Justices Won’t Take Online Information Case

WASHINGTON — In a case involving licensing agreements, online information and the right of freedom of speech, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by an Internet firm that claimed it had a right to publish real-time data from golf tournaments.

Without comment, the justices let stand a lower court ruling allowing the PGA to restrict media outlets from posting or selling the real-time scores to website publishers — unless media outlets purchase a licensing agreement from the PGA first.

The case involves Morris Communication Co., which began distributing scores its reporters obtained from the tournament's media center.

The court was asked to decide the legality of an opinion from 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that held the PGA has a legitimate business interest in keeping media companies from disseminating tournament scores online as they occur.

Atlanta, Ga.-based Morris Communication and the PGA both accused the other of seeking to control access to tour scores for commercial purposes. But the 11th Circuit agreed with the lower court that the PGA has the right to control those scores.

“PGA has accommodated Morris at every step along the way, has agreed to sell its product to Morris, and has acted appropriately to protect its economic interests and investments,” Judge Joel F. Dubina wrote for the 11th Circuit in April. “Yet Morris demands that it be given access to the product of PGA’s proprietary RTSS (Real Time Scoring System), without compensating PGA, so that Morris can sell that product to others for a fee."

Morris complained that the PGA’s online service regulations make it the only entity that can sell real-time golf scores, and thus, violating the Sherman Act by monopolizing the market of compiled real-time golf scores.

PGA regulations include a provision that media organizations wait to post the scores the PGA compiles until the PGA posts them on its website, or until 30 minutes have passed since the shot-whichever comes first. Another provision of the contract bars companies from selling the scoring information to third – unless they buy a license to do so from the PGA.

In the case, the PGA contended it wasn’t trying to control information but simply tried to keep Morris from taking information the PGA spends a lot of money to compile and disseminate for free to the media.

The PGA Tour forbids cell phones and palm pilots on the course, so they don’t disrupt play and the PGA’s RTSS is the only source of compiled golf scores.

The dispute drew attention from the Georgia Press Association, Cox Enterprises and the New York Times Co., which worried that a ruling in favor of the PGA would limit the media’s ability to report the news.

The case is Morris Communication Co. vs. PGA Tour, No. 04-266.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Utah VPN Rule Enforcement Pause Extended in Aylo Lawsuit

Provisions of a Utah law making adult websites liable if minors in the state circumvent geolocation efforts to bypass age verification, which were set to come into force in May, have again been put on hold temporarily.

Anti-Censorship Bill Could Shield US Sites From Foreign AV Laws

A Republican congressman has introduced legislation to bar U.S. courts from helping to enforce any foreign law restricting speech that would domestically be protected under the First Amendment, potentially including foreign age verification laws.

Romantix-Fargo Zoning Dispute Heads Back to District Court

A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that zoning officials in Fargo, North Dakota, acted in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner when they prevented sex toy retailer Romantix from opening a planned retail store in that city.

Appeals Court Upholds Section 230 Immunity in XVideos Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has upheld a lower court’s ruling that Section 230 protects WebGroup Czech Republic from liability in a case involving user-uploaded CSAM on its tube sites.

JustFor.fans Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has ruled in favor of JustFor.fans in a case against a website using an infringing domain.

Aylo Moves to Settle Two 'Children of Pornhub' Class-Action Lawsuits

Aylo has agreed to terms for a settlement with the plaintiffs in two long-running class actions over allegations that former Pornhub parent company MindGeek knowingly allowed and profited from CSAM on its sites.

FSC Hails Members, Allies in SCREEN Act Victory

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) released a statement today praising its members and allies after a successful lobbying effort to prevent the SCREEN Act, a nationwide age verification bill, from advancing out of the Commerce Committee for a full vote on the Senate floor.

SCREEN Act Stalls in Senate Committee Over Technicality

The Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday voted to approve the SCREEN Act, which would mandate nationwide site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content online, but a procedural issue blocked the bill from advancing to the full Senate.

SCREEN Act Back in Play: Federal AV Bill Faces Senate Hearing

The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation has slated a markup session this week for the SCREEN Act, which would mandate site-based age verification of users accessing adult content online on a national level.

Show More