U.S. Can Open Mail Without Search Warrant

WASHINGTON — Although the White House denies any change in policy, a signing statement attached to postal legislation could allow the government to open first-class letters without a warrant, some experts said.

While the law requires government agents to obtain a warrant before searching first-class mail, Bush’s signing statement, attached to the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, indicates a possible change in policy, ACLU staff attorney Ann Beeson said.

“The signing statement raises serious questions whether he is authorizing opening of mail contrary to the Constitution and to laws enacted by Congress,” Beeson said. “What is the purpose of the signing statement if it isn't that?”

White House Press Secretary Tony Snow denied that the signing statement broke any new legal ground.

“All this is saying is that there are provisions at law for — in exigent circumstances — for such inspections,” Snow said. “It has been thus. This is not a change in law, this is not new.”

In the signing statement, Bush said his administration would construe the law’s key provision “in a manner consistent, to the maximum extent permissible, with the need to conduct searches in exigent circumstances.”

Postal Vice President Tom Day echoed the sentiments of Snow and the President, saying that it has been a long-standing practice to protect first-class mail in postal custody against unreasonable searches and seizures, but added that nothing had changed in terms of an individual’s right to privacy.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said he disagreed with what he sees as a shift in the law.

“Every American wants foolproof protection against terrorism,” Schumer said. “But history has shown it can and should be done within the confines of the Constitution. This last-minute, irregular and unauthorized reinterpretation of a duly passed law is the exact type of maneuver that voters so resoundingly rejected in November,” Schumer said.

According to the American Bar Association, Bush has used 750 signing statements — more than all other presidents combined.

In practice, signing statements have been used to clarify law and instruct federal agencies on how to enforce new laws. But many critics of Bush have charged that his signing statements often reserve the right to revise, interpret or ignore laws for national security reasons.

ABA President Michael Greco said the practice harms the separation of powers doctrine in the U.S. because Congress is unable to respond to signing statements.

Criminal defense attorney Jeffrey Douglas told XBIZ the signing statement is part of a consistent assault on the 4th Amendment.

“The entire Bush administration wants to be able to act unilaterally without judicial review or Congressional oversight,” Douglas said.

While Douglas said he sees the signing statement as damaging to the nation as a whole, it has no tangible affect on adult entertainment specifically.

“There is no problem using the postal service,” he said. “The issue of obscenity prosecutions is not a matter of shipping. Producers and distributors should make their shipping choices based on economics, not legal concerns.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

25,000 Sign Petition to Legalize Pornography in Ukraine

An OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine has amassed the 25,000 signatures required for official consideration by President Volodymyr Zelensky.

FSC Unpacks SCOTUS Age Verification Ruling in Webinar

The Free Speech Coalition conducted a public webinar Tuesday to help adult industry stakeholders understand the Supreme Court’s recent decision in FSC v. Paxton, and its potential implications.

UK Lawmaker Calls for Appointment of 'Porn Minister'

Baroness Gabrielle Bertin, the Conservative member of Parliament who recently convened a new anti-pornography task force, is calling for the appointment of a “minister for porn,” according to British news outlet The Guardian.

FSC Toasts Jeffrey Douglas for 30 Years of Service

n the very same evening when the adult industry was hit hard by the Supreme Court ruling supporting Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181, members of the Free Speech Coalition board, staff and supporters gathered to celebrate Jeffrey Douglas’ 30 years as board chair — a fitting reflection of his reputation as an eternal optimist.

FSC: Age-Verification Laws Go Into Effect in South Dakota, Georgia, Wyoming on July 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has published a statement regarding new age verification laws set to go into effect tomorrow in South Dakota, Georgia, and Wyoming.

FSC Responds to Supreme Court Decision on Texas AV Law

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has released a statement responding to last week's Supreme Court decision on FSC v. Paxton, the Texas age verification law.

UPDATED: Supreme Court Rules Against Adult Industry in Pivotal Texas AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday issued its decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, striking a blow against the online adult industry by ruling in support of Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

North Carolina Passes Extreme Bill Targeting Adult Sites

The North Carolina state legislature this week ratified a bill that would impose new regulations that industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Supreme Court Ruling Due Friday in FSC v. Paxton AV Case

The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on Friday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the adult industry trade association's challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law, HB 1181.

Ofcom: More Porn Providers Commit to Age Assurance Measures

A number of adult content providers operating in the U.K. have confirmed that they plan to introduce age checks in compliance with the Online Safety Act by the July 25 deadline, according to U.K. media regulator Ofcom.

Show More