Google Hearing Postponed, China Version Launches

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — A hearing in which lawyers for Google were to defend the company’s refusal to hand over search engine data in the Justice Department’s anti-porn crusade has been moved to March 13, more than two weeks from when it was initially scheduled.

U.S. District Court Judge James Ware gave no explanation for the postponement on Thursday.

At the center of the hearing will be whether Google must comply with a Justice Department subpoena, sent to the company more than a year ago, which demands the search engine hand over mountains of data detailing what its users search for while online.

Representatives at the Justice Department have claimed the information will aid the government with new child porn legislation expected to hit Washington later this year, but the requests also have touched off a number of privacy concerns, with many opponents arguing that the type of information someone searches for on the Internet defines the user’s personality, and is therefore an invasion of privacy, regardless of whether or not the individual is personally identified.

Privacy groups also have theorized that the initial request by the government, though relatively innocuous, could lead to larger invasions.

At the same time that Google battles free speech and privacy issues at home, however, the company quietly acquiesced to Chinese demands to heavily filter the new Google China, which launched in late January.

Filters embedded in Google.cn include a long list of banned terms, including not only words related to pornography and online fraud, but also to “democracy,” “June 4, 1989,” “Falun Gong” and “independence.”

A search for “June 4, 1989,” on the U.S.-version of Google, for example, brings up a number of articles on the 1989 crackdown that ended the Tiananmen Square pro-democracy movement. The same search on the Chinese-version of Google yields no mention of the incident.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

New Age Verification Service 'AgeWallet' Launches

Tech company Brady Mills Agency has officially launched its subscription-based age verification solution, AgeWallet.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for September, October

AEBN has published the top search terms for the months of September and October from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Creator, Influencer YesKingzTV Passes Away at 47

Adult content creator and social media personality YesKingzTV, aka Micheal Willis Heard, has passed away at the age of 47.

Pre-Nominations Now Open for 2026 TEAs

The pre-nomination period for the 2026 Trans Erotica Awards (TEAs) is now open.

FSC Releases Updated Age Verification Toolkit

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the release of its updated age verification toolkit.

Duke Tax Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

Duke Tax has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

UK Moving Ahead with Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The U.K. government has announced its intent to follow through on criminalizing “choking” content, a plan that was announced earlier this year.

Italy to Require Age Verification for Adult Sites

Italian media regulator AGCOM has announced that all sites and platforms hosting adult content will be required to implement age verification systems starting Nov. 12 to prevent access by users under 18.

'MILFlicious' Launches Through YourPaysitePartner

MILFlicious.com has officially launched through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Op-Ed: The Guardian's XBIZ Amsterdam Podcast Dismisses Creators' Experiences

British newspaper The Guardian’s podcast coverage of XBIZ Amsterdam 2025 purports to investigate the power dynamics of today’s online adult industry. Instead, it ignores creators’ voices, airs tired and outdated preconceptions about the business, and rehashes the unsupported claims of anti-pornography crusaders.

Show More