internet service provider he founded.

Nissan Motors sued him in 1999 for $10 million, claiming that the word Nissan is its registered trademark and that the company therefore has the exclusive right to use the name Nissan. The car giant also asked the court to transfer the domain names.

Uzi Nissan, an Israeli immigrant, rejected the car company’s allegations in the suit, arguing that Nissan is his family name and also the name of a month in Hebrew and Arabic.

Uzi Nissan also noted that Nissan Motors already owns and can use the domain name NissanMotors.com.

The case, decided without comment by U.S. justices, made its way to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which decided that Nissan Motors’ claim was without merit.

The case first was considered in Los Angeles Superior Court, where a judge ruled that actions by Uzi Nissan didn’t act in bad faith — a factor weighed in federal anti-cybersquatting laws.

In November 2002, a Superior Court judge issued a permanent injunction, allowing Uzi Nissan to keep his domain names, but restricting the commercial advertising and anti-Nissan content that could be placed on the websites.

Uzi Nissan promptly appealed.

The 9th Circuit later ruled that Nissan Motors could not gain protection against any dilution of its trademark because Nissan Computer had made its first commercial use of the mark more than five years before Nissan’s trademark became famous in the United States. The court also said that Uzi Nissan can continue to link anti-Nissan websites.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court dashed all possible hopes by Nissan Motors to appeal the domain-name case.

The case is Nissan Motor Co. vs. Nissan Computer Corp., No. 04-869.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Show More