FBI Violated Surveillance Laws

WASHINGTON — In cases that range from snagging bank records to eavesdropping on emails, classified documents obtained by the Washington Post today suggest the FBI has violated state and federal surveillance laws in a number of its investigations.

According to records declassified in an ongoing Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought on by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), hundreds of potentially illegal activities were authorized by the FBI in recent years, especially following the terrorists attacks in New York on Sept. 11.

The papers include cases where emails and bank records were obtained without proper warrants, “unconsented physical” searches of suspects were authorized and even years of covert surveillance in the U.S. of suspects who were tracked without the Justice Department’s knowledge, which is a violation of Justice guidelines.

The documents have already sparked debate in the House and Senate, where politicians must once again face the controversial freedoms laid out in the Patriot Act, which made searching and surveillance easier for law enforcement after Sept. 11 but has consistently ignited controversy as a potential time bomb of civil liberties abuse.

“We're seeing what might be the tip of the iceberg at the FBI and across the intelligence community,” EPIC's General Counsel David Sobel said. “It indicates that the existing mechanisms do not appear adequate to prevent abuses or to ensure the public that abuses that are identified are treated seriously and remedied.”

The FBI, however, is taking the cases lightly, saying the “abuses” were little more than a result of clerical errors or minor miscommunications.

“Every investigator wants to make sure that their investigation is handled appropriately, because they're not going to be allowed to keep information that they didn't have the proper authority to obtain,” one senior FBI official told the Post, speaking anonymously during the ongoing case. “But that is a relatively uncommon occurrence. The vast majority of the [cases] reported have to do with administrative timelines and time frames for renewing orders.”

Nonetheless, Sobel said 287 violations were found between 2002 and 2004 alone, and is calling for legislation that would require the attorney general to report any FBI violations to the Senate. To aid their case, Sobel and other EPIC representatives sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee today claiming the new documents prove very little is known about how the FBI conducts itself.

The adult community is, of course, no stranger to the eye of the FBI. The EPIC case comes just weeks after the offices of Max Hardcore’s Max World Entertainment were raided by the FBI and a month after the FBI established an anti-obscenity squad to target obscenity abuses throughout the country.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

FTC Weighs Reboot of 'Click to Cancel' Rulemaking Process

The Federal Trade Commission has invited public comments on a petition to renew trade regulation rulemaking concerning negative option plans, after a federal court previously vacated a “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at making it easier for consumers to cancel online subscriptions.

New Federal Bills Aim to Repeal Section 230

Members of Congress this week introduced two bills calling for the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects interactive computer services — including adult platforms — from liability for user-generated content.

House of Lords Approves UK Plan to Outlaw 'Choking' Content

The House of Lords, the U.K.’s upper house of Parliament, has agreed to amendments to the pending Crime and Policing Bill that would make depicting “choking” in pornography illegal and designate it a “priority offense” under the Online Safety Act.

Indiana Sues Aylo Over AV, Calls IP Address Blocking 'Insufficient'

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita has filed a lawsuit against Aylo, alleging that the company and its affiliates have violated both Indiana’s age verification law and the state’s Deceptive Consumer Sales Act.

House Committee Amends, Advances Federal AV Bill

A U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee voted Thursday to amend the SCREEN Act, which would make site-based age verification of users seeking to access adult content federal law, and to advance the bill for review by the full Committee on Energy and Commerce.

FSC Announces Board of Directors Election Results

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has announced the results of its 2026/2027 Board of Directors election.

Report: AVS Group Beefs Up AV After $1.3 Million Fine

Adult content provider AVS Group has begun to institute robust age checks on some of its websites after U.K. media regulator Ofcom last week imposed a penalty of approximately $1.3 million for noncompliance with Online Safety Act regulations, the BBC is reporting.

FSC: Federal Report Confirms Unfair Banking Discrimination Against Adult Industry

The Free Speech Coalition (FSC) today announced that a federal report on debanking has concluded that several U.S. banks engaged in discriminatory banking practices against members of the adult industry.

FSC Summit Event Schedule Announced

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has revealed its slate of networking events and symposiums for its annual summit, set for January 15 during XBIZ 2026.

Washington AV Bill Jumps on 'Health Warning' Bandwagon

A new age verification bill in the Washington state legislature would require adult sites to post notices warning users of alleged health risks, despite a previous federal court ruling against such requirements.

Show More