Federal Judge Blocks Michigan Explicit Video Game Law

DETROIT — A U.S. District Court judge has issued a preliminary injunction to prevent enforcement of a state law that would restrict the sale of explicit video games to minors.

Had the law gone into effect on Dec. 1 as planned, retailers would have faced fines of up to $5,000 and up to 93 days in prison for selling sexually explicit or ultra-violent video games to customers under 18.

But trade associations, including the Entertainment Software Association, Video Software Dealers Association and Michigan Retailers Association, presented a united front in challenging the law. In September, they filed a suit charging that the law is unconstitutionally vague and illegally limits First Amendment rights of Michigan residents.

In his decision, Judge George Caram Steeh wrote that the law would “likely have a chilling effect on adult expression” and result in “self-censoring by game creators, distributors and retailers, including ultimately pulling T- and M-rated games off store shelves altogether.” Steeh added that “loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.”

The state now must go to federal court to prove the bill’s language is within the confines of the Constitution. The governor’s office said it is prepared for a fight.

“This was not an unexpected development, and it is simply just one step in the process of litigating a very important issue,” said Liz Boyd, a spokesperson for Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm. “The governor remains very committed to this issue and protecting Michigan's children.”

In passing the bill, state legislators relied heavily on research that claimed video games contribute to violence, aggression and other behavioral problems among minors. But Judge Steeh said the research was flawed and that it “is unlikely that the state can demonstrate a compelling interest in preventing a perceived harm.”

Michigan was one of three states to pass legislation in 2005 making it illegal to sell explicit games. Illinois passed a similar law earlier this year, and California followed suit after Michigan.

The gaming industry has filed suits to block the laws in both of those states. Federal courts previously have struck down video game restrictions approved by Washington state, Indianapolis and St. Louis County in Missouri, saying they encroached on the First Amendment.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Former IEAU Officer Sentenced to 4 Months

Amanda Gullesserian, who performed in the industry under the name Phyllisha Anne and founded the now-defunct International Entertainment Adult Union (IEAU), has been sentenced to four months’ imprisonment for making a false statement in an IEAU federal financial report.

Utah State Legislator Proposes New 'Porn Tax'

A Utah state senator introduced a bill on Monday that would impose a 7% tax on the gross receipts of adult websites doing business in that state, plus require adult sites to pay an annual $500 fee.

Arcom-Targeted Sites Implement Age Verification in France

Five high-traffic adult websites based outside of France have implemented age verification as required under the nation’s Security and Regulation of the Digital Space (SREN) law, after receiving warnings from French media regulator Arcom.

Florida Attorney General Dismisses AV Suit Against Segpay

The Florida attorney general’s office on Monday agreed to dismiss claims against payment processor Segpay in a lawsuit over alleged noncompliance with the state’s age verification law.

FTC Weighs Reboot of 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking Process

The Federal Trade Commission has invited public comments on a petition to renew trade regulation rulemaking concerning negative option plans, after a federal court previously vacated a “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

New Federal Bills Aim to Repeal Section 230

Members of Congress this week introduced two bills calling for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

House of Lords Approves UK Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The House of Lords, the U.K.’s upper house of Parliament, has agreed to amendments to the pending Crime and Policing Bill that would make depicting “choking” in pornography illegal and designate it a “priority offense” under the Online Safety Act.

Indiana Sues Aylo Over AV, Calls IP Address Blocking 'Insufficient'

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita has filed a lawsuit against Aylo, alleging that the company and its affiliates have violated both Indiana’s age verification law and the state’s Deceptive Consumer Sales Act.

House Committee Amends, Advances Federal AV Bill

A U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee voted Thursday to amend the SCREEN Act, which would make site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content federal law, and to advance the bill for review by the full Committee on Energy and Commerce.

FSC Announces Board of Directors Election Results

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the results of its 2026/2027 Board of Directors election.

Show More