Adult Industry Attorneys Submit 2257 Comments

WASHINGTON — As the public comment period for the proposed revisions to 2257 record-keeping regulations drew to a close Monday, the last-minute submissions included detailed commentary from adult industry attorneys J.D. Obenberger and Lawrence Walters.

In their comments, Obenberger and Walters drew attention to ambiguities in the statute, the burden that complying with the regulations would impose on producers, concerns over the definitions of key terms in the statute and other problematic aspects of the record-keeping regulations.

Obenberger took aim at several “fundamental ambiguities” in the statute, arguing that these uncertainties must be resolved before the proposed revisions to the regulations are finalized.

With respect to how disclosure statements are to be displayed on or affixed to websites, Obenberger noted that the current “practice of the industry has been to attach a link — or more commonly a link to a notice — on the index page, that is the title page of websites containing covered depictions — whether or not that page actually contains covered depictions.”

Obenberger argued that the index or home page of a website is “where law enforcement agents and the general public have always looked to find contact information concerning the operators of a website, and it seems to me unimaginable that, assuming the validity of Section 2257, a disclosure statement on the home page, through a loophole of ambiguity and because that page itself contains to covered depiction, should not be required on the home page.”

Equally unclear, Obengerger observed, is the question of what is the “matter” to which a disclosure statement relates.

“What is a website’s status under Section 2257 (a)?” Obenberger asked in his commentary. “If a web site is a regulable matter, do each of its elements under your view remain individually regulable matters?”

At times, Obenberger’s commentary adopts a chastising tone, nearly taunting the Justice Department for its apparent lack of understanding concerning both the technologies related to the Internet, and the realities of online adult content distribution.

“Have you any idea that these galleries are composed of sets of images that are purchased in bulk and uploaded to servers via automation which then recomposes the pages and the indexes to a site?,” Obenberger wrote. “What purpose exists in requiring such a statement with regard to each image? These sets often contain twenty to 150 images. What purpose is served by multiplying the obligation from a statement concerning one photographic event into 150 notices?”

In his comments, Walters began by focusing on the difficulties that would be faced by secondary producers if the proposed regulations were to be adopted as-is.

“Imposing the requirements of full 2257 document maintenance and inspection on so-called ‘secondary producers’ having no involvement in the actual hiring, contracting for, managing, or otherwise arranging for the participation of the depicted performers, imposes an undue and excessive burden on those secondary producers,” Walters wrote.

Making matters worse for secondary producers, Walters asserted, is the fact that there remains substantial question as to what the effective date of the regulations is, and what content will be subject to the proposed regulations.

“The [Justice] Department contends that while it could require compliance for images produced after July 3, 1995; the effective date of 2257; it chooses not to do so to avoid any ‘conceivable ex post facto concern,’” Walters wrote. “However, significant ex post facto concerns remain with respect to requiring compliance for all images produced after July 27, 2006.”

Walters noted that until recently, many secondary producers had “relied on the protections of the preliminary injunction issued in Free Speech Coalition vs. Gonzalez…. which prevented records inspections and enforcement actions against secondary producers/[FSC] members.”

“As a result of these unique circumstances, many secondary producers have been unable to acquire age verification documents mandated by 2257, in connection with images displayed on secondary producers’ websites,” Walters wrote.

“Primary producers of such material have been hesitant to circulate personal information relating to performers depicted in such content, citing privacy concerns and the potential for stalking and/or identity theft resulting from widespread circulation of this information to all secondary producer/webmasters displaying the images on the Internet ... if the regulations are adopted with an effective date for compliance by secondary producers of July 27, a host of depictions, otherwise protected by the 1st Amendment to the [U.S.] Constitution, will be suddenly criminalized, and their continued display subject to federal felony prosecution.”

Walters also cited cost of compliance concerns, asserting that “astronomical costs will be borne by industry producers in the attempt to ensure compliance with the new regulations.”

“These costs take the form of additional staffing, software development, updating and maintenance, and institution of new compliance procedures,” Walters said. “These costs will be excessive for large businesses, and insurmountable for smaller operations.”

Ultimately, Walters said, the aggregate cost of compliance for the industry will exceed $100 million dollars, in contrast to Justice Department claims.

Noting that the Justice Department itself estimated that there are currently 500,000 websites containing visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct, Walters said that based on his own “considerable exposure to the industry” the actual numbers are far larger. Walters further argued that even if one accepts the Justice Department estimates, the total cost of compliance would exceed $100 million.

“A poll of this firm’s web-based clients requesting a cost estimate to comply with the new disclosure requirements indicates an average cost of annual compliance at $210,092 per business,” Walters wrote. “This, multiplied by the minimum 5,000 affected businesses, well exceeds the $100 million threshold requirement. Accordingly, this rule should be reviewed and promulgated in accordance with the requirements pertaining to rules which will have a greater than $100 million annual impact on the economy.”

For the complete text of Walter's comments, click here, and for the full text of Obenberger's comments, click the "View attached document" link below.

View Document

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

A Day With Mike Quasar: Porn, Pets and Wit That Won't Quit

Mike Quasar has been working in the adult industry for 34 years. The highly respected veteran director admits to feeling a little astonished by this fact.

Kelly Holland's Industry Animal Rescue Charity Event 'Vice Is Nice' Returns Saturday

The 13th annual Vice Is Nice event, a long-standing adult industry fundraiser for Animal Rescue Alliance (TARA), will take place Saturday in Chatsworth.

France Reinstates Age Verification Rule for EU Sites

France’s highest court, the Council of State, on Tuesday reinstated age verification rules for EU-based sites under the country’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, ruling in favor of the French government and against Hammy Media.

Whisper Fans Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

Whisper Fans has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Angela White Stars in Latest From Brazzers

Angela White stars with Scott Nails in the latest release from Brazzers, titled "Brazzers Beach."

Utherverse Launches 'Red Light Center' Virtual World

Virtual reality and metaverse technology company Utherverse has launched its new virtual world, RedLightCenter.io.

European Commission Approves AV Guidelines, Unveils Prototype App

The European Commission on Monday released its final, approved guidelines for protecting minors online under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and made public a “white label” age verification app intended to help sites and platforms comply with age verification rules under the DSA.

Eva Angelina on Stepping Back Into the Spotlight With Purpose

Eva Angelina is back in front of the camera, stronger and sharper than ever. Making her triumphant return in her own inimitable badass style, the veteran performer recently reentered the industry not just with a bang, but a dazzling signal flare.

Cassie Del Isla, Ama Rio Topline Latest 'Secret Lesbian Diaries'

Cassie Del Isla and Ama Rio headline the 15th volume of "Secret Lesbian Diaries" from Girlfriends Films.

Show More