Extreme Associates Ruling Isn’t Necessarily Victory for Adult

JOHNSTOWN, Pa. — Friday’s federal court decision dismissing obscenity charges against the owners of Extreme Associates Inc. presents a victory for Rob Black and partner Janet Romano, buts its implications for adult industry as a whole remain up in the air, a legal expert says.

While the ruling is currently being considered a blow to the Justice Department’s two-year pursuit of Extreme, it could also set a dangerous precedent if it is appealed and reversed by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

U.S. District Judge Gary L. Lancaster in Pittsburgh found federal obscenity laws unconstitutional as applied to the case of Black, aka Robert Zicari, of Chatsworth, Calif.

The case against Black, owner of gonzo-themed ExtremeAssociates.com, was the first federal obscenity prosecution against a video manufacturer in a decade. If convicted, Black and Romano faced up to 50 years in prison and a fine of $2.5 million.

The government’s case zeroed-in on the video ''Forced Entry,'' which stars and is directed by Black's wife, Romano, under the name Lizzie Borden. The company bills the film as a ''stunningly disturbing look at a serial killer, Satanic rituals, and the depths of human depravity.''

In a release shortly after the ruling, U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan in Johnstown, Pa., said that her office is “reviewing the ruling and examining our options, which could include an appeal to the [3rd Circuit].”

A spokeswoman for Buchanan on Monday would not elaborate on the Justice Department’s next step, but First Amendment attorney J. D. Obenberger expounded on possible legal scenarios.

“The government will surely move for reconsideration. Reconsideration will probably be denied,” Obenberger said. “Then the government must decide whether to appeal the decision.

“By doing so, it risks that the 3rd Circuit, sitting in Philadelphia, will affirm, broading the precedential [binding] effect of this decision to a much larger part of the East.

“After resolution by the 3rd Circuit, either side might then seek review in the U.S. Supreme Court. When before the Supreme Court, the validity of all obscenity statutes as applied to COPA-compliant adult sites, will be in issue.”

With the Justice Department’s initial blow in United States vs. Extreme Associates Inc., No. 03-0203, Obenberger said that obscenity indictments will continue, despite Friday’s ruling.

“We cannot expect the obscenity laws to fall like apples from a tree in Autumn,” he said. “This decision binds no other court and it is very, very possible that other judges in other jurisdictions will disagree as the issue comes before them.”

In related news, ABC's "Nightline" will conduct an interview with Black and discuss the case against Extreme Associates. Monday's program begins at 11:30 p.m.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Utah Governor Signs 'Porn Tax' and VPN Rule Into Law

Governor Spencer Cox on Friday signed into law a bill to tax adult websites and make them liable if minors circumvent geolocation.

German Court: Regulator Can't Block Creator's IG Account, Only Posts

A German court has ruled that while a regional media regulatory agency may block specific Instagram posts that include material deemed harmful to minors, it cannot ban an entire Instagram account due to such a post.

Brazil Lays Out Preliminary Guidelines for New AV Requirements

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Wednesday signed a decree establishing guidelines for new regulations requiring adult websites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Senate Committee Debates Section 230 Reform

The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing Wednesday on potential changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

FTC Invites Public Comment on 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced this week that it is seeking public comment on whether it should amend its Negative Option Rule to better address deceptive or unfair practices.

Aylo Rebuts Indiana AV Suit Claims Over VPN Access

Aylo this week asked a Marion Superior Court judge to dismiss Indiana’s lawsuit alleging that the company violated the state’s age verification law by failing to prevent access by users who employ VPNs and similar means to avoid geolocation.

Kansas Plaintiff Drops Chaturbate AV Suit, Revamps SuperPorn Complaint

The plaintiff in a lawsuit alleging that cam platform Chaturbate violated Kansas’ age verification law has voluntarily dismissed that action, while retooling a similar complaint against adult site SuperPorn.

AV Bulletin: Loopholes and Lawsuits

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Utah 'Porn Tax' Bill Will Head to Governor's Desk

A bill that would tax adult websites and make them liable if minors circumvent geolocation has passed the Utah state legislature and will soon head to the office of Gov. Spencer Cox for signature or veto.

Pornhub to Restrict Access in Australia as AV Rules Take Effect

Pornhub parent company Aylo will restrict access to its free video-sharing platforms in Australia in response to new age verification regulations, the company confirmed Thursday.

Show More