Court Reverses $520 Million Ruling Against Microsoft

WASHINGTON — An appeals court yesterday threw out a $520.6 million jury verdict that found Microsoft had infringed on patents held by Eolas Technologies Inc.

In the case, Microsoft was accused of using Eolas technology to embed and invoke interactive objects, such as applets and plugins, within its Internet Explorer web browser. The decision had could have forced changes in millions of web pages that use plugin applications, such as Macromedia Flash and Adobe Acrobat, that run inside the browser.

U.S. patent No. 5,838,906, which Eolas licenses from the University of California, protects the execution of remote code embedded in hypertext pages. In 2003, a jury found that Microsoft IE had infringed on the patent and awarded damages of $1.47 for each copy on the 350 million copies of Windows that Microsoft shipped worldwide between November 1998 and September 2001.

Microsoft denied the infringement and asserted that Eolas’ patent claims were invalid based on the existence of “prior art” and widespread belief that the technology has been an integral part of the web long before the patent was issued.

Nonetheless, the decision was upheld in U.S. District Court in 2004. Microsoft appealed the ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, leading to today’s reversal of the lower court decision.

“It's a huge victory,” said Andy Culbert, associate general counsel of patent litigation for Microsoft. “The essence of our defense was that this patent was invalid, based on the good work done by Pei Wei, and the court of appeals has completely vindicated our assertions.”

Culbert was referring to what he claims is evidence that Eolas did not invest in or contribute to development of the patented technology, and that it was actually developed by Pie-yuan Wei of O’Reilly & Associates, which would substantiate the company’s “prior art” argument.

Despite Culbert’s enthusiasm, Microsoft can claim only a partial victory because the case is being sent back to U.S. District Court for a second jury trial. However, Culbert added that he plans to produce evidence at retrial proving that Eolas knowingly withheld information about Wei’s invention from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Italian Court in Aylo Case Limits International Reach of AV Rules

An Italian administrative court has ruled that Italy’s recently-enacted age verification rules for adult content may not currently be enforced against sites based in other EU member states, pending further procedural action under the EU’s Directive on Electronic Commerce.

OCC, FDIC Prohibit Use of 'Reputation Risk' by Regulators

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on Tuesday issued a final rule codifying the elimination of ‘reputation risk’ from their supervision of financial institutions.

Wisconsin Governor Vetoes Age Verification Bill

Gov. Tony Evers on Friday vetoed AB 105, an age verification bill that would have allowed anyone to sue adult content providers for damages over alleged failure to age-verify users in Wisconsin, with penalties of up to $10,000 per violation.

FSC Releases Statement on Wisconsin Governor Vetoing AV Bill

The Free Speech Coalition has released a statement on Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers' veto of the state's age verification legislation.

AV Bulletin: West Virginia Enacts AV Law, Ohio 'Innocence Act' Advances

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Woodhull Survey Reveals Concern Among Sex Educators Over AV Laws' Impact on Access

A national survey of sex educators by the Woodhull Freedom Foundation found that a majority of sex educators and sexual health professionals are concerned that age verification (AV) laws will negatively impact access to information and resources.

Clips4Sale Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has ruled in favor of content platform Clips4Sale in a case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the site.

Pineapple Support, SextPanther to Host Stress Management Support Group

Pineapple Support and SextPanther are hosting a free online support group focused on stress management for performers.

Goddess Tangent Launches New Site Through Grooby's Blue.xxx

Goddess Tangent has launched her new membership site, TangentOD.com, through Grooby's website management company Blue.xxx.

Show More