Court Reverses $520 Million Ruling Against Microsoft

WASHINGTON — An appeals court yesterday threw out a $520.6 million jury verdict that found Microsoft had infringed on patents held by Eolas Technologies Inc.

In the case, Microsoft was accused of using Eolas technology to embed and invoke interactive objects, such as applets and plugins, within its Internet Explorer web browser. The decision had could have forced changes in millions of web pages that use plugin applications, such as Macromedia Flash and Adobe Acrobat, that run inside the browser.

U.S. patent No. 5,838,906, which Eolas licenses from the University of California, protects the execution of remote code embedded in hypertext pages. In 2003, a jury found that Microsoft IE had infringed on the patent and awarded damages of $1.47 for each copy on the 350 million copies of Windows that Microsoft shipped worldwide between November 1998 and September 2001.

Microsoft denied the infringement and asserted that Eolas’ patent claims were invalid based on the existence of “prior art” and widespread belief that the technology has been an integral part of the web long before the patent was issued.

Nonetheless, the decision was upheld in U.S. District Court in 2004. Microsoft appealed the ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, leading to today’s reversal of the lower court decision.

“It's a huge victory,” said Andy Culbert, associate general counsel of patent litigation for Microsoft. “The essence of our defense was that this patent was invalid, based on the good work done by Pei Wei, and the court of appeals has completely vindicated our assertions.”

Culbert was referring to what he claims is evidence that Eolas did not invest in or contribute to development of the patented technology, and that it was actually developed by Pie-yuan Wei of O’Reilly & Associates, which would substantiate the company’s “prior art” argument.

Despite Culbert’s enthusiasm, Microsoft can claim only a partial victory because the case is being sent back to U.S. District Court for a second jury trial. However, Culbert added that he plans to produce evidence at retrial proving that Eolas knowingly withheld information about Wei’s invention from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

German Court: Regulator Can't Block Entire IG Accounts, Only Posts

A German court has ruled that while a regional media regulatory agency may block specific Instagram posts that include material deemed harmful to minors, it cannot ban an entire Instagram account due to such a post.

Brazil Lays Out Preliminary Guidelines for New AV Requirements

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Wednesday signed a decree establishing guidelines for new regulations requiring adult websites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Senate Committee Debates Section 230 Reform

The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing Wednesday on potential changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

Pearl Industry Network Offers Free Creator Memberships

Industry trade group Pearl Industry Network (PiN) has launched its free creator membership initiative.

Sam Bird Acquires Fanblast

Sam Bird, former co-director of global talent agency Surge, has acquired creator monetization tool Fanblast and named himself CEO.

'SheHerGirls' Launches Through Paysite.com

The braintrust behind PoleVixens has officially launched a new membership site, SheHerGirls, also through Paysite.com.

FTC Invites Public Comment on 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced this week that it is seeking public comment on whether it should amend its Negative Option Rule to better address deceptive or unfair practices.

Aylo Rebuts Indiana AV Suit Claims Over VPN Access

Aylo this week asked a Marion Superior Court judge to dismiss Indiana’s lawsuit alleging that the company violated the state’s age verification law by failing to prevent access by users who employ VPNs and similar means to avoid geolocation.

'PSMTickling' Launches Through Paysite.com

PSMTickling.com has officially launched through Paysite.com.

Show More