Backpage.com Trial: Defendants Ask Appeals Court to Remove Judge

Backpage.com Trial: Defendants Ask Appeals Court to Remove Judge

PHOENIX — Former Backpage owners Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday seeking an order to recuse the Phoenix federal judge presiding over their criminal trial.

In late September, as XBIZ reported, the defense requested that U.S. District Court in Arizona Judge Susan Brnovich recuse herself over public statements made by her husband, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a vocal activist against what he calls “human trafficking,” which includes a lurid pamphlet published by his office.

A month later, Judge Brnovich issued a ruling detailing her refusal to recuse herself from the case, denying the defendants' contention that evidence of her husband’s explicit activism against them as part of a crusade alleging “human trafficking” resulted in a conflict of interest and cast doubts on her impartiality.

Yesterday, Lacey and Jim Larkin filed a “petition for a writ of mandamus” with the Ninth Circuit, asking the higher court to intervene in what they see as a potential source of prejudice against them.

'Inaccurate Assumptions About Backpage'

The development was first reported today by news site FrontPageConfidential.com, which is published by Lacey and Larkin and edited by Stephen Lemons, and is the last journalistic remnant of their once-powerful company, Village Voice Media.

According to Lacey and Larkin’s mouthpiece, AG Mark Brnovich’s “inaccurate assumptions about Backpage go to the heart of the case and raise the specter of potential bias on behalf of the judge.”

“The petition argues that Arizona AG Brnovich ‘has interests that could be significantly affected by the outcome of the case,’ and that his statements and actions 'could cause reasonable people to question the court’s impartiality,'" FrontPageConfidential reported.

As they have since their initial recusal filing in September, Lacey and Larkin made much of AG Mark Brnovich’s tawdry “anti-trafficking” 2017 pamphlet “Human Trafficking: Arizona’s Not Buying It,” which features a cover portraying a stock photo of a very young woman wearing a skimpy top and leaning into the window of a car.

The sensationalistic 2017 pamphlet, still available as a government publication, wildly exaggerates the prevalence of what it calls “human trafficking” in Arizona, illustrates it with stock photography of young cis white women in peril that do not match any known statistics about actual human trafficking and repeatedly mentions Backpage.com — at the time of publication not yet shuttered by the FBI — as engaging in and central to “human trafficking.”

The pamphlet is so much presented as the thoughts of AG Brnovich that it even begins with an introduction titled “Letter From Mark” (sic) where the public servant — and husband of the federal judge in charge of Backpage’s prosecution — takes full ownership of the alarmist statements that follow.

The Issue of Prejudice

In yesterday’s filing, FrontPageConfidential reports, “the defense contends that AG Brnovich, others on his behalf and organizations with which he is associated with have vilified Backpage, assumed its complicity in sex trafficking and drawn conclusions about facts that will be at issue in the trial of Lacey, Larkin and their four co-defendants, which is scheduled to begin April 12, 2021, almost three years to the day after they were arrested by the FBI.”

According to Lacey and Larkin’s lawyers, the recusal “is required under 28 U.S. Code § 455, the federal law that states that any justice, judge or magistrate ‘shall disqualify [herself] in any proceeding in which [her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned’.”

Last month, Judge Susan Brnovich had convinced herself — writing in the third person — of her lack of bias to her own satisfaction, concluding in the formal refusal to recuse herself that Lacey and Larkin are now appealing that “the court will remain impartial in this matter, and no reasonable person fully informed of the facts would question the court’s impartiality based on the court’s marriage to AG Brnovich."

For more of XBIZ's coverage of the Backpage.com trial, click here.

Main Image: The Brnovichs, Arizona's legal power couple.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Woodhull Urges the Supreme Court to Find Texas AV Law Unconstitutional

The Woodhull Freedom Foundation and the Electronic Frontier Foundation submitted a brief to the United States Supreme Court on Thursday, urging the justices to rule against Texas’ age verification law.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for March and April

AEBN has released the top search terms for the months of  March and April from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

2024 XBIZ Creator Awards Winners Announced

Winners of the 2024 XBIZ Creator Awards were revealed Wednesday evening during a live ceremony at E11EVEN Nightclub in Miami, Florida. The event, presented by Fansly, was hosted by Siri Dahl and Little Puck.

'90s Japanese Performer Sues to Remove Titles from Streaming Site

Former Japanese performer Miyuki Ariga is suing the Fanza adult streaming site at the Tokyo District Court to remove four titles in which she appeared in 1994.

Free Speech Coalition Asks Court to Block Montana AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has asked the US District Court of Montana to block the state's new age verification law.

Segpay Launches Virtual 'Segcard' Creator Payout Solution

Segpay has updated its Segcard creator payout option by offering a new, virtual version.

Leading Conservative Think Tank Slams 5th Circuit for Upholding Texas Age Verification Law

Leading conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute has published an opinion piece penned by one of its senior fellows criticizing the 5th Circuit endorsement of Texas’ controversial age verification law.

OpenAI Shuts Down AI-Generated Porn Rumors

A spokesperson for OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, has shut down online chatter about how a rumored relaxation of the company’s stance against AI-generated NSFW content may result in a lifting of its porn ban.

9th Circuit Upholds Verdict Against Oregon College for Discriminating Against Former Adult Performer

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday upheld a 2022 Oregon jury’s verdict in favor of Nicole Gililland, a former nursing student who sued her school for discriminating against her because of her adult performer past.

Former Trump Staffer, Project 2025 Advisor John McEntee Predicts a Total Porn Ban

John McEntee, senior advisor to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 and a former key figure in the Trump administration, is predicting an eventual full ban on pornography, claiming that once it is enacted, “this country will flourish.”

Show More