Home > News > Adult Industry Attorneys Submit 2257 Comments • Bookmark   • Newsletters   • Register Search Options


Adult Industry Attorneys Submit 2257 Comments

In comments submitted to the Justice Department, two prominent adult industry attorneys focus on financial burdens of compliance and ambiguities of the statute.
Adult Industry Attorneys Submit 2257 Comments
Get XBIZ News
Sep 12, 2007 7:00 AM PDT    Text size: 
WASHINGTON — As the public comment period for the proposed revisions to 2257 record-keeping regulations drew to a close Monday, the last-minute submissions included detailed commentary from adult industry attorneys J.D. Obenberger and Lawrence Walters.

In their comments, Obenberger and Walters drew attention to ambiguities in the statute, the burden that complying with the regulations would impose on producers, concerns over the definitions of key terms in the statute and other problematic aspects of the record-keeping regulations.

Obenberger took aim at several “fundamental ambiguities” in the statute, arguing that these uncertainties must be resolved before the proposed revisions to the regulations are finalized.

With respect to how disclosure statements are to be displayed on or affixed to websites, Obenberger noted that the current “practice of the industry has been to attach a link — or more commonly a link to a notice — on the index page, that is the title page of websites containing covered depictions — whether or not that page actually contains covered depictions.”

Obenberger argued that the index or home page of a website is “where law enforcement agents and the general public have always looked to find contact information concerning the operators of a website, and it seems to me unimaginable that, assuming the validity of Section 2257, a disclosure statement on the home page, through a loophole of ambiguity and because that page itself contains to covered depiction, should not be required on the home page.”

Equally unclear, Obengerger observed, is the question of what is the “matter” to which a disclosure statement relates.

“What is a website’s status under Section 2257 (a)?” Obenberger asked in his commentary. “If a web site is a regulable matter, do each of its elements under your view remain individually regulable matters?”

At times, Obenberger’s commentary adopts a chastising tone, nearly taunting the Justice Department for its apparent lack of understanding concerning both the technologies related to the Internet, and the realities of online adult content distribution.

“Have you any idea that these galleries are composed of sets of images that are purchased in bulk and uploaded to servers via automation which then recomposes the pages and the indexes to a site?,” Obenberger wrote. “What purpose exists in requiring such a statement with regard to each image? These sets often contain twenty to 150 images. What purpose is served by multiplying the obligation from a statement concerning one photographic event into 150 notices?”

In his comments, Walters began by focusing on the difficulties that would be faced by secondary producers if the proposed regulations were to be adopted as-is.

“Imposing the requirements of full 2257 document maintenance and inspection on so-called ‘secondary producers’ having no involvement in the actual hiring, contracting for, managing, or otherwise arranging for the participation of the depicted performers, imposes an undue and excessive burden on those secondary producers,” Walters wrote.

Making matters worse for secondary producers, Walters asserted, is the fact that there remains substantial question as to what the effective date of the regulations is, and what content will be subject to the proposed regulations.

“The [Justice] Department contends that while it could require compliance for images produced after July 3, 1995; the effective date of 2257; it chooses not to do so to avoid any ‘conceivable ex post facto concern,’” Walters wrote. “However, significant ex post facto concerns remain with respect to requiring compliance for all images produced after July 27, 2006.”

Walters noted that until recently, many secondary producers had “relied on the protections of the preliminary injunction issued in Free Speech Coalition vs. Gonzalez…. which prevented records inspections and enforcement actions against secondary producers/[FSC] members.”

“As a result of these unique circumstances, many secondary producers have been unable to acquire age verification documents mandated by 2257, in connection with images displayed on secondary producers’ websites,” Walters wrote.

“Primary producers of such material have been hesitant to circulate personal information relating to performers depicted in such content, citing privacy concerns and the potential for stalking and/or identity theft resulting from widespread circulation of this information to all secondary producer/webmasters displaying the images on the Internet ... if the regulations are adopted with an effective date for compliance by secondary producers of July 27, a host of depictions, otherwise protected by the 1st Amendment to the [U.S.] Constitution, will be suddenly criminalized, and their continued display subject to federal felony prosecution.”

Walters also cited cost of compliance concerns, asserting that “astronomical costs will be borne by industry producers in the attempt to ensure compliance with the new regulations.”

“These costs take the form of additional staffing, software development, updating and maintenance, and institution of new compliance procedures,” Walters said. “These costs will be excessive for large businesses, and insurmountable for smaller operations.”

Ultimately, Walters said, the aggregate cost of compliance for the industry will exceed $100 million dollars, in contrast to Justice Department claims.

Noting that the Justice Department itself estimated that there are currently 500,000 websites containing visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct, Walters said that based on his own “considerable exposure to the industry” the actual numbers are far larger. Walters further argued that even if one accepts the Justice Department estimates, the total cost of compliance would exceed $100 million.

“A poll of this firm’s web-based clients requesting a cost estimate to comply with the new disclosure requirements indicates an average cost of annual compliance at $210,092 per business,” Walters wrote. “This, multiplied by the minimum 5,000 affected businesses, well exceeds the $100 million threshold requirement. Accordingly, this rule should be reviewed and promulgated in accordance with the requirements pertaining to rules which will have a greater than $100 million annual impact on the economy.”

For the complete text of Walter's comments, click here, and for the full text of Obenberger's comments, click the "View attached document" link below.

More ways to get XBIZ News:  RSS Feeds  |  E-Newsletters  |  Desktop Widget  |  Mobile
Looking for porn star news and behind-the-scene videos? Check out XFANZ.com !


Uncovering the Newest Trends in Alternative Billing

For adult merchants, especially adult website operators, the notion of “alternative billing” hasn’t really evolved from its Ameri-centric “anything but MasterCard or Visa”... More »

Sexual Enhancement Market Sees Growth From Couples-Friendly Approach

From cock rings and penis pumps to creams, gels and sprays, male sexual enhancement products have long been a fixture in the pleasure products/sex toys sector. But the marketing of those products has evolved... More »

Lubes, Lotions and Potions: Manufacturers Talk Gateway Products

Sensual body care products have strong consumer interest and plenty of appeal for customers of all types. With lubes, massage oils, creams, lotions, and sprays all bringing in significant sales, manufacturers... More »
Stay informed of the latest industry developments. Get XBIZ newsletters delivered to your inbox. Subscribe today!
Enter email address:

* To manage existing subscriptions click here.

Submit your press release to
multiple news outlets with 1 click.
Subscribe to RSS news feeds or
add free content to your website.
Access XBIZ news and articles
with your mobile device.
Access the latest issues of the industry's leading trade publications in digital form. View online or download for offline viewing.


XBIZ.net Paysite Meetup

May 04 - May 04
Prague, Czech Republic

Eurowebtainment 2017

May 17 - May 20
Majorca, Spain

XBIZ Retreat

May 30 - Jun 03
Miami, Florida

XBIZ Miami 2017

May 30 - Jun 02
Miami, Florida
Everyday thousands of business professionals browse XBIZ's industry directory for quality products and services. Not listed yet? Your company could be losing potential new business. Submit your company today!
Use XBIZ RSS feeds to stay informed of the latest industry developments or as a content syndication tool for your website!