New Jersey Outlaws Video Voyeurism

NEW JERSEY – As video and cell cam voyeurism become a popular pastime among curious, technology-savvy users, the legalities surrounding capturing the image of someone without consent is becoming a hot topic among nationwide lawmakers. Especially when that image shows up on a porn site.

In incidents involving voyeurism in bathrooms, dressing rooms, locker rooms, showers, or just on the street where bystanders can be captured unaware, penalties for the average 21st Century peeping Tom are still fairly minimal and many people claiming to be victims of technology-enhanced voyeurism are calling for stiffer penalties and protection.

New Jersey is the latest state to step forward and outlaw clandestine videotaping by reversing a current law that makes secret videotaping nothing more punishable than a trespassing violation.

But the new law, passed this week, makes a huge leap forward in terms of putting a halt to video voyeurism that in some cases ends up on the Internet.

Lawmakers agreed on Tuesday to make video voyeurism a third degree crime. According to Infinity Broadcasting, selling, publishing, and distributing videotape made without permission can carry a possible sentence of up to five years in prison and $15,000 in fines.

The New Jersey State Senate voted unanimously to approve the bill, as did the New Jersey Assembly. The state's governor is currently reviewing the bill.

New York is already one step ahead of New Jersey. Video voyeurism in the Big Apple can land a peeping Tom or misinformed porn entrepreneur in jail for up to seven years.

A report from Infinity Broadcasting states that the New York law was inspired in August of this year after a landlord hid a video camera in his tenant's apartment above her bed for months on end. The landlord was sentenced at the time to three years probation.

The issue of voyeurism goes beyond videotaping laws as cell phones with attachable cameras or embedded digital camera functionality are opening the floodgates to invasion of privacy issues and copyright infringement when it comes to the photographing of artwork or movies that are then uploaded onto the Internet. Not to mention taking hidden shots of naked locker room bodies and posting them for the world to see.

In June of this year, Washington State made photographing or videotaping up a person's skirt a felony and worthy of a year in jail after a man in a supermarket used his cell cam to photograph a woman's underwear while she shopped for groceries with her infant child.

The man was charged with a felony under state law and was released on $25,000 bail.

According to Wired, cell phones with camera capability are prohibited in gym locker rooms in Hong Kong, and public places that typically disallow the use of cameras are now facing a new set of challenges, especially as sales for cell phones with digital camera capabilities are on the rise by 65 percent. Most of that sales activity is being seen in Asia and Western Europe, with the U.S. trailing behind.

By the end of 2003, worldwide sales of cell phone cameras are expected to be between 40 million and 65 million.

Wired added that while cell cam pictures appear blurry on the low-resolution screen of a phone, they can appear vivid over the Internet, and there is rising concerns over the potential for increased voyeurism with these small, nearly undetectable devices.

"The clandestine camera is a hornet's nest for potential social issues," Seamus McAteer, an analyst for Zelos Group, told Wired.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Proposed New Hampshire AV Bill Appears to Violate Constitution

A bill in the New Hampshire state legislature, aimed at requiring adult sites to age-verify users in that state, contains a provision that seemingly contradicts the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution.

Online Child Protection Hearing to Include Federal AV Bill

A House subcommittee will hold a hearing next week on a slate of bills aimed at protecting minors online, including the SCREEN Act, which would make site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content federal law.

FSC Announces 2025 Board of Directors Election Nominees

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the nominees for its 2025 Board of Directors election.

Canada Exempts Online Adult Content From 'CanCon' Quotas

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has updated its broadcasting regulatory policies, exempting streaming adult content from “made in Canada” requirements that apply to other online material.

Creator Law Firm 'OnlyFirm' Launches

Entertainment attorney Alex Lonstein has officially launched OnlyFirm.com for creators.

German Court Puts Pornhub, YouPorn 'Network Ban' on Hold

The Administrative Court of Düsseldorf has temporarily blocked the State Media Authority of North Rhine-Westphalia (LfM) from forcing telecom providers to cut off access to Aylo-owned adult sites Pornhub and YouPorn.

FSC: NC Law Invalidating Model Contracts Takes Effect December 1

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has issued a notice that North Carolina's Prevent Exploitation of Women and Minors Act goes into effect on December 1.

NYC Adult Businesses Seek SCOTUS Appeal in Zoning Case

Attorneys representing a group of New York City adult businesses are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal of a lower court’s decision allowing enforcement of a 2001 zoning law aimed at forcing adult retail stores out of most parts of New York City.

Ofcom Investigates More Sites in Wake of AV Traffic Shifts

U.K. media regulator Ofcom has launched investigations into 20 more adult sites as part of its age assurance enforcement program under the Online Safety Act.

xHamster Settles Texas AV Lawsuit, Pays $120,000

Hammy Media, parent company of xHamster, has settled a lawsuit brought by the state of Texas over alleged noncompliance with the state’s age verification law, agreeing to pay a $120,000 penalty.

Show More