3rd Circuit Upholds 2257 Recordkeeping Law

UPDATE: The Free Speech Coalition responds to the ruling here.

PHILADELPHIA — The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the core of 18 U.S.C. § 2257 requiring producers of pornography to keep records of the ages and identities of people appearing in explicit photos or videos.

A three-judge panel, asked to consider the constitutionality of the statutes' recordkeeping, labeling, and inspection requirements for adult entertainment companies, today affirmed a lower court’s denial of plaintiff Free Speech Coalition’s First Amendment claims, except with regard to one aspect — the inspection of records involving those taking place during normal business hours and at such places as specified in the statute.

The appeals court remanded the case back to the lower court to enter a judgment declaring that the warrantless searches during inspections violate the Fourth Amendment.  

But the Philadelphia-based 3rd Circuit ruled that the statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2257 and 2257A, are, for the most part, "narrowly tailored" and, therefore, constitutional.

 “We will also affirm in part the district court’s judgment that the statutes and regulations do not violate the First Amendment,” Judge D. Brooks Smith wrote in the decision, joined by Judges Anthony Scirica and Marjorie Rendell. “In light of our conclusion that the government must obtain a warrant before conducting a search under the statutes, however, we will remand to the district court to consider whether 28 C.F.R. § 75.5(c)(1)’s additional requirement that producers make their records available for at least 20 hours per week also violates the First Amendment.”

The nature of the state interest underlying the statutes — protecting children from sexual exploitation by the adult entertainment filmmakers — is compelling, the panel said.   

"The financial benefits accruing to producers from using youthful models as well as the financial benefits those models themselves enjoy, together with the difficulty of differentiating youthful adults from minors, all combine to increase the risks of children being exploited,” the 3rdCircuit said in its ruling. “That the statutes represent an effort to stem the tide of child pornography only after direct prohibitions have been insufficiently effective supports the statutes’ facial validity."

The 3rd Circuit panel said that there always is the possibility that someone making explicit works solely for private use or someone producing images of individuals clearly not underage could successfully challenge how the laws apply to them.

"The invalid applications of the statutes that plaintiffs have demonstrated still pale in comparison with the statutes’ legitimate applications, which counsels against holding the statutes facially invalid," the court wrote in the 65-page opinion.

"We fully recognize that certain explicit, non-obscene materials have artistic, educational, or other social value. Our resolution of plaintiffs’ facial challenge is not a value judgment as to plaintiffs’ work. Indeed, the purely private nature of some of the expressive conduct to which the statutes apply requires additional sensitivity to the core First Amendment values implicated in this case."

Adult entertainment attorney Lawrence Walters of Walters Law Group said that, “In sum, section 2257’s requirements have been upheld, and producers need to keep records.” 

“But the government will likely need a warrant before conducting an inspection,” Walters told XBIZ. “The case goes on, at the trial court level, and some additional refinements may be added to the final ruling.

“Given the ruling on the facial validity of the statute, it is essential that producers shore up their 2257 compliance efforts as soon as possible,” he said.

Walters emphasized that the court today “seemingly imposed a warrant requirement for 2257 inspections.”

“That essentially prevents the government from conducting random inspections, and requires that probable cause exist before producers can be subject to a 2257 inspection,” he said.

“While the loss on the First Amendment challenge is disappointing, the new requirement of a warrant helps prevent arbitrary or discriminatory enforcement of the law. Producers of 2257-triggering content will still need to maintain records, and can still be inspected without notice, but it appears the government must have probable cause that a crime has been committed before an inspection can occur. 

“While the court rendered an ‘as applied’ ruling, and only rendered a decision affecting the plaintiffs to in the suit, the language in the opinion appears broad enough to impose a warrant requirement, as standard operating procedure. Even assuming the plaintiffs’ fell within a ‘closely regulated’ industry, the circuit court concluded that its decision to impose a warrant before conducting a search would be the same.

“That suggests the ruling will be broadly applicable to in other cases involving erotic content.  In addition, the court remanded the case for further consideration of the impact of the Fourth Amendment ruling on the other First Amendment claims raised by the Plaintiffs, along with an evaluation of the requirement that producers have a custodian standing by for inspections for a minimum of 20 hours per week.”

View 2257 ruling

Related:  

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

Nadia Jay Stars in Latest From Brazzers

Nadia Jay stars with Mick Blue in the latest release from Brazzers, titled "Fucking the Bath Voyeur."

Tommy Gunn Reflects on His Legendary Past as He Looks to the Future

Tommy Gunn is wearing an eyepatch. It’s not an homage to the classic "Pirates" porn parody franchise, in which Gunn takes on the Johnny Depp role. The eyepatch is a temporary measure to help him deal with a nerve palsy that came out of nowhere several years ago and affects his vision from time to time. Gunn needs his vision. As one of the adult industry’s longest-serving male stars, he still has plenty to look forward to.

Rocco Siffredi Directs New Rebel Rhyder Showcase

Evil Angel has released Rocco Siffredi’s Rebel Rhyder showcase title, "Rebel Meets Rebel."

JuicyAds Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

JuicyAds has won its World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the company's site and defraud customers.

Shalina Devine Toplines 'Thr3e #7' From Dorcel

Shalina Devine headlines the latest release from Dorcel, titled "Thr3e #7."

Chloe Amour Headlines 'Unfaithful Betrayal 3' From Bellesa Films

Chloe Amour toplines the third volume of “Unfaithful Betrayal” from Bellesa Films.

Anissa Kate, Jordan Starr Top AEBN for Q2 of 2025

AEBN has published its top-selling stars for the second quarter of 2025, with Anissa Kate landing atop the leaderboard for straight theaters and Jordan Starr heading up the gay rankings.

Misty Addams Makes Her WIFEY Debut

Misty Addams stars with husband Island Boy Brandon and 2024 XMA Europas Male Performer of the Year Christian Clay in the latest release from Vixen Media Group studio imprint WIFEY.

AEBN Reveals Eva Maxim as Top Trans Star for Q2 of 2025

AEBN has published its top trans stars list for the second quarter of 2025, with Eva Maxim landing atop the leaderboard.

Show More