Is PayPal Discriminating Against Gay-Oriented Websites?

LOS ANGELES — Just as PayPal resolved the technical problems that plagued it in the last week, new reports have begun to circulate suggesting that the Internet payment processor may be narrowing its acceptable use policy to exclude gay mainstream websites, XBiz was told Friday.

Since July, several mainstream companies that target gay audiences, including a book publisher and a group of business consultants, have been dropped by PayPal for violating its acceptable use policy, even though the businesses are not sexually oriented. BadPuppy.com and its subsidiary sites, including well-known gay news website GayToday.com, were also dropped.

“This policy is of such abject stupidity that it’s complete bullshit,” Perry Brass, owner of Belhue Press, told XBiz Friday. “It could have come directly out of the Bush Administration.”

According to Brass, an award-winning author of, among other things, gay romance novels, PayPal told him that it decided to terminate his account because his website had covers from some of his books on it.

“They said the problem was that individuals were touching one another,” said Brass. “But the pictures on the covers of these novels aren’t any different than straight romance novels.”

Amanda Pires, a spokesperson for PayPal, said that PayPal does not have a policy that discriminates against sexual orientation.

Although she was unable to comment on specifics at deadline, Pires told XBiz that the accounts were probably closed because of a violation of PayPal's acceptable use agreement, which includes prohibitions against products that feature full-frontal nudity.

According to the acceptable use policy, the company prohibits, “any material or services suggesting sexual activity, any material or services designed to sexually arouse the viewer or reader, [and] non-adult services whose website marketing can be reasonably misconstrued as allowed adult material or services to be purchase using PayPal.”

"The point of [shutting down the accounts] is not to discriminate against sexual orientation," said Pires. "The point is that we're trying to deter people from violating the acceptable use policy."

Pires also pointed out that PayPal's decision to close down accounts that deal in adult-oriented material was a business decision and not a moral one.

"When we exited doing business with the adult entertainment industry, it was because of the risk and fraud that seem to be common in it," Pires said.

According to Pires, the risk involved in dealing with the adult industry was too great to justify.

Also dropped by PayPal was H.I.M. Corp., whose website reads, “Your Gay and Lesbian Business Consultants.”

“Connecting businesses, large and small, with the Gay & Lesbian Marketplace,” reads the H.I.M. Corp. website. It also says the company offers “turn-key software solutions” for gay businesses.

Matt Skallerud, president of H.I.M. Corp., stated that the only possible websites that may have had adult-material on them would be two personals websites that his company runs. However, the content on those sites would only be available to members.

“I can only assume that they consider these sites adult by their very nature [of being gay] and not because there was actually adult material in them,” Skallerud told online newsletter PressPass Q in September.

“This is purely an attempt to censor websites,” said Brass. “My site hasn’t changed since it was originally reviewed when I joined PayPal.”

Brass also questions PayPal’s actions after they notified him, suggesting that the company engaged in doubletalk and contradictions in its dealings.

“First, I got an email saying that the PayPal account for my website had been terminated. Then, when I went out to check my account, it said it was on ‘limited usage,’ which basically meant that they’d keep all money from my website for six months,” said Brass. “To get the account reinstated, they said I’d have to remove all the book covers and sign an affidavit saying I’d never violate their policy again.”

“I basically told them to go to hell,” Brass said.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Utah Governor Signs 'Porn Tax' and VPN Rule Into Law

Governor Spencer Cox on Friday signed into law a bill to tax adult websites and make them liable if minors circumvent geolocation.

BranditScan Launches 'White Glove' Subscription Tier

BranditScan has launched its new White Glove subscription tier for creators.

German Court: Regulator Can't Block Creator's IG Account, Only Posts

A German court has ruled that while a regional media regulatory agency may block specific Instagram posts that include material deemed harmful to minors, it cannot ban an entire Instagram account due to such a post.

Brazil Lays Out Preliminary Guidelines for New AV Requirements

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Wednesday signed a decree establishing guidelines for new regulations requiring adult websites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Senate Committee Debates Section 230 Reform

The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing Wednesday on potential changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

Pearl Industry Network Offers Free Creator Memberships

Industry trade group Pearl Industry Network (PiN) has launched its free creator membership initiative.

Sam Bird Acquires Fanblast

Sam Bird, former co-director of global talent agency Surge, has acquired creator monetization tool Fanblast and named himself CEO.

'SheHerGirls' Launches Through Paysite.com

The braintrust behind PoleVixens has officially launched a new membership site, SheHerGirls, also through Paysite.com.

FTC Invites Public Comment on 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced this week that it is seeking public comment on whether it should amend its Negative Option Rule to better address deceptive or unfair practices.

Aylo Rebuts Indiana AV Suit Claims Over VPN Access

Aylo this week asked a Marion Superior Court judge to dismiss Indiana’s lawsuit alleging that the company violated the state’s age verification law by failing to prevent access by users who employ VPNs and similar means to avoid geolocation.

Show More