Court Reverses $520 Million Ruling Against Microsoft

WASHINGTON — An appeals court yesterday threw out a $520.6 million jury verdict that found Microsoft had infringed on patents held by Eolas Technologies Inc.

In the case, Microsoft was accused of using Eolas technology to embed and invoke interactive objects, such as applets and plugins, within its Internet Explorer web browser. The decision had could have forced changes in millions of web pages that use plugin applications, such as Macromedia Flash and Adobe Acrobat, that run inside the browser.

U.S. patent No. 5,838,906, which Eolas licenses from the University of California, protects the execution of remote code embedded in hypertext pages. In 2003, a jury found that Microsoft IE had infringed on the patent and awarded damages of $1.47 for each copy on the 350 million copies of Windows that Microsoft shipped worldwide between November 1998 and September 2001.

Microsoft denied the infringement and asserted that Eolas’ patent claims were invalid based on the existence of “prior art” and widespread belief that the technology has been an integral part of the web long before the patent was issued.

Nonetheless, the decision was upheld in U.S. District Court in 2004. Microsoft appealed the ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, leading to today’s reversal of the lower court decision.

“It's a huge victory,” said Andy Culbert, associate general counsel of patent litigation for Microsoft. “The essence of our defense was that this patent was invalid, based on the good work done by Pei Wei, and the court of appeals has completely vindicated our assertions.”

Culbert was referring to what he claims is evidence that Eolas did not invest in or contribute to development of the patented technology, and that it was actually developed by Pie-yuan Wei of O’Reilly & Associates, which would substantiate the company’s “prior art” argument.

Despite Culbert’s enthusiasm, Microsoft can claim only a partial victory because the case is being sent back to U.S. District Court for a second jury trial. However, Culbert added that he plans to produce evidence at retrial proving that Eolas knowingly withheld information about Wei’s invention from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Sansyl Group Acquires Blue Donkey Media

Sansyl Group, parent company of AdultPrime Network, has acquired Blue Donkey Media B.V., owner of Dutch adult site Meiden van Holland, among several other erotic websites and television channels.

Pineapple Support to Hold Mental Health Summit

The annual Pineapple Support Mental Health Summit is taking place Dec. 15-17.

Ofcom Fines AVS Group $1.3 Million for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Wednesday imposed a penalty of one million pounds, or approximately $1.3 million, on AVS Group Ltd. after an investigation concluded that the company had failed to implement robust age checks on 18 adult websites.

Updated: Aylo to Help Test EU Age Verification App

Pornhub parent company Aylo plans to participate in the European Commission’s pilot program for its “white label” age verification app, a spokesperson for the company has confirmed.

Missouri Lawmaker Attempts to Revive 'Health Warnings' for Adult Sites

A Missouri state representative has introduced a bill that would require adult sites to post notices warning users of alleged physical, mental, and social harms associated with pornography, despite a previous federal court ruling against such requirements.

New Age Verification Service 'BorderAge' Launches

French startup company Needemand has officially launched its subscription-based age verification solution, BorderAge.

Ruling: Italy's 'Porn Tax' Applies to All Content Creators

Italy’s tax revenue agency has ruled that the nation’s 25% “ethical tax” on income generated from adult content applies even to smaller independent online content creators.

Proposed New Hampshire AV Bill Appears to Violate Constitution

A bill in the New Hampshire state legislature, aimed at requiring adult sites to age-verify users in that state, contains a provision that seemingly contradicts the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution.

AEBN Publishes Report on Fetish Trends

AEBN has published a report on fetish categories from its straight and gay theaters.

Online Child Protection Hearing to Include Federal AV Bill

A House subcommittee will hold a hearing next week on a slate of bills aimed at protecting minors online, including the SCREEN Act, which would make site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content federal law.

Show More