Extreme Associates Ruling Isn’t Necessarily Victory for Adult

JOHNSTOWN, Pa. — Friday’s federal court decision dismissing obscenity charges against the owners of Extreme Associates Inc. presents a victory for Rob Black and partner Janet Romano, buts its implications for adult industry as a whole remain up in the air, a legal expert says.

While the ruling is currently being considered a blow to the Justice Department’s two-year pursuit of Extreme, it could also set a dangerous precedent if it is appealed and reversed by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

U.S. District Judge Gary L. Lancaster in Pittsburgh found federal obscenity laws unconstitutional as applied to the case of Black, aka Robert Zicari, of Chatsworth, Calif.

The case against Black, owner of gonzo-themed ExtremeAssociates.com, was the first federal obscenity prosecution against a video manufacturer in a decade. If convicted, Black and Romano faced up to 50 years in prison and a fine of $2.5 million.

The government’s case zeroed-in on the video ''Forced Entry,'' which stars and is directed by Black's wife, Romano, under the name Lizzie Borden. The company bills the film as a ''stunningly disturbing look at a serial killer, Satanic rituals, and the depths of human depravity.''

In a release shortly after the ruling, U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan in Johnstown, Pa., said that her office is “reviewing the ruling and examining our options, which could include an appeal to the [3rd Circuit].”

A spokeswoman for Buchanan on Monday would not elaborate on the Justice Department’s next step, but First Amendment attorney J. D. Obenberger expounded on possible legal scenarios.

“The government will surely move for reconsideration. Reconsideration will probably be denied,” Obenberger said. “Then the government must decide whether to appeal the decision.

“By doing so, it risks that the 3rd Circuit, sitting in Philadelphia, will affirm, broading the precedential [binding] effect of this decision to a much larger part of the East.

“After resolution by the 3rd Circuit, either side might then seek review in the U.S. Supreme Court. When before the Supreme Court, the validity of all obscenity statutes as applied to COPA-compliant adult sites, will be in issue.”

With the Justice Department’s initial blow in United States vs. Extreme Associates Inc., No. 03-0203, Obenberger said that obscenity indictments will continue, despite Friday’s ruling.

“We cannot expect the obscenity laws to fall like apples from a tree in Autumn,” he said. “This decision binds no other court and it is very, very possible that other judges in other jurisdictions will disagree as the issue comes before them.”

In related news, ABC's "Nightline" will conduct an interview with Black and discuss the case against Extreme Associates. Monday's program begins at 11:30 p.m.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

UK Government May Limit 'Step' Porn Ban With New Amendments

The U.K. Ministry of Justice on Friday revealed new government amendments to the pending Crime and Policing Bill, potentially limiting a pending ban on “step” content to apply only if adult performers role-play as minors.

Arizona Senate Removes 'Catch-22' Provision From Consent Bill

The Arizona State Senate has amended a bill that would impose new requirements for adult content uploaded online, removing a seemingly contradictory provision that could have effectively made it impossible for adult sites to operate in the state.

Italian Court in Aylo Case Limits International Reach of AV Rules

An Italian administrative court has ruled that Italy’s recently-enacted age verification rules for adult content may not currently be enforced against sites based in other EU member states, pending further procedural action under the EU’s Directive on Electronic Commerce.

OCC, FDIC Prohibit Use of 'Reputation Risk' by Regulators

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on Tuesday issued a final rule codifying the elimination of ‘reputation risk’ as a criterion in their supervision of financial institutions.

Wisconsin Governor Vetoes Age Verification Bill

Gov. Tony Evers on Friday vetoed AB 105, an age verification bill that would have allowed anyone to sue adult content providers for damages over alleged failure to age-verify users in Wisconsin, with penalties of up to $10,000 per violation.

FSC Releases Statement on Wisconsin Governor Vetoing AV Bill

The Free Speech Coalition has released a statement on Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers' veto of the state's age verification legislation.

AV Bulletin: West Virginia Enacts AV Law, Ohio 'Innocence Act' Advances

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Woodhull Survey Reveals Concern Among Sex Educators Over AV Laws' Impact on Access

A national survey of sex educators by the Woodhull Freedom Foundation found that a majority of sex educators and sexual health professionals are concerned that age verification (AV) laws will negatively impact access to information and resources.

Clips4Sale Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has ruled in favor of content platform Clips4Sale in a case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the site.

Show More