Britney Spears Loses Sex Tape Libel Case

LOS ANGELES — Reporting that a couple has made a sex tape is not defamatory per se, according to a California Judge, who tossed a suit by pop star Britney Spears against Us Weekly, saying contemporary community standards and the singer’s high-profile sexual persona combined to create a set of circumstances under which it would be difficult to make the case for the media tort.

The dispute began with an Oct. 17, 2005 article, in which the magazine speculated that Spears and her husband, Kevin Federline, had made a sex tape.

The headline for the article read: “Brit & Kev: Secret Sex Tape? New parents have new worry.”

In the piece, Us Weekly reported that the couple had screened the tape for their lawyers after a member of the singer’s entourage had threatened to make the video public. The article said Spears and Federline were “acting goofy the whole time” as the tape played.

Spears and her lawyers denied the existence of the tape, bringing a suit for libel against the magazine two months later.

In the suit, Spears sought $10 million in damages, claiming that the “article is a false and outrageous fabrication,” which portrayed her in a “despicable light.”

Without addressing the accuracy of the article, Superior Court Judge Lisa Hart Cole issued a three-page ruling, which held that Spears lacked the grounds to sue for defamation in this case.

“Applying any legal standard propounded by the plaintiff, is it sexually deviant, immoral sexual conduct, lustful and sexually promiscuous, pornographic, extremely promiscuous or series misconduct for any married couple to tape themselves having sex for their own personal use in this day and age?” Cole said. “Arguably not. Add to the equation that the plaintiff herself has put her modern sexuality squarely, and profitably, before the public eye, and the answer must be no.”

UCLA Law Professor David Ginsburg applauded Cole’s ruling, saying that the standards of what would be defamatory are always in flux.

Fifty years ago, suggesting that a single woman had engaged in sexual activity was actionable, Ginsburg said.

Under California’s Anti-SLAPP statute, Spears will now be liable for attorney’s fees.

The statute provides for attorneys fees in cases were the plaintiff’s alleged injury results from the defendant exercising its 1st Amendment rights.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Texas Resumes AV Lawsuit Against Aylo Following SCOTUS Decision

A district court judge in Texas has unfrozen the state’s $1.6 million lawsuit against Aylo for allegedly failing to comply with age verification requirements, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

JuicyAds Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

JuicyAds has won its World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) case against a website using a similar domain to impersonate the company's site and defraud customers.

France Reinstates Age Verification Rule for EU Sites

France’s highest court, the Council of State, on Tuesday reinstated age verification rules for EU-based sites under the country’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, ruling in favor of the French government and against Hammy Media.

European Commission Approves AV Guidelines, Unveils Prototype App

The European Commission on Monday released its final, approved guidelines for protecting minors online under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and made public a “white label” age verification app intended to help sites and platforms comply with age verification rules under the DSA.

Federal Appeals Court Vacates FTC 'Click to Cancel' Rule Pending Review

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit on Tuesday vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions, pending further review.

NYC Adult Stores Lose Challenge to Zoning Law, May Face Relocation

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit on Tuesday upheld a lower court’s decision to allow enforcement of a 2001 zoning law aimed at forcing adult retail stores out of most parts of New York City.

FSC Drops Florida AV Lawsuit in Wake of SCOTUS Decision

A U.S. district court judge granted on Tuesday a motion by Free Speech Coalition to dismiss the trade association’s lawsuit over Florida’s age verification law, a case that had been on hold pending the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on the constitutionality of state AV laws.

Ukrainian President Responds to Porn Legalization Petition

President Volodymyr Zelensky responded Tuesday to an OnlyFans model’s petition to decriminalize pornography in Ukraine, stating that he would wait for the legislative process to play out “in accordance with established procedure.”

NC Governor Vetoes Bill Targeting Adult Industry, Override Possible

North Carolina Governor Josh Stein today vetoed a bill imposing new regulations that adult industry observers have warned could push adult websites and platforms to ban most adult creators and content.

Show More