California Anti-Spyware Bills Move Forward

SACRAMENTO – A pair of anti-spyware bills in California’s legislature moved forward on Tuesday.

Senate Bill 1436, introduced by Sen. Kevin Murray, D-Los Angeles, was approved by the Senate's Judiciary Committee. The piece of legislation would provide for a $1,000 fine for installing spyware on a computer in the state without giving the recipient notice. The bill will next be considered by the full Senate.

Assembly Bill 2787, introduced by Assemblyman Tim Leslie, R-Roseville, gained approval from the Assembly's Judiciary Committee. The bill would prohibit hijacking, surreptitious surveillance and inhibiting termination of a program. It will face the full Assembly before the end of May.

The issue of spyware, which is software that is employed unbeknownst to users, has been a hot topic for both consumers and legislators in the past few years.

Internet service provider EarthLink and Webroot Software commissioned a study recently that found the average computer houses roughly 28 items of monitoring software.

Other lawmakers also are turning to legislation to limit or eliminate spyware.

U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Conrad Burns, R.-Mont., recently introduced legislation to prohibit spyware, adware and other intrusive software. The proposed act, known as Spyblock, would make it illegal to install software on a user's computer without notice and consent.

The Federal Trade Commission last month held a hearing in Washington, D.C., to examine the matter. Titled "Monitoring Software on Your PC: Spyware, Adware, and Other Software," the hearing provided dialogue on the subject and looked for possible solutions.

Utah's recently passed anti-spyware law is currently being challenged by Salt Lake City-based WhenU, which claims the statute is unconstitutional and limits the online advertising company's right to commercial speech.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Arizona Senate Removes 'Catch-22' Provision From Consent Bill

The Arizona State Senate has amended a bill that would impose new requirements for adult content uploaded online, removing a seemingly contradictory provision that could have effectively made it impossible for adult sites to operate in the state.

Climaxx Media Launches Networking Platform

Climaxx Media has officially launched its new networking platform.

Italian Court in Aylo Case Limits International Reach of AV Rules

An Italian administrative court has ruled that Italy’s recently-enacted age verification rules for adult content may not currently be enforced against sites based in other EU member states, pending further procedural action under the EU’s Directive on Electronic Commerce.

OCC, FDIC Prohibit Use of 'Reputation Risk' by Regulators

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on Tuesday issued a final rule codifying the elimination of ‘reputation risk’ as a criterion in their supervision of financial institutions.

Wisconsin Governor Vetoes Age Verification Bill

Gov. Tony Evers on Friday vetoed AB 105, an age verification bill that would have allowed anyone to sue adult content providers for damages over alleged failure to age-verify users in Wisconsin, with penalties of up to $10,000 per violation.

FSC Releases Statement on Wisconsin Governor Vetoing AV Bill

The Free Speech Coalition has released a statement on Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers' veto of the state's age verification legislation.

AV Bulletin: West Virginia Enacts AV Law, Ohio 'Innocence Act' Advances

This roundup provides an update on the latest news and developments on the age verification front as it impacts the adult industry.

Woodhull Survey Reveals Concern Among Sex Educators Over AV Laws' Impact on Access

A national survey of sex educators by the Woodhull Freedom Foundation found that a majority of sex educators and sexual health professionals are concerned that age verification (AV) laws will negatively impact access to information and resources.

Clips4Sale Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has ruled in favor of content platform Clips4Sale in a case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the site.

Pineapple Support, SextPanther to Host Stress Management Support Group

Pineapple Support and SextPanther are hosting a free online support group focused on stress management for performers.

Show More