Federal Judge Blocks Michigan Explicit Video Game Law

DETROIT — A U.S. District Court judge has issued a preliminary injunction to prevent enforcement of a state law that would restrict the sale of explicit video games to minors.

Had the law gone into effect on Dec. 1 as planned, retailers would have faced fines of up to $5,000 and up to 93 days in prison for selling sexually explicit or ultra-violent video games to customers under 18.

But trade associations, including the Entertainment Software Association, Video Software Dealers Association and Michigan Retailers Association, presented a united front in challenging the law. In September, they filed a suit charging that the law is unconstitutionally vague and illegally limits First Amendment rights of Michigan residents.

In his decision, Judge George Caram Steeh wrote that the law would “likely have a chilling effect on adult expression” and result in “self-censoring by game creators, distributors and retailers, including ultimately pulling T- and M-rated games off store shelves altogether.” Steeh added that “loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.”

The state now must go to federal court to prove the bill’s language is within the confines of the Constitution. The governor’s office said it is prepared for a fight.

“This was not an unexpected development, and it is simply just one step in the process of litigating a very important issue,” said Liz Boyd, a spokesperson for Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm. “The governor remains very committed to this issue and protecting Michigan's children.”

In passing the bill, state legislators relied heavily on research that claimed video games contribute to violence, aggression and other behavioral problems among minors. But Judge Steeh said the research was flawed and that it “is unlikely that the state can demonstrate a compelling interest in preventing a perceived harm.”

Michigan was one of three states to pass legislation in 2005 making it illegal to sell explicit games. Illinois passed a similar law earlier this year, and California followed suit after Michigan.

The gaming industry has filed suits to block the laws in both of those states. Federal courts previously have struck down video game restrictions approved by Washington state, Indianapolis and St. Louis County in Missouri, saying they encroached on the First Amendment.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

California, Florida Reps File Latest Bill to Repeal Section 230

Two members of Congress on Thursday introduced new legislation to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

Second Bill Proposed to Shield US Sites From 'Foreign Censorship'

For the second time in recent weeks, a Republican congressman has introduced legislation to bar U.S. courts from helping to enforce foreign laws restricting speech that would domestically be protected under the First Amendment, potentially including foreign age verification laws.

Ukrainian Legislators Revive Porn Decriminalization Push

The Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine’s parliament, is once again considering a bill that would decriminalize the creation and distribution of pornography in that country — an activity that currently carries a prison sentence of three to five years.

Ofcom Fines XGroovy $986,000 for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday imposed a fine of 700,000 pounds (about $986,000) against adult website XGroovy for failing to comply with provisions of the Online Safety Act.

Utah VPN Enforcement Pause Extended in Aylo Lawsuit

Provisions of a Utah law making adult websites liable if minors in the state circumvent geolocation efforts to bypass age verification, which were set to come into force in May, have again been put on hold temporarily.

Anti-Censorship Bill Could Shield US Sites From Foreign AV Laws

A Republican congressman has introduced legislation to bar U.S. courts from helping to enforce any foreign law restricting speech that would domestically be protected under the First Amendment, potentially including foreign age verification laws.

Romantix-Fargo Zoning Dispute Heads Back to District Court

A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that zoning officials in Fargo, North Dakota, acted in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner when they prevented sex toy retailer Romantix from opening a planned retail store in that city.

Appeals Court Upholds Section 230 Immunity in XVideos Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has upheld a lower court’s ruling that Section 230 protects WebGroup Czech Republic from liability in a case involving user-uploaded CSAM on its tube sites.

JustFor.fans Wins Trademark Infringement Case Against Fraudulent Domain

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has ruled in favor of JustFor.fans in a case against a website using an infringing domain.

Aylo Moves to Settle Two 'Children of Pornhub' Class-Action Lawsuits

Aylo has agreed to terms for a settlement with the plaintiffs in two long-running class actions over allegations that former Pornhub parent company MindGeek knowingly allowed and profited from CSAM on its sites.

Show More