Email Marketer Wins Restraining Order

SAN BRUNO, Calif. – A Northern California District Court judge issued a restraining order to OptinRealBig.com owner and email marketer Scott Richter this week as part of a lawsuit against anti-spam company SpamCop and founder Julian Haight.

The judge's decision to hand down a temporary restraining order is part of an ongoing feud between two companies at absolute ends of the email spam spectrum: one that makes a living sending out floods of unsolicited email marketing material, and another that makes money combating those floods of annoying spam.

Richter's case against SpamCop and parent company IronPort began last month when the email marketer became fed up with SpamCop's persistent interference with his marketing contracts and business tactics. Richter claimed that SpamCop defamed his company and damaged potential future earnings.

SpamCop is a web-based service that reports incidents of so-called spamming to Internet service providers. SpamCop analyzes the headers of email spam samples sent by computer users, deletes the email addresses of those who file the complaints, and then sends emails to the abuse desks of all ISPs tracked in the header information.

SpamCop eventually pressures ISPs to terminate their relationships with certain spammers that continuously get identified by the system. However, Richter claims his service provides an opt-in option for email recipients and that his company has been wrongly accused of being a spammer.

According to an attorney close to the case, SpamCop has been filing reports against OptInRealBig since 2003.

The judge's ruling ordered SpamCop to stop reporting complaints about OptinRealBig.com to ISPs. The order will last until May 20 after which time the two companies will meet again in a courtroom to settle the landmark lawsuit that some analysts are saying could set a precedent for future lawsuits between email marketers and anti-spam security companies.

Richter, nicknamed the Spam King, originally filed a preliminary and permanent injunction against SpamCop for making what he claims were slanderous or libelous statements about OptinRealBig.com. Richter is also seeking $150,000 in damages.

In the meantime, Richter is the subject of a $20 million spam lawsuit filed in December 2003 by Microsoft and the New York Attorney General for allegedly sending more than 250,000 million spam emails. Microsoft and AG Eliot Spitzer are accusing Richter and his company of being part of a conspiracy to hijack computers and use them to send billions of illegal and deceptive spam messages.

Microsoft and Spitzer also have pending lawsuits against six other alleged spam companies, among them Delta7 Communications, Boxplay5.com, Webmed-RX.com, Safemed-RX.com, Teslianet, and Nutriworx.

None of the lawsuits filed by Microsoft and Spitzer are tied to anti-spam law Can-Spam and instead are filed under existing anti-fraud statutes.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

TTS Opens UK Testing Location

Talent Testing Service (TTS) has opened a new U.K. location in Ware, Hertfordshire.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

Sex Work CEO Debuts Upgraded 'GPTease' AI Assistant

Sex Work CEO has introduced the new Canvas in-chat editing feature to its AI-powered, NSFW text generator, GPTease.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Aylo Says It Will Comply With UK Age Assurance Requirements

Tech and media company Aylo, which owns various adult properties including Pornhub, YouPorn and Redtube, plans to introduce age assurance methods in the United Kingdom that satisfy government rules under the Online Safety Act, the company has announced.

Kyrgyzstan Parliament Approves Measure Outlawing Internet Porn

The Supreme Council of Kyrgyzstan on Wednesday passed legislation outlawing online adult content in the country.

Show More