Wash. State Sues Over Spam, Spyware

SEATTLE — The Washington State Attorney General's office has sued a New York company and individuals in New York, New Hampshire, Oregon and India under state and federal anti-spam and spyware laws, claiming they induced computer users to download software that weakened its computers' security.

The lead defendant in the lawsuit, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court, is Secure Computer LLC of White Plains, N.Y. Secure Computer President Paul Burke and Gary Preston of Jamaica, N.Y., have made more than $100,000 since summer 2004 selling "spyware cleaner" over the Internet – software they advertised using mass, misleading emails and popups, the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit is the first filed under Washington state's new anti-spyware act and one of the first spyware lawsuits in the country, state Attorney General Rob McKenna said Tuesday.

"In general, we've made more progress on spam than we have on spyware," McKenna said. "Spyware in all its forms is a faster-growing threat than viruses."

Some of the spam and popup ads sent on behalf of Secure Computer imitated Microsoft Corp. messages and products, the lawsuit said. Microsoft has pursued more than 100 anti-spam lawsuits, winning more than $800 million from spammers.

Also named in the lawsuit are Burke's wife, Wendy; Seth T. Traub of Portsmouth, N.H.; Zhijian Chen of Portland, Ore.; and Manoj Kumar of Maharashtra, India. The three allegedly sent emails and advertisements on Secure Computer's behalf in exchange for 75 percent commission on each $49.95 software sale.

"Deceived into believing that dangerous spyware is on their computer and there is no time to waste, the user is induced to purchase ‘Spyware Cleaner,’" the lawsuit said, which added the software does not work properly.

The lawsuit also cites several state and federal laws, from the state consumer protection laws to the federal CAN-SPAM law, short for Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act. The state could possibly be entitled to millions of dollars in damages.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

New Age Verification Service 'AgeWallet' Launches

Tech company Brady Mills Agency has officially launched its subscription-based age verification solution, AgeWallet.

AEBN Publishes Popular Searches for September, October

AEBN has published the top search terms for the months of September and October from its straight and gay theaters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Creator, Influencer YesKingzTV Passes Away at 47

Adult content creator and social media personality YesKingzTV, aka Micheal Willis Heard, has passed away at the age of 47.

Pre-Nominations Now Open for 2026 TEAs

The pre-nomination period for the 2026 Trans Erotica Awards (TEAs) is now open.

FSC Releases Updated Age Verification Toolkit

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the release of its updated age verification toolkit.

Duke Tax Joins Pineapple Support as Supporter-Level Sponsor

Duke Tax has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

UK Moving Ahead with Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The U.K. government has announced its intent to follow through on criminalizing “choking” content, a plan that was announced earlier this year.

Italy to Require Age Verification for Adult Sites

Italian media regulator AGCOM has announced that all sites and platforms hosting adult content will be required to implement age verification systems starting Nov. 12 to prevent access by users under 18.

'MILFlicious' Launches Through YourPaysitePartner

MILFlicious.com has officially launched through YourPaysitePartner (YPP).

Op-Ed: The Guardian's XBIZ Amsterdam Podcast Dismisses Creators' Experiences

British newspaper The Guardian’s podcast coverage of XBIZ Amsterdam 2025 purports to investigate the power dynamics of today’s online adult industry. Instead, it ignores creators’ voices, airs tired and outdated preconceptions about the business, and rehashes the unsupported claims of anti-pornography crusaders.

Show More