IBill Parent Hires Firm to Restructure Company

DEERFIELD BEACH, Fla. — The current owners of iBill have hired a company specializing in turnarounds to help revive the ailing third-party processor.

Interactive Brand Development said that it signed an agreement last month with Corporate Revitalization Partners, a Dallas, Texas, firm that has assisted hundreds of distressed companies restructure their businesses.

Since last month, Corporate Revitalization has staffed senior executives on-site at iBill's corporate headquarters in Deerfield Beach, Fla., to advise on day-to-day management, as well as general corporate matters, for iBill.

IBill’s parent in a statement said that Corporate Revitalization will be compensated on “performance-based incentive payments based on predetermined financial goals.” The contract is scheduled to run through mid June.

Steve Markley, CEO of Interactive Brand, said in the release that Corporate Revitalization has “recent demonstrable success that our board determined would be valuable to our company and our shareholders, including advising our company in stock exchange compliance, financial reporting, controls and procedures, as well as assisting us in management of our daily operations.”

Interactive Brand, which also owns a significant interest in Penthouse Media Group, was delisted from the AMEX in January and moved its listing to the Pink Sheets after weeks on the so-called “grey market.”

When public companies move over to the 101-year-old Pink Sheets, they are typically forced onto that exchange by dire financial circumstances, or because a firm is closely held by one or two investors with very few shares outstanding.

In Interactive Brand’s case, it was a laundry list of reasons.

The problems AMEX cited as reasons for the delisting include:

— The company is financially impaired, with a working capital deficit of $37,000 as of Sept. 30.

— Interactive Brand's purchase of a nearly 40 percent minority interest in Penthouse Media Group and the financing complete the acquisition. This, AMEX said, resulted in Interactive Brand being bought by an unlisted company. That purchase, AMEX said, means Interactive Brand no longer satisfies initial listing standards.

— The company has issued or authorized its transfer agent to issue additional common shares without AMEX's approval.

— The company has made inaccurate representations in Securities and Exchange Commission filings relating to the number of shares of its common stock outstanding. AMEX said it looked at Interactive Brand's Schedule 14A filed Nov. 1, its Form 10-Q for the quarter ending Sept. 30 and a transfer activity report maintained by the company's transfer agent.

— Interactive Brand issued 20 percent or more of its currently outstanding common shares without first getting shareholder approval and also issued shares to consultants without first getting shareholder approval.

— The company did not get an appropriate review from its audit committee of related party transactions.

— Interactive Brand did not file complete information in response to AMEX's request for additional information.

— Operations contrary to the public interest, which AMEX said include Interactive Brand's apparent selective disclosure of material nonpublic information in July and insider trading of securities while in possession of nonpublic information in July. AMEX also said the company engaged in transactions not in the economic interest of shareholders or where there does not appear to have been adequate scrutiny. That later complaint references terms of Interactive Brand's attempted acquisition of Media Billing Co., which owns iBill.

After a bid to appeal AMEX’s delisting, Interactive Brand withdrew its challenge in mid February.

Interactive Brand, however, hopes to turn around its corporate woes in the near future.

“Although no assurances can be made, IBD intends to move for a listing of its common shares on the OTCBB or NASDAQ SmallCap in the immediate future,” the company said in a statement Monday.

Interactive Brand and iBill officials did not return calls to XBiz for this story.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

New Age Verification Service 'AgeWallet' Launches

Tech company Brady Mills Agency has officially launched its subscription-based age verification solution, AgeWallet.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for September, October

AEBN has published the top search terms for the months of September and October from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Creator, Influencer YesKingzTV Passes Away at 47

Adult content creator and social media personality YesKingzTV, aka Micheal Willis Heard, has passed away at the age of 47.

Pre-Nominations Now Open for 2026 TEAs

The pre-nomination period for the 2026 Trans Erotica Awards (TEAs) is now open.

FSC Releases Updated Age Verification Toolkit

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the release of its updated age verification toolkit.

Duke Tax Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

Duke Tax has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

UK Moving Ahead with Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The U.K. government has announced its intent to follow through on criminalizing “choking” content, a plan that was announced earlier this year.

Italy to Require Age Verification for Adult Sites

Italian media regulator AGCOM has announced that all sites and platforms hosting adult content will be required to implement age verification systems starting Nov. 12 to prevent access by users under 18.

'MILFlicious' Launches Through YourPaysitePartner

MILFlicious.com has officially launched through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Op-Ed: The Guardian's XBIZ Amsterdam Podcast Dismisses Creators' Experiences

British newspaper The Guardian’s podcast coverage of XBIZ Amsterdam 2025 purports to investigate the power dynamics of today’s online adult industry. Instead, it ignores creators’ voices, airs tired and outdated preconceptions about the business, and rehashes the unsupported claims of anti-pornography crusaders.

Show More