Federal Judge Asked to Remand Measure B Case to State Court

LOS ANGELES — The AIDS Healthcare Foundation filed court papers today asking a federal judge to oppose Vivid Entertainment's motion to reconsider its "intervenors" status in the studio's legal fight to stay enforcement of Measure B and to oppose a judgment on the pleadings.

The AHF also asked the federal court today to remand the case to state court, such as Los Angeles Superior Court, claiming it is a better venue to  "hear and receive all facts and arguments concerning the measure."

The concurrent motions to oppose reconsideration of its status, oppose a judgment in the case and move the case to state court could be last-ditch efforts by the AHF to defend against injunctive relief over enforcement of Measure B.

Vivid and co-plaintiffs Kayden Kross and Logan Pierce filed their suit in January at U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, seeking to topple Los Angeles County's Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act, which was approved by voters in November.

In oral arguments two weeks ago, U.S. District Judge Dean Pregerson did not touch the issue of AHF's status as intervenors in the suit on behalf of defendant Los Angeles County, saying Vivid's argument was "well-briefed."

Pregerson in April ruled that the AHF could intervene in Vivid's suit seeking relief over enforcement of Measure B.

The court granted AHF's motion to intervene based on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal case Hollingsworth vs. Perry. That ruling held that opponents of gay marriage behind California's 2008 Proposition 8 effort had the constitutional authority, or standing, to defend the law in federal courts after the state refused to appeal its loss at trial years earlier.

But the U.S. Supreme Court recently overturned the Hollingsworth decision, and Vivid asked Pregerson to disqualify the AHF as intervenors.

Today, AHF attorneys filed a motion to refute Vivid's stance that the organization should be removed from the suit and that the organization can demonstrate it has a “significantly protectable interest” that satisfies Article III, which allows only an entity or individual who has suffered injury itself or himself to bring a case or appeal in federal court.

"Without intervenors, there is no one in this case to defend that will," the AHF said. "Further, even if the court affirms its decision to allow intervenors in the case, since intervenors potentially could not appeal an adverse decision, the more appropriate forum is a California state court. 

"Because intervenors and/or the citizens of Los Angeles County would have full rights in the California state courts to defend Measure B, and because uniquely Californian issues are a predominant part of this case, the court should abstain from exercising jurisdiction over this matter."

In the concurrent motion, the AHF argued in its brief to oppose a judgment on the pleadings that Vivid has denied all of its factual  allegations, including those that would establish standing and this court’s jurisdiction, and that the pleadings do not establish all the facts required to sustain a judgment.

Further, the AHF said that Measure B does not violate Vivid's First Amendment rights. The AHF, in a court brief, focused on the U.S. Supreme Court case City of Erie vs. Pap's A.M. (Kandyland) that upheld the validity of a city ordinance prohibiting public nudity from a challenge that it prohibited expressive nude dancing in violation of the First Amendment because of "harmful secondary effects."

"While the court agreed that the ordinance did ban nude dancing (dancers were required to wear, at a minimum, pasties and G-strings), and that nude dancing is expressive conduct, the ordinance did not violate respondents’ First Amendment right to free expression," the AHF said.

The AHF also said that Measure B doesn't regulate speech and that use of a condom when filming is even less restrictive than the ordinance at issue in the Erie ruling.

"The Erie ordinance limited what type of dancing  may be shown and viewed in Erie,"  the AHF said. "Measure B, by contrast, in no way limits what films may be viewed by the residents of Los Angeles County. 

"It also in no way limits what films plaintiffs may wish to show in Los Angeles County. Measure B does not ban, punish, or regulate any messages regarding condomless sex in any film. Measure B is not directed at, and is uninterested in, whatever message condomless sex may communicate.

"As such, Measure B is not a speech-related measure, and is not subject to First Amendment scrutiny in the first instance."

The organization also said that the measure isn't a prior restraint, nor is it vague, and that the  permit fee is permissible. It further said that the ordinance isn't preempted by Cal/OSHA standards and that Measure B contains a severability provision.

Pregerson, in oral arguments two weeks ago, said that he had deep-seated troubles with Measure B's language as to severability.

"As the overall aim is STD prevention, the invalidity of any one provision would not render the  entire Measure ineffective, and the voters would prefer it to the status quo," the AHF said. "Measure B also is grammatically severable. Its separate provisions and  distinct requirements 'can be removed as a whole without affecting the wording of any other provision.' It also is functionally severable, in that its separate and distinct requirements (permit, training, etc.) are 'capable of independent application' without the invalid part."

View one of several AHF filings made today

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Go.cam Launches 'One-Line Integration' Verification Solution

Go.cam has introduced a one-line code integration for age verification.

Andi Avalon Fronts Latest From New Sensations

Andi Avalon and Ken Feels star in the latest release from New Sensations.

Ricky's Room Drops Final Installment of Baby Gemini Showcase

Ricky’s Room has released the final installment of its Baby Gemini showcase, titled "Six Bodies In Motion."

XBIZ Amsterdam to Debut 'Behind the Lens' Screening Series

XBIZ is pleased to announce the debut of “Behind the Lens,” a new screening series presenting discussions with noted directors, taking place at the upcoming annual European conference, XBIZ Amsterdam.

'White Rabbit' Party Headed for XBIZ Amsterdam

XBIZ is pleased to announce the White Rabbit Party, an XBIZ Amsterdam special event set to take place Wednesday, Sept. 3.

Hailey Rose Heats Up the Fall Issue of X3 Magazine

2025 XMA Fav Female Performer Hailey Rose headlines the latest issue of X3 magazine, the industry’s premier “authenticity first” publication spotlighting the real personalities, passions and stories behind today’s top creators.

2025 XBIZ Amsterdam Speaker Lineup Announced

XBIZ is pleased to announce the release of the full speaker lineup for XBIZ Amsterdam 2025, the latest edition of Europe’s biggest adult industry conference, set to take place Sept. 2-5 at the Jakarta Hotel in Amsterdam.

Angie Faith's 'Blueprint' for Success

Angie Faith has two reasons to celebrate. First, the veterinarian just gave her Japanese Chin puppy, Cheeky, a clean bill of health after Cheeky unwisely ate a stray piece of Lego.

Cherie DeVille Stars in Latest From Brazzers

Multi-XMAs winner Cherie DeVille stars with 2024 XMAs Male Performer of the Year Zac Wild in the latest Brazzers scene, titled “Cock Support Line.”

Sara Jay, Dan Leal to Sponsor XBIZ Amsterdam Kick-Off Event

Sara Jay’s Wyde Syde Productions and Porno Dan Leal’s Market64 will co-sponsor the Bottoms Up Day Drinking kick-off event for XBIZ Amsterdam 2025 at Excalibur Café on Sept. 2, from 2-4 p.m. (CET).

Show More