Momentum Builds to Knock Down File-Sharing

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has been asked by numerous organizations to hear a claim brought by the recording and film industries against Internet file-sharing companies Grokster Ltd. and StreamCast Networks Inc.

Among Monday's petitioners siding with the industries were the Video Software Dealers Association, Association of American Publishers, Screen Actors Guild, Recording Artists Coalition, National Basketball Association and the commissioner of Major League Baseball. In addition, 41 state attorneys general also submitted briefs.

Briefs were also filed on behalf of recording artists Don Henley, Joe Walsh, Stevie Nicks and Sheryl Crow, as well as online music retailers Napster, MusicNet and DVD subscription provider NetFlix.

The organizations, state attorney generals and artists asked the court to finally resolve conflicting lower court rulings on file-sharing. They argued file-sharing programs pose risks to consumers, such as identity theft and being unwittingly exposed to spyware and child pornography.

In August, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a U.S. District Court ruling in a copyright lawsuit brought by the entertainment industry against Grokster Ltd. and StreamCast Networks Inc. But that ruling only applies to the states under the jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit.

In 2003, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling that successfully closed the Madster file-sharing service.

Attorneys for StreamCast, which operates Morpheus, filed a brief with the court, asking the justices not to overturn the 9th Circuit's ruling.

"The petitioners are grasping for straws when they disingenuously assert that the Supreme Court should review the matter," the company's lawyers wrote in a brief. "The law is clear and has already been decided."

Charles Baker of the Houston-based Porter & Hedges and he Electronic Frontier Foundation represent StreamCast Networks in the case, joined by StreamCast's Matthew A. Neco, on the opposition brief, while the San Francisco law firm Keker & Van Nest represents Grokster.

"The 9th Circuit got it right and applied the Supreme Court's own precedent in the Sony Betamax case," EFF attorney Fred von Lohmann said. "There is no reason to revisit the unanimous ruling of the 9th Circuit and insert judges into the design rooms of technologists across the nation."

U.S. justices are expected to decide whether it will take the case before the end of the year.

The case is Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer vs. Grokster, No. 04-480.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

France Reinstates Age Verification Rule for EU Sites

France’s highest court, the Council of State, on Tuesday reinstated age verification rules for EU-based sites under the country’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, ruling in favor of the French government and against Hammy Media.

Whisper Fans Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

Whisper Fans has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

Utherverse Launches 'Red Light Center' Virtual World

Virtual reality and metaverse technology company Utherverse has launched its new virtual world, RedLightCenter.io.

European Commission Approves AV Guidelines, Unveils Prototype App

The European Commission on Monday released its final, approved guidelines for protecting minors online under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and made public a “white label” age verification app intended to help sites and platforms comply with age verification rules under the DSA.

New Membership Site 'Sluts Corner' Launches

R18 Entertainment has launched a new membership site, SlutsCorner.com.

Roxie Rae Relaunches Site Through XSiteAbility

Roxie Rae has relaunched her site through XSiteAbility.

Federal Appeals Court Vacates FTC 'Click to Cancel' Rule Pending Review

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit on Tuesday vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions, pending further review.

NYC Adult Stores Lose Challenge to Zoning Law, May Face Relocation

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit on Tuesday upheld a lower court’s decision to allow enforcement of a 2001 zoning law aimed at forcing adult retail stores out of most parts of New York City.

FSC Drops Florida AV Lawsuit in Wake of SCOTUS Decision

A U.S. district court judge granted on Tuesday a motion by Free Speech Coalition to dismiss the trade association’s lawsuit over Florida’s age verification law, a case that had been on hold pending the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the constitutionality of state AV laws.

Show More