Company Sues Spam Accuser

MACHESTER, N.H. — A company accused of violating spam rules is asserting its innocence by suing the individual who made the allegation.

Jay Stuler reported to several ISPs that New Hampshire-based Atriks, otherwise known as Distributed Mail, sent him large amounts of unsolicited bulk email over a period from April 2003 onward.

According to court papers, Stuler’s accusation cost Atriks its accounts with ISPs Lightship Telecom, Spectra Access and North Atlantic Internet, essentially preventing the company from conducting business.

But Atriks asserts its email methods are completely legal and not in breach of the U.S. CAN-SPAM Act. And the company wants Stuler to pay for financial damage caused by lost ISP contracts.

A call to Atriks' CEO from XBiz was not returned, but in its legal submission, the company claims: “Atriks does not originate or send commercial email to third parties, and does not otherwise conduct activities regulated by the CAN-SPAM Act.”

According to Atriks’ website, the company manages “the business and consumer data needs of many Fortune 1000 companies across the U.S., as well as the comprehensive data requirements of the U.S. homeland security effort."

However, independent antispam group Spamhaus said it has received numerous complaints about Atriks in the past.

A quick search of the Spamhaus database by XBiz turned up 28 records related to Atriks, including entries in which Spamhaus claims Atriks installed software on people's PCs without permission and sent email with misleading subject lines.

Spamhaus also says Atriks’ “VirtualMDA system appears to violate the recent CAN-SPAM law by falsifying the transmission path.”

While Stuler’s attorney has advised him not to speak with the media, he has written on his personal website that he believes “this is a frivolous lawsuit designed to harass and intimidate. If I can be sued simply for complaining about spammers, then anyone can be.”

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Final IRS 'No Tax on Tips' Rule Excludes Pornography

The Internal Revenue Service on Monday published final regulations on the “No Tax on Tips” provision included in the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” offering new tax deductions for tip workers but excluding revenue received for “pornographic activity.”

Pennsylvania Legislature Weighs 'Porn Tax' Bill

The Pennsylvania State Senate is considering a bill that would impose a 10% tax on the revenue of adult websites doing business in that state.

Trump Tariffs Refund Process to Launch April 20

WASHINGTON — U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will begin the process of refunding duties paid under the Trump administration’s sweeping program of tariffs by providing, starting April 20, an online tool for submitting refund claims.

UK Government May Limit 'Step' Porn Ban With New Amendments

The U.K. Ministry of Justice on Friday revealed new government amendments to the pending Crime and Policing Bill, potentially limiting a planned ban on “step” content to apply only if adult performers role-play as minors.

Arizona Senate Removes 'Catch-22' Provision From Consent Bill

The Arizona State Senate has amended a bill that would impose new requirements for adult content uploaded online, removing a seemingly contradictory provision that could have effectively made it impossible for adult sites to operate in the state.

Italian Court in Aylo Case Limits International Reach of AV Rules

An Italian administrative court has ruled that Italy’s recently-enacted age verification rules for adult content may not currently be enforced against sites based in other EU member states, pending further procedural action under the EU’s Directive on Electronic Commerce.

OCC, FDIC Prohibit Use of 'Reputation Risk' by Regulators

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on Tuesday issued a final rule codifying the elimination of "reputation risk" as a criterion in their supervision of financial institutions.

Wisconsin Governor Vetoes Age Verification Bill

Gov. Tony Evers on Friday vetoed AB 105, an age verification bill that would have allowed anyone to sue adult content providers for damages over alleged failure to age-verify users in Wisconsin, with penalties of up to $10,000 per violation.

FSC Releases Statement on Wisconsin Governor Vetoing AV Bill

The Free Speech Coalition has released a statement on Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers’ veto of the state’s age-verification legislation.

AV Bulletin: West Virginia Enacts AV Law, Ohio 'Innocence Act' Advances

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Show More