Justices Won’t Take Online Information Case

WASHINGTON — In a case involving licensing agreements, online information and the right of freedom of speech, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by an Internet firm that claimed it had a right to publish real-time data from golf tournaments.

Without comment, the justices let stand a lower court ruling allowing the PGA to restrict media outlets from posting or selling the real-time scores to website publishers — unless media outlets purchase a licensing agreement from the PGA first.

The case involves Morris Communication Co., which began distributing scores its reporters obtained from the tournament's media center.

The court was asked to decide the legality of an opinion from 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that held the PGA has a legitimate business interest in keeping media companies from disseminating tournament scores online as they occur.

Atlanta, Ga.-based Morris Communication and the PGA both accused the other of seeking to control access to tour scores for commercial purposes. But the 11th Circuit agreed with the lower court that the PGA has the right to control those scores.

“PGA has accommodated Morris at every step along the way, has agreed to sell its product to Morris, and has acted appropriately to protect its economic interests and investments,” Judge Joel F. Dubina wrote for the 11th Circuit in April. “Yet Morris demands that it be given access to the product of PGA’s proprietary RTSS (Real Time Scoring System), without compensating PGA, so that Morris can sell that product to others for a fee."

Morris complained that the PGA’s online service regulations make it the only entity that can sell real-time golf scores, and thus, violating the Sherman Act by monopolizing the market of compiled real-time golf scores.

PGA regulations include a provision that media organizations wait to post the scores the PGA compiles until the PGA posts them on its website, or until 30 minutes have passed since the shot-whichever comes first. Another provision of the contract bars companies from selling the scoring information to third – unless they buy a license to do so from the PGA.

In the case, the PGA contended it wasn’t trying to control information but simply tried to keep Morris from taking information the PGA spends a lot of money to compile and disseminate for free to the media.

The PGA Tour forbids cell phones and palm pilots on the course, so they don’t disrupt play and the PGA’s RTSS is the only source of compiled golf scores.

The dispute drew attention from the Georgia Press Association, Cox Enterprises and the New York Times Co., which worried that a ruling in favor of the PGA would limit the media’s ability to report the news.

The case is Morris Communication Co. vs. PGA Tour, No. 04-266.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Federal AV Proposal Passes House, Faces Senate Opposition

The U.S. House of Representatives on Monday passed the Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act, which includes provisions to make age verification by adult websites federal law, but the bill still faces tough going in the Senate.

AV Bulletin: Midyear Roundup

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, more state age verification laws have been enacted around the United States, as well as proposed at the federal level and in other countries. Meanwhile, lawsuits resulting from AV laws have begun to play out in the courts. This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Judge Dismisses Last NCOSE-Backed Suit Over Kansas AV Law

A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit alleging that adult site SuperPorn violated Kansas’ age verification law, citing lack of jurisdiction after similarly dismissing two related cases earlier this year.

Federal AV Proposal Scores Minor Win in House but Remains in Doubt

A newly announced bipartisan agreement in the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce may soon bring a proposed federal age verification law before the full House, but the measure continues to face an uphill battle.

Arizona Governor Vetoes 'Protect Act' With New Consent Provisions

Arizona Governor Kate Hobbs on Friday vetoed HB 2133, the “Protect Act,” which would have imposed new requirements for adult content uploaded online.

Brazil Begins Monitoring 18 Adult Sites for AV Compliance

Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) is now monitoring 18 high-traffic adult websites for compliance with the country’s Digital Statute for Children and Adolescents (Digital ECA), which requires such sites to age-verify users located in Brazil.

Ofcom Fines First Time Videos $100,000 for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday imposed a fine of 80,000 pounds (more than $100,000) against First Time Videos, which operates FTVGirls.com and FTVMilfs.com, for failing to implement age checks required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

EU Court: France Can Require Foreign Sites to Implement AV

The European Union’s Court of Justice ruled on Tuesday that France may require pornographic websites based in other EU states to implement age verification in accordance with French law, as long as France follows EU electronic commerce rules.

Lawsuit Alleging Meta Pirated VMG Content Will Move Forward

A U.S. district court on Thursday rejected Facebook parent company Meta’s motion to dismiss a suit by Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings, which accuses Meta of pirating VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Anti-Porn Senator Introduces Federal Age Verification Bill

U.S. Senator Jim Banks of Indiana, who last month urged the Department of Justice to ramp up obscenity prosecutions, on Wednesday introduced a bill that would make age verification by adult websites federal law.

Show More