FCC to Begin Crafting Net Neutrality Rules

WASHINGTON — The Federal Communications Commission today voted to begin writing network-neutrality regulations.

Despite the dissent of the agency’s two Republican commissioners that said they are opposed to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s proposal, they voted to being the formal rule-making process.

Genachowski said the regulations are necessary to ensure that broadband subscribers can access legal sites and services that compete with the broadband companies’ core businesses.

"Internet users should always have the final say about their online service, whether it's the software, applications or services they choose, or the networks and hardware they use to the connect to the Internet," Genachowski said.

In addition to the existing four “Internet freedoms” that were approved in 2005, the proposed rules push nondiscrimination and transparency.

  • A provider of broadband Internet access service must treat lawful content, applications and services in a nondiscriminatory manner.
  • A provider of broadband Internet access service must disclose such information concerning network management and other practices as is reasonably required for users and content, application and service providers to enjoy the protections specified in this rulemaking.
In addition, certain exceptions for “reasonable network management” have been introduced:

  • To manage congestion on networks;
  • To address harmful traffic (viruses, spam);
  • To block unlawful content (child porn);
  • To block unlawful transfers of content (copyright infringement); and,
  • For "other reasonable network management practices."
The rules are intended to apply to every Internet connection, wired or wireless.

Following the actual crafting of the regulations will be a vote on whether to adopt them, which is expected to come by next summer.

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

House Committee to Weigh Online Safety Bill With Federal AV Requirement

The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce will meet Thursday to consider and potentially amend the Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act, which includes provisions to make age verification by adult websites federal law.

SWR Data Publishes 'Creator Income' Report

Adult industry market research firm SWR Data has published a report on creator incomes.

Pineapple Support to Host 'Neurodivergent Performers' Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group for neurodivergent performers.

'Legal Impact' Webinar Unpacks North Carolina's New Consent Law

Industry attorney Corey D. Silverstein on Thursday held a webinar focused on North Carolina’s HB 805, a new law that has significantly altered performer consent requirements in the state.

FSC Launches Privacy-First Age Verification Solution for Members

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) announced today that it has granted members exclusive access to the PrivateAV age verification solution.

Brazil: New AV Requirements Set to Take Effect March 17

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva this week gave final approval to new regulations requiring adult websites to age-verify users located in Brazil starting March 17.

FSC Recommends Platforms Integrate StopNCII.org Tool

In a blog post, Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has recommended that platforms integrate the StopNCII.org tool to prevent the sharing of non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII).

Utah 'Porn Tax' Bill With VPN Provisions Passes State Senate

The Utah state Senate has passed a bill that would impose a 2% tax on the revenues of adult websites doing business in that state, and make sites liable if Utah minors use VPNs to circumvent geolocation.

Fast-Tracked Arizona Bill Includes Consent 'Catch-22' for Adult Sites

A bill advancing rapidly through the Arizona state legislature would impose new requirements for adult content uploaded online, including seemingly contradictory provisions that could effectively make it impossible for adult sites to operate in the state.

Show More