ISPs Can Be Sued for Releasing Data Without Signed Warrant

ALEXANDRIA, Va. — An Internet service provider’s disclosure of a subscriber’s personal information is legally “intentional” if the act of releasing the information was deliberate and not merely inadvertent, a federal court has ruled.

The ruling is significant because it opens ISPs to civil liability when they reveal personal information on Internet users and businesses without a signed warrant.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held July 15 that America Online Inc.’s release of personal data information to law enforcement officials, in response to a faxed warrant application that had not been signed by a judge, could subject AOL to civil liability under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

AOL released the name, address, phone numbers, screen name, along with other information about the use of AOL services, to two detectives in Fairfield, Conn., who were probing the origin of an allegedly threatening email message.

That message, which was made by GoMaryGoAway@aol.com, was sent to several local political activists and stated, “The end is near.”

Police detectives preparing a warrant application set out their belief that the person who sent the email was engaged in unlawful harassment.

Both detectives signed the warrant application and a signature line designated with “Signed (judge of the superior court)” was left blank.

A judge’s signature does not appear anywhere on the warrant application.

AOL received the warrant application by fax and forwarded it internally to its legal department, where an AOL compliance and fraud investigator concluded that the warrant was valid.

That investigator faxed the subscriber information to the detectives.

Several months later, the subscriber filed a lawsuit against AOL, the detectives involved in the warrant application and the city, alleging a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

The AOL subscriber contended he suffered damage to his reputation and business, as well as emotional distress, after his political opponents, who received the information from the detectives, threatened to send the email to the local newspaper.

The case is Freedman vs. America Online Inc., No. 04-CV-475 ‘

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Show More