EFF Challenges ‘Bogus’ Patent on Internet Subdomains

SAN FRANCISCO — The Electronic Frontier Foundation has filed a challenge to what they called a “bogus patent on Internet subdomains” that has been used by the patent holder to intimidate small businesses and technology innovators.

The patent originally was filed by a company called Ideaflood, which billed itself as an “intellectual property holding company” — the same manner of business as Acacia Media Technologies, the patent holding company that has attempted to enforce a broad patent on sending and receiving audio and video content against a variety of adult entertainment and mainstream companies.

According to EFF, Ideaflood used its subdomain patent to threaten a number of hosting companies, including FreeHomePage.com, and T35 Webhosting, as well as the social networking site LiveJournal.com.

The subdomain patent describes a system for allowing users of a network to create and retrieve information from a personally named subdomain, like News.Google.com. Since being granted to Ideaflood, the patent has been transferred to a company called Hoshiko LLC.

In its request for re-examination of the patent, EFF submitted a series of exhibits that “show that the method Ideaflood claims to have invented was well known before the patent was issued,” according to EFF.

“In fact, website developers were having public discussions about how to create these virtual subdomains on an Apache developer mailing list for more than a year before Ideaflood made its patent claim,” EFF said in a press release.

Jason Schultz, a senior staff attorney for EFF, told XBIZ that invalid patents like the Ideaflood/Hoshiko subdomain patent “create a stifling of innovation, because they give the company with the patent a monopoly.”

“It allows for patent holders to essentially bully companies and organizations into settling and paying money when they shouldn’t have to,” Schultz said. “They tend to target small companies that can’t afford patent attorneys, and say something like ‘You can pay us $100,000 now, or you can pay us millions when we prevail in court.’”

Schultz said the targeting of small companies and individual inventors is particularly troubling because “startups and small companies are really part of the excitement of the technological innovations happening surrounding the web.”

Perhaps the most galling thing about so-called “intellectual property holding companies,” Schultz said, is that they generally innovate nothing on their own, instead keeping an eye out for idle patents that they can snatch up and enforce as a source of revenue.

“Companies like Acacia acquire patents that are sitting there gathering dust,” Schulz said. “They look for patents that are vague enough that they can argue it applies to some broad area, like video streaming, and then they try to get some settlements. They don’t innovating anything, either — God forbid they do a little [research and development].”

Asked what could be done to reform the patent system, Schulz told XBIZ that there are several options that could help.

“The most difficult, politically, is to change the Patent and Trademark Office,” Schulz said. “It’s not really the fault of the people working at the PTO; they are not given the resources, the support or the training to deal with bogus patents.”

Schulz explained that PTO employees charged with reviewing patent applications are given only 15 to 20 hours total to review incoming patents, which he said is not nearly sufficient to properly research possible prior art and other roadblocks to each given patent.

Schulz said another option would be to make the patent speculating business less profitable by limiting the amount of money that patent holders can win through legal action.

A third option, Schultz said, is to reduce the cost and time associated with filing challenges to invalid patents — precisely the thing that EFF currently is doing in its patent debunking project. If the price and complexity of filing such challenges is reduced, more of the technology community could get involved, Schultz said.

“Filing for re-examination has been fairly successful,” Schulz said. “But it is a long and expensive process.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Show More