FTC Gets Tough on Patents

WASHINGTON, D.C. – With all the industry banter lately over the validity of Acacia's DMT patents, in a likeminded move this week, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) put forth a proposal that could make patents harder to obtain and easier to challenge.

In an annual address to the American Intellectual Property Law Association, FTC Chairman Timothy J. Muris discussed the proper balance between marketplace competition and patent policy required to promote innovation.

In what might sound like music to many members of the adult community who are currently in litigation with Acacia, or have just received their first letters regarding copyright infringement, the FTC is calling on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to apply tougher standards before issuing patents, and on Congress to enact legislation that would make it easier for companies to challenge those patents in federal court.

Under current FTC procedure, the courts require a business to prove a patent's invalidity by presenting "clear and convincing" evidence.

"This standard appears unjustified," Muris stated. "The FTC believes this requirement undermines the courts' ability to weed out questionable patents, and instead recommends that courts determine validity based on a preponderance of the evidence."

Muris also expressed concern over the quality of patent claims and stated that many of the patents currently out there, should not have been issued in the first place.

"The Patent and Trademark Office must protect the public against the issuance of invalid patents that add unnecessary costs and may confer market power, just as it should issue valid patents to encourage invention, disclosure, and commercial development," Muris stated.

As it stands, the U.S. Patent Office sifts through an average of 300,000 applications on a yearly basis and is currently backlogged by two years and badly in need of additional funding to cope with its overload. Nearly 1,000 patent applications flood into the U.S. Patent Office on a daily basis.

Patent officials are given between eight and 25 hours to read and understand each application, evaluate patent-ability, and write up conclusions.

"Competition and consumers are not served if patents are inappropriately granted or if their scope is undeservedly broad," Muris stated.

He also added that questionable patents may slow innovation and raise costs to businesses and consumers by discouraging firms from conducting research and development and inducing unnecessary licensing.

The FTC's recommendations for amending current patent law are based on a 315-page report that was drafted during a meeting with the Department of Justice in February of this year.

According to the FTC, the hearings took place over a 24-day period and involved more than 300 panelists from large and small firms, the independent inventor community, patent and antitrust organizations, and scholars in economics, patent, and antitrust law.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Sansyl Group Acquires Blue Donkey Media

Sansyl Group, parent company of AdultPrime Network, has acquired Blue Donkey Media B.V., owner of Dutch adult site Meiden van Holland, among several other erotic websites and television channels.

Pineapple Support to Hold Mental Health Summit

The annual Pineapple Support Mental Health Summit is taking place Dec. 15-17.

Ofcom Fines AVS Group $1.3 Million for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Wednesday imposed a penalty of one million pounds, or approximately $1.3 million, on AVS Group Ltd. after an investigation concluded that the company had failed to implement robust age checks on 18 adult websites.

Updated: Aylo to Help Test EU Age Verification App

Pornhub parent company Aylo plans to participate in the European Commission’s pilot program for its “white label” age verification app, a spokesperson for the company has confirmed.

Missouri Lawmaker Attempts to Revive 'Health Warnings' for Adult Sites

A Missouri state representative has introduced a bill that would require adult sites to post notices warning users of alleged physical, mental, and social harms associated with pornography, despite a previous federal court ruling against such requirements.

New Age Verification Service 'BorderAge' Launches

French startup company Needemand has officially launched its subscription-based age verification solution, BorderAge.

Ruling: Italy's 'Porn Tax' Applies to All Content Creators

Italy’s tax revenue agency has ruled that the nation’s 25% “ethical tax” on income generated from adult content applies even to smaller independent online content creators.

Proposed New Hampshire AV Bill Appears to Violate Constitution

A bill in the New Hampshire state legislature, aimed at requiring adult sites to age-verify users in that state, contains a provision that seemingly contradicts the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution.

AEBN Publishes Report on Fetish Trends

AEBN has published a report on fetish categories from its straight and gay theaters.

Online Child Protection Hearing to Include Federal AV Bill

A House subcommittee will hold a hearing next week on a slate of bills aimed at protecting minors online, including the SCREEN Act, which would make site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content federal law.

Show More